Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cell Tissue Res ; 397(1): 51-60, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625373

ABSTRACT

Gadolinium is a component of the MRI contrast agent Dotarem. Although Dotarem is the least toxic among MRI contrasts used, gadolinium present in Dotarem accumulates for many years in various organs and tissues exerting toxic effects. We showed previously that gadolinium remains in macrophages for at least 7 days after exposure to Dotarem. However, very little is known about the effect of gadolinium retention on the immune cells such as macrophages. We studied the effect of 1-day and 7-day retention of gadolinium on various functions and molecular pathways of macrophages. Gadolinium retention for 7 days decreased macrophage adhesion and motility and dysregulated the expression of adhesion and fibrotic pathway-related proteins such as Notch1 and its ligand Jagged1, adhesion/migration-related proteins PAK1 and Shp1, immune response-related transcription factors Smad3 and TCF19, and chemokines CXCL10 and CXCL13, and dysregulated the mRNA expression of fibrosis-related genes involved in extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis, such as Col6a1, Fibronectin, MMP9, and MMP12. It also completely (below a level of detection) shut down the transcription of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage polarization marker the Arg-1. Such changes, if they occur in MRI patients, can be potentially detrimental to the patient's immune system and immune response-related processes.


Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Gadolinium , Macrophages , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Macrophages/metabolism , Macrophages/drug effects , Gadolinium/adverse effects , Gadolinium/toxicity , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Animals , Humans , Mice
2.
Stem Cell Investig ; 10: 9, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37077316

ABSTRACT

Like all immune cells, macrophages do not act autonomously but in unison with other immune cells, surrounding tissues, and the niche they occupy. Constant exchange of information between cellular and noncellular participants within a tissue allows for preserving homeostasis and defining responses in a pathologic environment. Although molecular mechanisms and pathways involved in reciprocal signaling between macrophages and other immune cells have been known for decades, much less is known about interactions between macrophages and stem/progenitor cells. Based on the time when stem cells form, there are two stem cell types: embryonic stem cells existing only in an early embryo, which are pluripotent and can differentiate into any cell type present in an adult, and somatic (adult) stem cells formed in fetus and persisting for whole adult life. Tissues and organs have their own (tissue-specific and organ-specific) adult stem cells, which serve as a reserve for tissue homeostasis and regeneration after injury. It is still uncertain whether organ- and tissue-specific stem cells are actual stem cells or just progenitor cells. The important question is how stem/progenitor cells can sculpt macrophage phenotype and functions. Even less is known if or how macrophages can shape stem/progenitor cell functions, their divisions, and fate. We describe here examples from recent studies of how stem/progenitor cells can affect macrophages and how macrophages can influence stem/progenitor cell properties, functions, and destiny.

3.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 118: 110017, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36931169

ABSTRACT

Macrophages play a crucial role in, the currently uncurable, chronic rejection of transplants. In rodent transplantation models, inhibition of the RhoA/Rock pathway disrupts actin-related functions of macrophages, preventing them from entering the graft, and reducing vessel occlusion, fibrosis, and chronic rejection. Among RhoA/Rock inhibitors that inhibit chronic rejection in mouse transplantation are Y27632, Fingolimod, and Rezurock. In a mouse model, Rezurok is more effective in preventing fibrosis and less effective in preventing vessel occlusion than Y27632 or Fingolimod. Fingolimod is FDA-approved for treating multiple sclerosis (MS) and Rezurock for chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). Still, none had been tested for chronic rejection in humans. To explain the differences in the anti-chronic rejection properties of Y27632, Fingolimod, and Rezurock, we compared the transcriptome profile of mouse macrophages treated with these compounds separately. Treatment with Y27632 or Fingolimod downregulated GTPase and actin pathways involved in cell migration. Rezurock downregulated genes related to fibrosis, such as PTX3, CCR2, CCL2, cell cycle, DNA replication, adaptive immune response, and organelle assembly, while Fingolimod also specifically downregulated NOTCH1 at mRNA . The result of this study not only uncovers which pathways are shared or specific for these drugs but will help in the development of macrophage pathway-targeted therapies in human transplantation, MS, and GVHD. Because macrophages are the major players in immune response, tissue regeneration, renewal, and homeostasis, and development of many diseases, including cancer, the data compiled here will help in designing novel or improved therapies in many clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Fingolimod Hydrochloride , Graft vs Host Disease , Animals , Humans , Mice , Actins/metabolism , Fibrosis , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/pharmacology , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Macrophages , rho-Associated Kinases/genetics , rho-Associated Kinases/metabolism , rhoA GTP-Binding Protein/metabolism , Transcriptome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...