Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Med Ultrason (2001) ; 45(4): 577-581, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29721640

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of a pocket-sized ultrasound device (PUD) for evaluating dilatation of the renal collecting system with high-end ultrasound devices (HUDs) as a reference standard. METHODS: One sonographer examined both kidneys using a PUD to evaluate dilatation of the collecting system. The grading of the dilatation ranged from 0 to 4. Immediately after the examination, another sonographer blinded to the previous results performed a formal examination with a HUD. RESULTS: Two hundred kidneys in 100 patients were included in the analysis. The agreement of grades between the PUD and HUDs was excellent (weighted kappa = 0.83; P < 0.001). When hydronephrosis was defined as grade 1 or higher, the test characteristics of the PUD were as follows: sensitivity 91% (95% confidence interval (CI) 79-97%), positive predictive value 73% (95% CI 60-83%), and negative predictive value 96% (95% CI 92-99%). When hydronephrosis was defined as grade 2 or higher, the test characteristics were as follows: sensitivity 88% (95% CI 73-97%), positive predictive value 75% (95% CI 59-87%), and negative predictive value 98% (95% CI 94-99%). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound using a PUD is useful for evaluating dilatation of the collecting system, especially for ruling out its presence.


Subject(s)
Hydronephrosis/diagnostic imaging , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Point-of-Care Systems , Ultrasonography/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Single-Blind Method , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...