[Evaluation of the Influence of Pharmaceuticals on the Mechanical Properties of Polymeric Medical Devices].

Pharmaceuticals reportedly cause damage to some polymeric medical devices that administer them. Because this phenomenon and its causes still remain unclear, in this study, all the possible combinations of polymeric materials and pharmaceutical ingredients that could cause failures were identified by conducting a comprehensive analysis on a wide variety of such combinations and through verification tests using the products. The results of the simple immersion tests and the reports of clinical failures indicated that the failures were not caused by the lack of chemical resistance of the polymers but by the environmental stress cracking (ESC) induced by a combination of the stress generated in the material and the interaction with a specific chemical. Therefore, we evaluated all combinations that could cause ESC by developing and applying a simple method for testing ESC. Polycarbonate and polyethylene terephthalate were found to be damaged by alkaline solutions and oils and fats, and surfactants solutions. These failures were also confirmed by the verification tests. Results from the stress state verification, fractographic analysis, and other studies confirmed that these failures were caused by ESC. Cytotoxicity owing to the induction of ESC was not detected in any combination. These results indicated that the residual stress generated during the manufacturing process was one of the reasons for the failure of the medical devices. This residual stress can be eliminated by employing additional processes such as annealing, thereby preventing medical device failures induced through interactions with pharmaceutical ingredients.

Elevated expression of G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with uterine cervical adenocarcinoma.

Uterine cervical adenocarcinoma has a worse prognosis than that of squamous cell carcinoma and useful diagnostic and prognostic markers are needed. Estrogen is one of the key regulators of several cancers, however, the estrogen signaling has not been focused on in cervical adenocarcinoma. Here, we shows expression profile of classical estrogen receptor (ER) and a novel membrane type estrogen receptor, G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30), in surgical specimens (n=53). GPR30 was strongly expressed on the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm in adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and adenocarcinoma, and its expression was especially strong at the invasion front in most of the cases of GPR30-positive adenocarcinoma. Nuclear staining of ER was strong in non-neoplastic glands, whereas it was almost absent in most of the AIS and adenocarcinoma cases. There was a weak but statistically significant negative correlation between immunoreactivity of GPR30 and that of ER in cervical AIS and adenocarcinoma lesions (Spearman's correlation, r=-0.324, p=0.017). ROC curve analysis revealed that immunoreactivity of GPR30 successfully distinguished neoplasms from non-neoplastic glands with high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (75.5%). GPR30 positivity was significantly correlated with histological type (p=0.009), tumor diameter (p=0.003), tumor size (p<0.001), lymphovascular infiltration (p=0.005) and UICC stage (p<0.001). ER expression was correlated only with tumor factor (p=0.047). GPR30-high patients had poor prognosis with a significantly shorter overall survival (OS) period (p=0.0309). GPR30 expression is a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker.

Prognostic significance of the co-expression of EGFR and HER2 in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Prognostic factors and therapeutic targets are needed for the patients with cervical adenocarcinoma because they have a poor prognosis. Recently, co-expression of multiple receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) has been found to be associated with aggressive biological behavior and poor prognosis of several types of malignancy. To evaluate the significance of the expression of multiple RTKs in uterine cervical cancers, we examined the expression profile of RTKs (EGFR, HER2 and c-Met) and the correlation of their expression with clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with cervical adenocarcinomas. AIS and adenocarcinoma showed strong expression of a single RTK (EGFR, HER2 or c-Met) on the cell membrane in 41 (77.4%) of 53 cases. Twenty (46%) of the 43 adenocarcinoma cases were positive for double or triple RTKs (P = 0.034). Positivity for EGFR and double positivity for EGFR and HER2 (EGFR+/HER2+/c-Met+ and EGFR+/HER2+/c-Met-) were significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.010 for single and P = 0.013 for double) and UICC stage (P = 0.021 for single and P = 0.007 for double). Positivity for HER2 was significantly correlated with tumor size (P = 0.029). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly shorter in patients who were double positive for EGFR and HER2. Our results suggest that EGFR and HER2 are potential therapeutic targets and that their co-expression is a prognostic factor for cervical adenocarcinoma.