Prevalence of methadone injection in three Swiss cities.

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous methadone is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. A previous report from a methadone center in Fribourg, Switzerland, found a high prevalence (43%) of patients who injected oral methadone. We therefore wished to assess the prevalence of methadone injection among patients in oral methadone programs in 3 other Swiss cities--Lausanne, Geneva, and La Chaux-de-Fonds. METHOD: Subjects were randomly selected and interviewed by assistant psychologists who were not on the staff of the study centers. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. RESULTS: 164 patients participated in the study (n = 58 in Lausanne, 52 in Geneva, and 54 in La Chaux-de-Fonds). The prevalence of methadone injection was low (5%) and did not differ significantly between the cities. DISCUSSION: Less liberal policies cannot explain the lower prevalence of methadone injection in these three centers than in Fribourg. The high prevalence of methadone injection there is probably related to its separate methadone injection program: patients in oral methadone programs may be more likely to injection methadone when other patients authorized to do so. IN CONCLUSION: Although the 5% prevalence of methadone injection found in the 3 cities surveyed is low, it is not negligible. These results suggest that information on the risks associated with injection of methadone syrup should be provided to all methadone maintenance. This information is especially necessary when maintenance therapy is provided in the same center, or city as injectable methadone maintenance.

Increase of oral methadone dose in methadone injecting patients: a pilot study.

A pilot study was initiated in seven methadone injecting patients to examine whether intravenous methadone use in patients in oral methadone maintenance treatment could be decreased by increased oral methadone dose. During the study, patients had a standardized methadone dose increase for three weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Mean methadone doses prior to, and at the end of the study, were 99 mg/day and 163 mg/day, respectively. On week 15, the mean frequency of injection and the mean proportion of methadone dose injected were reduced to 46% of the values measured at week 0 (p = 0.043 and p = 0.028, respectively). Two patients did not modify their fre- quency, nor their dose of injected methadone, four patients decreased their use of injectable methadone, while one completely stopped injecting methadone. Since the completion of the pilot study, an augmentation of oral methadone dose has been proposed as a therapeutic option to 18 other methadone injecting patients. Five patients did not change their frequency of injection. They did, however, either completely stop or decrease their illicit opiate consumption. Nine patients decreased their frequency of methadone injection from a mean 95% down to 35%. Finally, four patients completely stopped injecting methadone. Although the present results have to be confirmed by controlled studies including a larger number of patients, when considering the high frequency of methadone injection in some places and the associated problems, the therapeutic option of increasing methadone dose should be considered further.

Cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype and methadone steady-state concentrations.

A genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450 2D6 has been described with the existence of poor (zero functional genes), extensive (one or two functional genes), and ultrarapid metabolizers (three or more functional genes). The authors measured the steady-state trough (R)- (i.e., the active enantiomer), (S)-, and (R,S)-methadone plasma levels in opiate-dependent patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and genotyped them for cytochrome P4502D6. The patients' medical records were reviewed to assess the outcome of the MMT with regard to the absence of illicit opiate consumption and to the absence of withdrawal complaints in ultrarapid and poor metabolizers. Of 256 patients included, 18 were found to be poor metabolizers, 228 to be extensive metabolizers, and 10 to be ultrarapid metabolizers. Significant differences were found between genotypes for (R)- (p = 0.024), (S)- (p = 0.033), and (R,S)-methadone (p = 0.026) concentrations to dose-to-weight ratios. For (R)-methadone, a significant difference was found between ultrarapid metabolizers and poor metabolizers (p = 0.009), with the median value in the former group being only 54% of the median value in the latter group. These results confirm the involvement of cytochrome P450 2D6 in methadone metabolism. Although the difference was nonsignificant (p = 0.103), 13 (72%) of the 18 poor metabolizers and only 4 (40%) of the 10 ultrarapid metabolizers were considered successful in their treatment. More studies are needed to examine the influence of the ultrarapid metabolizer status on the outcome of the MMT.

Double-blind randomized trial of buprenorphine and methadone in opiate dependence.

This study compared the safety and efficacy of sublingual buprenorphine tablets with oral methadone in a population of opioid-dependent individuals in a double-blind, randomized, 6-week trial using a flexible dosing procedure. Fifty-eight patients seeking treatment for opioid dependence were recruited in three outpatient facilities and randomly assigned to substitution with buprenorphine or methadone. The retention rate was significantly better in the methadone maintained group (90 vs. 56%; P<0.001). Subjects completing the study in both the treatment groups had similar proportions of opioid positive urine samples (buprenorphine 62%; methadone 59%) and positive urine specimens, as well as mean heroin craving scores decreased significantly over time (P=0.035 and P<0.001). The proportion of cocaine-positive toxicology results did not differ between groups. At week six mean stabilization doses were 10.5 mg per day for the sublingual buprenorphine tablet, and 69.8 mg per day for methadone, respectively. Patient performance during maintenance was similar in both the groups. The high attrition rate in the buprenorphine group during the induction phase might reflect inadequate induction doses. Thus, buprenorphine is a viable alternative for methadone in short-term maintenance treatment for heroin dependence if treatment induction is done with adequate dosages.

[Alcoholism: cognitive-behavioral therapy]. / Alcoolodépendance: thérapies cognitivo-comportementales.

Cognito-behavioral therapy of alcohol dependence is based mainly on the aspect of enhancing social integration and conditioning. Clinical applications are thus focused on behavioral modifications, including social learning and coping skills. This approach may be individual or based on group therapy; specific programs may be adjusted to the severity of neuropsychological impairment and/or to the motivation of the patient.

Oral and intravenous methadone use: some clinical and pharmacokinetic aspects.

A sample of 15 patients participating in an injectable methadone trial and of 15 patients in an oral methadone maintenance treatment, who admitted injecting part or all of their methadone take-home doses, were compared to 20 patients in maintenance treatment who use methadone exclusively by mouth. The present study confirms the poorer general health, the higher levels of emotional, psychological or psychiatric problems, the higher use of illicit drugs, and the higher number of problems related to employment and support associated with the use of the intravenous mode of administration of methadone. As expected, due to the shunt of metabolism in the gut wall and of the liver first-pass effect, higher concentration to dose ratios of (R)-methadone, which is the active enantiomer, were measured in the intravenous group (23% increase). This difference reached an almost statistically significant value (P = 0.054). This raises the question whether the effect of a higher methadone dose could be unconsciously sought by some of the intravenous methadone users.

[Frequency of injection of oral methadone solutions at treatment center for opiate dependence]. / Zur Häufigkeit der Injektion von Methadon-Trinklösungen an einem Behandlungszentrum für Opiatabhängige.

A sample of 134 patients (mean age 29.35 years, SD = 5.84, 72.4% of all patients in treatment at this point of time) were interviewed on the injection of peroral methadone. 43% of patients indicated having injected peroral methadone, 21% in the preceding month with a mean frequency of 10.3 injections. All of the patients concerned were in maintenance either with peroral or with injectable methadone. There were no significant differences between males and females and between the maintenance program with peroral and the one with injectable methadone regarding number of persons concerned and frequency of injection. 75% of patients were aware of associated health risks, their knowledge about these risks being modest. Asked about the reason for the injection patients most often mentioned a faster and more intense effect of the injected methadone as well as dependence on the injection per se or the syringe.

[Cognitive behavior therapy for the treatment of alcoholism]. / Approche cognitivo-comportementale du traitement de l'alcoolodépendance psychique.

The cognitive-behavioral model for the treatment of alcoholism is mainly based on social learning and conditioning theories. Clinical applications emphasize behavioral changes with acquisition of new skills and avoidance strategies. Individual or group therapy is in the form of cognitive-behavioral psychoeducational modules which are designed to take account of the degree of neuropsychological impairment and adopt specific objectives in accordance with patient motivation.

Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence. Swiss multicentre study.

A three-centre, randomised, double-blind study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine and methadone. This was the first European study to compare these agents and was based on a previous trial performed in the US. Opioid-dependent subjects were randomised to receive either sublingual buprenorphine or oral methadone daily. Both objective and subjective measures of efficacy were monitored weekly, and safety parameters were regularly monitored over the entire six-week study. Urinalysis showed that the two treatments were similar with a slight increase in opioid-negative urines noted in both groups. The retention rate in the buprenorphine group was lower than in the methadone group, although it has been suggested that the buprenorphine dose may have been too low for some patients. None of the side effects noted were considered serious and all were attributable to chronic opioid dependence. Experience of two years substitution treatment in Fribourg suggests that initial induction onto buprenorphine allows for patients to be subgrouped before being given the most appropriate maintenance agent. Further investigation is required into the different dose-related effects of buprenorphine seen in particular subsets of addicts.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of citalopram with and without lithium in the treatment of therapy-resistant depressive patients: a clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacogenetic investigation.

Sixty-nine depressive patients (DSM III criteria: 296.2, 296.3, 296.5, 300.4) were treated with 40 to 60 mg citalopram (CIT) daily for 4 weeks. Among them, 45 responded to treatment (improvement > 50% on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D]) and continued their treatment for another week before being released from the study. The 24 nonresponders were randomized and comedicated under double-blind conditions with lithium carbonate (Li) (2 x 400 mg/day) (CIT-Li group) or with placebo (CIT-Pl group) from days 29 to 35. For days 36 to 42, the patients of both subgroups were treated openly with Li (800 mg/day) in addition to the ongoing CIT treatment. On day 35, 6 of 10 patients responded to the CIT-Li combination, whereas 2 of 14 patients only responded to the CIT-Pl combination. This group difference reached significance (p < 0.05) on day 35 with lower HAM-D total scores in the CIT-Li group. No evidence was seen of a pharmacokinetic interaction between CIT and Li, and this combination was well tolerated. Patients were phenotyped with dextromethorphan and mephenytoin at baseline and at day 28. As evaluated at baseline, three patients (responders) were poor metabolizers of dextromethorphan and six patients (three responders and three nonresponders) of mephenytoin. On day 28, the ratio CIT/N-desmethylCIT (DCIT) in plasma was significantly higher in poor than in extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin (p = 0.0001), and there was a significant positive correlation between the metabolic ratio of dextromethorphan and the ratio DCIT/N-didesmethylCIT in plasma (p < 0.001). These findings illustrate the role of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 in the metabolism of CIT. It can be concluded that Li addition to CIT is effective in patients not responding to CIT alone without any evidence of an accentuation or provocation of adverse events.

Alopecia and mood stabilizers: two case reports.

Two cases of alopecia observed during treatment with lithium and valproate are described, and the recent literature on this subject is reviewed. Our clinical observations confirm earlier reports. These toxic alopecias are characterized by a diffuse but rarely total hair loss. After stopping medication, the hair grows back generally and completely. Two cases of toxic alopecia are presented where hair grew back following a substitution of lithium by valproate in the first case and after stopping valproate in the second. The evaluation and therapeutic attitude in the presence of alopecia in patients needing mood stabilizers are also discussed.

[Treatment of resistant depression with the citalopram-lithium combination. Methodology of a double-blind multicenter study and preliminary results]. / Traitement de la dépression résistante par l'association citalopram-lithium. Méthodologie d'une étude multicentrique en double aveugle et résultats préliminaires.

Citalopram, a new bicyclic antidepressant, is the most selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. In a number of double-blind controlled studies, citalopram was compared to placebo and to known tricyclic antidepressants. These studies have shown their efficacy and good safety. The inefficacy of a psychotropic treatment in at least 20% of depressives has led a number of authors to propose original drug combinations and associations, like antidepressant/lithium (Li), antidepressant/sleep deprivation (agrypnia), antidepressant/ECT, or antidepressant/LT3. The aim of this investigation is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a combined citalopram/lithium treatment in therapy-resistant patients, taking account of serotonergic functions, as tested by the fenfluramine/prolactin test, and of drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics of metabolism. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: A washout period of 3 days before initiating the treatment is included. After an open treatment phase of 28 days (D) with citalopram (20 mg D1-D3; 40 mg D4-D14; 40 or 60 mg D15-D28; concomitant medication allowed: chloral, chlorazepate), the nonresponding patients [less than 50% improvement in the total score on the 21 item-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)] are selected and treated with or without Li (randomized in double-blind conditions: citalopram/Li or citalopram/placebo) during the treatment (D29-D35). Thereafter, all patients included in the double-blind phase subsequently receive an open treatment with citalopram/Li for 7 days (D36-D42). The hypothesis of a relationship between serotoninergic functions in patients using the fenfluramine/prolactin test (D1) and the clinical response to citalopram (and Li) is assessed. Moreover, it is evaluated whether the pharmacogenetic status of the patients, as determined by the mephenytoin/dextromethorphan test (D0-D28), is related to the metabolism of fenfluramine and citalopram, and also to the clinical response. CLINICAL ASSESSMENT: Patients with a diagnosis of major depressive disorders according to DSM III are submitted to a clinical assessment of D1, D7, D14, D28, D35, D42: HDRS, CGI (clinical global impression), VAS (visual analog scales for self-rating of depression), HDRS (Hamilton depression rating scale, 21 items), UKU (side effects scale), and to clinical laboratory examens, as well as ECG, control of weight, pulse, blood pressure at D1, D28, D35. Fenfluramine/prolactin test: A butterfly needle is inserted in a forearm vein at 7 h 45 and is kept patent with liquemine. Samples for plasma prolactin, and d- and l-fenfluramine determinations are drawn at 8 h 15 (base line). Patients are given 60 mg fenfluramine (as a racemate) at 8 h 30. Kinetic points are determined at 9 h 30, 10 h 30, 11 h 30, 12 h 30, 13 h 30. Plasma levels of d- and l-fenfluramine are determined by gas chromatography and prolactin by IRNA. Mephenytoin/dextromethorphan test: Patients empty their bladders before the test; they are then given 25 mg dextropethorphan and 100 mg mephenytoin (as a racemate) at 8 h 00. They collect all urines during the following 8 hours. The metabolic ratio is determined by gas chromatography (metabolic ratio dextromethorphan/dextrorphan greater than 0.3 = PM (poor metabolizer); mephenytoin/4-OH-mephenytoin greater than 5.6, or mephenytoin S/R greater than 0.8 = PM). Citalopram plasma levels: Plasma levels of citalopram, desmethylcitalopram and didesmethylcitalopram are determined by gas chromatography--mass spectrometry. RESULTS OF THE PILOT STUDY. The investigation has been preceded by a pilot study including 14 patients, using the abovementioned protocol, except that all nonresponders were medicated with citalopram/Li on D28 to D42. The mean total score (n = 14) on the 21 item Hamilton scale was significantly reduced after the treatment, ie from 26.93 +/- 5.80 on D1 to 8.57 +/- 6.90 on D35 (p less than 0.001). A similar patCitalopram, a new bicyclic antidepressant, is the most selective serotonin reu