Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Functional Treatment Planning in Patients With Advanced Hepatic Cirrhosis.

Purpose: We report on the feasibility and outcomes of liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) functional treatment planning in patients with Child-Pugh (CP) B/C cirrhosis. Methods and Materials: Liver SPECT with 99mTc-sulfur colloid was coregistered to treatment planning computed tomography (CT) for the guided avoidance of functional hepatic parenchyma during SBRT. Functional liver volumes (FLVs) obtained from SPECT were compared with anatomic liver volumes defined on the planning CT. Radiation dose constraints were adapted exclusively to FLV. Local control, toxicity, and survival were reported with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up. Pre- and posttransplant outcomes were analyzed in a subset of patients who completed SBRT as a bridge to liver transplant. Model of End-Stage Liver Disease was used to score hepatic function before and after SBRT completion. Results: With a median follow-up of 32 months, 45 patients (58 lesions) with HCC and CP-B/C cirrhosis received SBRT to a median dose of 45 Gy (3-5 fractions). FLV loss (34%, P < .001) was observed in all patients, and the functional and anatomic liver volumes matched well in a control group of noncirrhotic/non-HCC patients. Despite marked functional parenchyma retraction, the amount of FLV on SPECT exposed to the threshold irradiation was significantly less than the CT liver volumes (P < .001) because of the optimized beam placement during dosimetry planning. Twenty-three patients (51%) successfully completed orthotopic liver transplant, with a median time to transplant of 9.2 months. With 91% in-field local control, the overall 2-year survival was 65% (90% after the orthotopic liver transplant), with no incidence of radiation-induced liver disease observed within 3 to 4 months or accelerated CP class migration from B to C within the first 6 months post-SBRT. Mean Model of End-Stage Liver Disease-Na score was not significantly elevated at 3-month intervals after SBRT completion. Conclusions: Functional treatment planning with 99mTc sulfur colloid SPECT/CT allows identification and avoidance of functional hepatic parenchyma in patients with CP-B/C cirrhosis, leading to low toxicity and satisfactory transplant outcomes.

Autologous Islet Transplantation After Total Pancreatectomy in a Patient Recovered from SARS-CoV-2: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 disease has been linked to the onset of diabetes and metabolic dysregulation because it has been suggested that viral entry proteins, specifically ACE2 and TMPRSS2, are expressed in the exocrine cells and ductal epithelium of the pancreas. Because of the unknown effect this can have on islet function, there can be doubt that patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infections are good candidates for autologous islet transplantation after total pancreatectomy (TPAIT). CASE REPORT A patient with a history of chronic pancreatitis and previous non-surgical interventions was presented as a viable candidate for TPAIT at our institution. Approximately 1 month later, the patient contracted a SARS-CoV-2 infection, resulting in a mild case of COVID-19. The infection resolved without the need for hospitalization. At the time of this occurrence, COVID-19 was primarily considered a respiratory ailment, and little was known of the potential association between metabolic dysfunction and SARS-CoV-2. Islet isolation and surgery proceeded in a textbook manner with no surgical complications. The patient was weaned off exogenous insulin within 3 months after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS Favorable outcomes after surgery included pain reduction, islet function, and improved quality of life for the patient in the first 6 months after the procedure. These successful results demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection did not prevent the patient from achieving good glucose regulation after auto-islet transplantation. This outcome suggests that, at least in this instance of mild infection, there were no long-lasting negative COVID-19-associated effects on the transplanted islets that might impact islet function.

Is Continuing Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Therapy Safe Prior to Kidney Transplantation?

BACKGROUND Patients undergoing kidney transplantation are often placed on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, and their perioperative management is often challenging. This study aimed to determine the safety of continuing anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy prior to kidney transplantation. The primary outcome was bleeding after transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients who underwent kidney transplantation between January 2017 and July 2019 were included and divided into 3 groups: pretransplant anticoagulation with warfarin (WARF; n=23); pretransplant antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel/aspirin (ASA/CLOP; n=32); and control (CTL; n=197). Patients received kidneys from live or deceased donors. Preoperative INRs and platelet counts were compared to ensure therapeutic anticoagulation in the warfarin group and no significant platelet count variation among groups. The primary outcome was graft exploration for bleeding at 3 and 6 months after transplantation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative transfusion requirements, prolonged length of stay (>7 days), and outcomes at 3 and 6 months after transplantation, including hemodialysis and rejection rates and creatinine levels. RESULTS Pretransplant INR was significantly greater in the warfarin group (CTL 1.1, WARF 2.2, ASA/CLOP 1.2; P<0.01). There were no differences in pretransplant platelet count (CTL 202×10³, WARF 186×10³, ASA/CLOP 194×10³; P=0.31), graft exploration for bleeding at 3 (CTL 3%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 3%; P=0.69) and 6 months after transplantation (CTL 1%, WARF 4%, ASA/CLOP 0%; P=0.12), or perioperative blood transfusion requirements (CTL 4%, WARF 4%, ASA/CLOP 14%; P=0.13). Prolonged length of stay was similar (CTL 24%, WARF 26%, ASA/CLOP 44%; P=0.08). There were no significant differences among groups at 3 months in dialysis (CTL 2%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 0%; P=0.71), creatinine (CTL 1.5 mg/dL, WARF 1.7 mg/dL, ASA/CLOP 1.7; P=0.13), or rejection (CTL 6%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 0%) or at 6 months in dialysis (CTL 3%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 0%; P=0.49), creatinine (CTL 1.5 mg/dL, WARF 1.7 mg/dL, ASA/CLOP 1.5; P=0.49), or rejection (CTL 1%, WARF 0%, ASA/CLOP 3%). CONCLUSIONS Continuing anticoagulation or antiplatelet was safe in not increasing bleeding complications or perioperative transfusion requirements. Outcomes were similar at 3 and 6 months among groups. This strategy avoids exposing patients to risk of thrombosis if treatment is held and simplifies proceeding to transplantation.

Robotic enucleation of a biliary adenofibroma.

A 69-year-old man was referred to the hepatobiliary surgeons for mild enlargement of an asymptomatic cystic liver lesion found on routine screening in 2017 that measured 3.7×3.6×4.3 cm. Work-up with MRI revealed a complex multilocular cyst that had enlarged to 6.6×5.5×4.6 cm. Other work-up was unremarkable. He had a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 1; therefore, a surgical excision was planned due to the possibility for malignancy. A robotic approach with enucleation of the lesion was undertaken, with plans for return for a wider resection if pathological examination revealed malignancy. The lesion was noted to be a biliary adenofibroma, an exceptionally rare lesion that is thought to be benign, but requires excision due to potential malignant degeneration. The patient was discharged home the following day and has had minimal pain in his postoperative course.

Liver transplant mortality and morbidity following preoperative radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) can be used for tumor downstaging and as a bridge to transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its effect on surgical complications is unknown. Therefore, we investigated post-transplant mortality and acute readmission rates in HCC with and without preoperative RT using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS: After exclusion, 11,091 transplant patients were analyzed, 165 of whom received RT prior to transplant. Multivariable binomial logistic regression analysis identified characteristics associated with use of RT, and factors associated with increased 30/90-day mortality and 30-day readmission, following propensity matching. RESULTS: Although RT (median 40 Gy in 5 fractions) was more often delivered to larger tumors and advanced stages, it resulted in 59% downstaging rate, 39% pathologic complete response rate, and a median of 4 additional months to transplantation. Crude 30/90-day mortality rates were both 1.2% with preoperative RT, compared to 2.7% and 4.4% without. The 30-day readmission rate was 5.5% with RT and 10.7% without it. Propensity matched analysis demonstrated no statistical differences in 30/90-day mortality and a lower 30-day readmission rate with preoperative RT. Age >58, stage III disease, lack of transarterial chemoembolization, and shorter time to transplant independently predicted higher 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Preoperative RT for HCC did not increase postoperative mortality or length of stay following liver transplant.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A New Strategy for Loco-Regional Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma While Awaiting Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Trans-arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation are commonly used for control of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on liver transplant (LTx) waiting list. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) was introduced to our institution for HCC as a bridging or downsizing therapy to LTx. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five HCC lesions in 22 patients were treated with SBRT while waiting for LTx from January 2010 to December 2015. Nineteen of these patients received deceased donor LTx. SBRT was defined as 40-50 Gy delivered in 4-6 fractions. Pre- and post-liver transplant outcome were analyzed in addition to the dropout rate and tumor response to SBRT. RESULTS: Median size of original tumors was 3.2 cm (2.0-8.9), and median size of tumor after SBRT was significantly smaller at 0.9 cm (0-3.2) in the explanted livers (p < 0.01). The dropout rate was 9%, and they were only downsized patients outside of Milan criteria. Liver disease did not progress between pre- and post-SBRT except one patient. Twenty-eight percent of treated HCCs showed complete pathologic response, and 22% had extensive partial response with some residual tumor. No HCC recurrence was experienced after LTx. CONCLUSION: SBRT is indicated to be safe, effective treatment for HCC on LTx waiting list, and it leads to satisfactory post-liver transplant outcomes.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy used as a bridge to liver transplant in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh score ≥8 cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: To report on SBRT as a bridge to OLT for patients with HCC and Child-Pugh ≥8 cirrhosis. METHODS: Retrospective review of 15 patients, treated from 2010-2017. Three patients excluded secondary to delisting from prohibitive substance. Twelve patients (17 lesions) included for final analysis. Hepatic SPECT functional treatment planning utilized. RESULTS: The median age of 60 years with a median CP 9 and MELD 14. The median SBRT dose was 40 Gy in 5 fractions, and median tumor size was 2.3cm (1.2-5.3cm). Median follow-up and survival was 40-months and 46-months, respectively. One patient succumbed to renal/hepatic failure before OLT. Radiographic response was 80%. pCR at explant was 46%. No grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities. Median time to progression of CP ≥ 2 was 9.7-months and MELD progression was not met before OLT. CONCLUSION: SBRT with functional treatment planning can be used safely as a bridge to OLT in select patients with CP ≥8 cirrhosis.

Intercostal and Glissonian Pedicle Approach in Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Bilobar Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Bilobar liver metastasis is challenging for laparoscopic liver resection. Especially, subphrenic liver tumors in S7 or S8 are technically difficult to be resected out because the space is limited and the angle of instruments to lesions cannot be perpendicular.1,2 Major liver lobectomy is also challenging for laparoscopic liver resection. Glissonian pedicle approach has benefit that any variation of vascular and bile duct elements does not need to be considered in the hepatoduodenal ligament under the hilar plate. Glissonian pedicle approach is simpler and faster than individual dissection of hepatoduodenal ligament. METHODS: This video illustrates a hand-assisted laparoscopic left lobectomy and partial liver resection of S8 in a 48-year-old male with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver. He received 6 cycle of FOLFOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patient was positioned in semi left lateral decubitus so that a lesion in S8 was easily approached. A tumor in S8 was approached after right lobe mobilization. The liver resection was performed by a harmonic scalpel. A 5-mm balloon port was placed in 6th intercostal space to approach the lesion perpendicular. For left hepatectomy, glissonian pedicle approach was applied to control vascular inflow. Dissections was performed at bifurcation on the right glissonian and left glissonian pedicles. Dissection direction to the left side was above hepatogastric ligament. The tunnel was created including all left glissonian sheath, and a vessel loop was taped. An endovascular stapler was inserted and fired with dividing the left glissonian pedicle as en bloc. Hepatic parenchymal dissection was performed by the harmonic scalpel. Left hepatic vein was divided using an endoscopic vascular stapler. The specimens were removed from a hand-port. RESULTS: The operative time was 290 min. Blood loss was 250 ml, and no blood transfusion was required. He resumed a regular diet the next day and was discharged on postoperative day 4. CONCLUSIONS: Intercostal approach is useful for subphrenic liver tumors, and glissonian pedicle approach is also useful for major lobectomy for laparoscopic liver resection.

Younger Age is an Independent Factor for Graft Weight Overestimation: Analysis of the Clinical Impact on Recipient Outcomes in 340 Japanese Living Liver Donors.

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative estimation of graft weight is essential for improving outcomes in living donor liver transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective study sought to identify factors associated with graft weight overestimation. From April 2006 to August 2015, 340 living donors were assigned to no-overestimate (n = 284) or overestimate (n = 56) groups. We defined graft weight overestimation as a discrepancy ≥15% between estimated graft volume and actual graft weight. Donor data were compared, and associated factors for graft weight overestimation were analyzed. Recipient outcomes were compared between the groups according to identified factors. RESULTS: Donors were significantly younger in the overestimate group than in the no-overestimate group (35.0 vs. 46.0 years; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified donor age <45 years as an independent risk factor for graft weight overestimation (odds ratio 2.068; 95% confidence interval 1.114-3.839; p = 0.021). Among recipients with donors <45 years (n = 168), incidence of small-for-size dysfunction (SFSD) was significantly higher in the overestimate group than in the no-overestimate group (7/37 patients vs. 7/131 patients; p = 0.016); no significant difference was observed among recipients with donors ≥45 years (n = 172). First-year mortality was lower in SFSD recipients with donors <45 years (14.3 vs. 60.9%, p = 0.007). Among recipients with younger donors, graft survival was not significantly different between overestimate and no-overestimate groups. CONCLUSIONS: Younger donor age was an independent risk factor for graft weight overestimation leading to SFSD in recipients, but did not impair graft survival.

Liver graft preservation using perfluorocarbon improves the outcomes of simulated donation after cardiac death liver transplantation in rats.

The outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors remain poor due to severe warm ischemia injury. Perfluorocarbon (PFC) is a novel compound with high oxygen carrying capacity. In the present study, a rat model simulating DCD LT was used, and the impact of improved graft oxygenation provided by PFC addition on liver ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) and survival after DCD LT was investigated. Orthotopic liver transplants were performed in male Lewis rats, using DCD liver grafts preserved with cold University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in the control group and preserved with cold oxygenated UW solution with addition of 20% PFC in the PFC group. For experiment I, in a 30-minute donor warm ischemia model, postoperative graft injury was analyzed at 3 and 6 hours after transplantation. For experiment II, in a 50-minute donor warm ischemia model, the postoperative survival was assessed. For experiment I, the levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, hyaluronic acid, malondialdehyde, and several inflammatory cytokines were significantly lower in the PFC group. The hepatic expression levels of tumor necrosis factor α and interleukin 6 were significantly lower, and the expression level of heme oxygenase 1 was significantly higher in the PFC group. Histological analysis showed significantly less necrosis and apoptosis in the PFC group. Sinusoidal endothelial cells and microvilli of the bile canaliculi were well preserved in the PFC group. For experiment II, the postoperative survival rate was significantly improved in the PFC group. In conclusion, graft preservation with PFC attenuated liver IRI and improved postoperative survival. This graft preservation protocol might be a new therapeutic option to improve the outcomes of DCD LT. Liver Transplantation 23 1171-1185 2017 AASLD.

Hepatocellular carcinoma with child Pugh-A Cirrhosis treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy.

AIM: To evaluate the control, survival, and hepatic function for Child Pugh (CP)-A patients after Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: From 2009 to 2016, 40 patients with Barcelona Liver Clinic (BCLC) stages 0-B HCC and CP-A cirrhosis completed liver SBRT. The mean prescription dose was 45 Gy (40 to 50 Gy in 4-5 fractions). Local relapse, defined as recurrence within the planning target volume was assessed with intravenous multiphase contrast computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging every 4-6 mo after completion of SBRT. Progression of cirrhosis was evaluated by CP and Model for End Stage Liver Disease scores every 3-4 mo. Toxicities were graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v4.03). Median follow-up was 24 mo. RESULTS: Forty-nine HCC lesions among 40 patients were analyzed in this IRB approved retrospective study. Median tumor diameter was 3.5 cm (1.5-8.9 cm). Six patients with tumors ≥ 5 cm completed planned selected transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with SBRT. Eight patients underwent orthotropic live transplant (OLT) with SBRT as a bridging treatment (median time to transplant was 12 mo, range 5 to 23 mo). The Pathologic complete response (PCR) rate in this group was 62.5%. The 2-year in-field local control was 98% (1 failure). Intrahepatic control was 82% and 62% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was 92% and 60% at 1 and 2 years, with a median survival of 41 mo per Kaplan Meier analysis. At 1 and 2 years, 71% and 61% of patients retained CPA status. Of the patients with intrahepatic failures, 58% developed progressive cirrhosis, compared to 27% with controlled disease (P = 0.06). Survival specific to hepatic failure was 92%, 81%, and 69% at 12, 18, and 24 mo. There was no grade 3 or higher toxicity. On univariate analysis, gross tumor volume (GTV) < 23 cc was associated with freedom from CP progression (P = 0.05), hepatic failure-specific survival (P = 0.02), and trended with OS (P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: SBRT is safe and effective in HCC with early cirrhosis and may extend waiting time for transplant in patients who may not otherwise be immediate candidates.

Oral administration of polyamines ameliorates liver ischemia/reperfusion injury and promotes liver regeneration in rats.

Polyamines are essential for cell growth and differentiation. They play important roles in protection from liver damage and promotion of liver regeneration. However, little is known about the effect of oral exogenous polyamine administration on liver damage and regeneration. This study investigated the impact of polyamines (spermidine and spermine) on ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) and liver regeneration. We used a rat model in which a 70% hepatectomy after 40 minutes of ischemia was performed to mimic the clinical condition of living donor partial liver transplantation (LT). Male Lewis rats were separated into 2 groups: a polyamine group given polyamines before and after operation as treatment and a vehicle group given distilled water as placebo. The levels of serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase at 6, 24, and 48 hours after reperfusion were significantly lower in the polyamine group compared with those in the vehicle group. Polyamine treatment reduced the expression of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines at 6 hours after reperfusion. Histological analysis showed significantly less necrosis and apoptosis in the polyamine group at 6 hours after reperfusion. Sinusoidal endothelial cells were also well preserved in the polyamine group. In addition, the regeneration of the remnant liver at 24, 48, and 168 hours after reperfusion was significantly accelerated, and the Ki-67 labeling index and the expressions of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein at 24 hours after reperfusion were significantly higher in the polyamine group compared with those in the vehicle group. In conclusion, perioperative oral polyamine administration attenuates liver IRI and promotes liver regeneration. It might be a new therapeutic option to improve the outcomes of partial LT. Liver Transplantation 22 1231-1244 2016 AASLD.

How far can we lower graft-to-recipient weight ratio for living donor liver transplantation under modulation of portal venous pressure?

BACKGROUND: Smaller size grafts for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can enhance donor safety and expand donor availability. We previously reported that modulation of portal venous pressure (PVP) was key for successful LDLT with small grafts, and that it actively lowered graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for adult-to-adult LDLT. This retrospective study investigated the outcome of LDLT using small grafts with PVP modulation. METHOD: This study analyzed 221 adult LDLT patients between March 2008 and December 2013 and divided them into 3 groups based on GRWR: large (L), GRWR ≥ 0.8% (n = 154), medium (M), ≥ 0.7% GRWR < 0.8% (n = 38); and small (S) GRWR < 0.7% (n = 29). Donor and recipient factors, PVP, pressure gradient between PVP and central venous pressure (CVP), occurrence of small for size syndrome (SFSS), ascites, and posttransplant laboratory data were compared across the 3 groups. Patient and graft survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: There was no difference in patient or graft survival between the 3 groups. Amount of posttransplant ascites and posttransplant International Normalized Ratio were similar, but the S and M groups had more prolonged cholestasis. SFSS was identified in 17%, 13%, and 13% in the S, M, and L groups, respectively (P = NS). Patients with a final PVP of ≤15 mmHg had better survival than patients with a final PVP of >15 mmHg (P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that donor age >40 years old, final PVP of >15 mmHg, and pressure gradient of PVP-CVP >5 mmHg were risk factors for inferior patient survival. CONCLUSION: We achieved satisfactory outcomes in LDLT with GRWR as low as 0.6% using PVP modulation. Thus, we currently set a lower limit of GRWR at 0.6% while protecting donor safety and expanding donor availability.

Liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child-Pugh A and B.

PURPOSE: To investigate the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Child-Pugh A/B patients and the usefulness of our expanded selection criteria, the Kyoto criteria. METHODS: A total of 82 recipients with a Child-Pugh class A (n = 27) or B (n = 55) status having either multiple hepatic nodules or solitary tumors ≥5 cm in size treated between February 1999 and August 2012 were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate was significantly less for the Child-Pugh B patients than for the Child-Pugh A patients (P = 0.042), while the survival rates did not differ. In the Child-Pugh A and B patients, the survival rate was significantly greater, while the recurrence rate was lower among the patients meeting the Kyoto criteria than those exceeding these criteria (P = 0.006, P = 0.001, P = 0.032 and P < 0.001, respectively). In the Child-Pugh B patients, the overall survival and recurrence rates did not differ between the patients treated with and without pretreatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. In the Child-Pugh B patients treated with pretreatment, the overall survival rate was significantly greater, while the recurrence rate was lower among the patients meeting the Kyoto criteria than those exceeding these criteria (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Living donor liver transplantation performed within the Kyoto criteria achieves excellent overall survival and recurrence rates, especially for Child-Pugh B patients, even those with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Portal vein reconstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation for patients with portal vein thrombosis in single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) used to be contraindicated in patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). In comparison to deceased donor LT, living donor LT (LDLT) still presents additional difficulties in determining appropriate vein grafts and overcoming small-for-size syndrome. Here, we introduce our LDLT strategies and assess their outcomes in adult patients with pre-existing PVT. METHODS: We performed 282 consecutive adult LDLTs between April 2006 and December 2011. Forty-eight patients (17%) had pre-existing PVT (grade I; 15, II; 20, III; 12, IV; 1). RESULTS: Our preferred treatments for PVT were thrombectomies/thromboendovenectomies in 30 patients, replaced grafts in seven, jump grafts in seven, renoportal anastomosis in one and no surgical intervention owing to minimal thrombosis in three. Post-transplant portal vein complications occurred in eight of 48 (17%) cases, which were treated by surgery, anticoagulation therapy, and/or interventional radiology. Post-transplant survival rates of patients with preexisting PVT at 1 year and 5 years were comparable to a PVT-free cohort (1 year; 81% vs. 77%, 5 years; 81% vs. 73%). CONCLUSIONS: The excellent survival rates in patients with PVT who underwent LDLT could be attributed to our strategies, which included surgical techniques and timely treatment of postoperative complications.

Impact of elderly donors for liver transplantation: A single-center experience.

Elderly donor grafts for liver transplantation (LT) are recognized to be marginal grafts. The present study investigated the impact of using elderly donors for LT. Between June 1990 and August 2012, 1631 patients received LT at Kyoto University Hospital. Out of 1631 patients, 1597 patients received living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), whereas the other 34 patients underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Seventy-five grafts that were used came from individuals who were ≥60 years old. We retrospectively analyzed the recipients' survival rates according to donor age. The overall survival rates of the recipients of all LDLT (P < 0.001), adult-to-adult LDLT (P = 0.007), all DDLT (P = 0.026), and adult-to-adult DDLT (P = 0.011) were significantly lower for the elderly donor group versus the younger group and especially for those who were hepatitis C-positive. A multivariate analysis revealed that donor age, ABO incompatibility, and preoperative intensive care unit stay were independent risk factors for poor patient survival in adult-to-adult LDLT. However, no significant differences existed between the 2 groups among those who received adult-to-adult LDLT in and after April 2006. No significant association was found between donor age and incidence of acute cellular rejection. In conclusion, donor age was closely related to the survival rate for LDLT and DDLT, although the impact of donor age was not shown in the recent cases.