Can Some Viral Respiratory Infections Observed Before the Pandemic Announcement Be Related to SARS-CoV-2?

OBJECTIVE: There have been doubts that SARS-CoV-2 has been circulating before the first case was announced. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibility of COVID-19 in some cases diagnosed to be viral respiratory tract infection in the pre-pandemic period in our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were admitted to our hospital's pulmonary diseases, infectious diseases, and intensive care clinics with the diagnosis of viral respiratory system infection within a 6-month period between October 2019 and March 12, 2020, were screened. Around 248 archived respiratory samples from these patients were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid by real-timequantitative polymerase chain reaction. The clinical, laboratory, and radiological data of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 47.5 (18-89 years); 103 (41.5%) were female and 145 (58.4%) were male. The most common presenting symptoms were cough in 51.6% (n = 128), fever in 42.7% (n = 106), and sputum in 27.0% (n = 67). Sixty-nine percent (n = 172) of the patients were pre-diagnosed to have upper respiratory tract infection and 22.0% (n = 55) had pneumonia, one-third of the patients (n = 84, 33.8%) were followed in the service. Respiratory viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 123 (49.6%) patients. Influenza virus (31.9%), rhinovirus (10.5%), and human metapneumovirus (6.5%) were the most common pathogens, while none of the samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Findings that could be significant for COVID-19 pneumonia were detected in the thorax computed tomography of 7 cases. CONCLUSION: The negative SARS-CoV-2 real-time-quantitative polymerase chain reaction results in the respiratory samples of the cases followed up in our hospital for viral pneumonia during the pre-pandemic period support that there was no COVID-19 among our cases during the period in question. However, if clinical suspicion arises, both SARS and non-SARS respiratory viral pathogens should be considered for differential diagnosis.

The Safety of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Mode in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Preliminary Study.

OBJECTIVE: The most appropriate ventilatory mode during fiberoptic bronchoscopy is still not yet known clearly for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Airway pressure release ventilation is used as a recovery treatment for patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the safety of the fiberoptic bronchoscopy process in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome ventilated with airway pressure release ventilation mode and its effect on gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center retrospective observational study was performed in the intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center from September 2018 to November 2019. Patients with severe ARDS ventilated with APRV mode and undergoing FB were included. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed by an expert intensivist-pulmonologist. All ventilator parameters set by the clinician were kept stable, and no change was made other than O2 concentration. The mechanical ventilation parameters and arterial blood gas values before and after the procedure and fiberoptic bronchoscopy-related complications were recorded for the first 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 14 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients who were ventilated with airway pressure release ventilation were enrolled. No significant deteriorations were detected in gas exchange, pulmonary compliance, and airway resistance values in our case series. It was observed that a small reduction in PaO2 and an increase in PaCO2 were present after the 1st hour; however, both were returned to baseline values in the 24th hour. Only 1 patient developed fiberoptic bronchoscopy-induced hypoxemia (7.1%). Complications, such as fiberoptic bronchoscopy-induced barotrauma, pneumothorax, hemodynamic deterioration, and bleeding, were not detected. CONCLUSION: According to our preliminary findings, performing fiberoptic bronchoscopy under airway pressure release ventilation mode by an experienced bronchoscopist does not bring additional complication risks in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Fungal colonization and infections in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units: A real-life experience at a tertiary-care hospital.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the management of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care units (ICUs) with fungal infection/colonization and to highlight diagnostic problems in these patients. METHODS: We included all patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis who were aged ≥18 years and followed in the ICU for the first 8 months. Patient data were obtained from medical records. We compared the risk factors, laboratory data, and outcomes of patients with fungal infection/colonization. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients (81 men and 37 women) were included. The mean age was 70.3 ± 14.8 (35-94) years. Of the patients, 79 (66.9%) patients were ≥65 years old. Fungal infection/colonization was detected in 39 (33.1%) patients. Fungi were isolated from 34 (28.8%) patients. Ten fungal species were isolated from 51 samples (the most common being Candida albicans). Three patients (2.5%) had proven candidemia. We observed two (1.7%) possible cases of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Eighteen patients (15.3%) underwent antifungal therapy. The risk of fungal infection/colonization increased as the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation increased. The fatality rate was 61.9% and increased with age and the use of mechanical ventilation. The fatality rate was 4.2-times-higher and the use of mechanical ventilation was 35.9-times-higher in the patients aged ≥65 years than in the patients aged <65 years. No relationship was found between fungal colonization/infection, antifungal treatment, and the fatality rate. CONCLUSION: During the pandemic, approximately one-third of the patients in ICUs exhibited fungal infection/colonization. Candida albicans was the most common species of fungal infection as in the pre-pandemic area. Because of the cross-contamination risk, we did not performed diagnostic bronchoscopy and control thorax computed tomography during the ICU stay, and our patients mainly received empirical antifungal therapy.

The Impact of Mechanical Ventilation Modes on Complications of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in Critically Ill Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy are not elucidated in different mechanical ventilation modes. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of fiberoptic bronchoscopy on lung mechanics, ventilation parameters, and gas exchange in 2 often-used modes, volume control and pressure control, in invasively ventilated patients followed up in the intensive care unit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eligible patients were screened and included in the study after intensive care unit-fiberoptic bronchoscopy database search. Patients who underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy under volume control and pressure control mechanical ventilation modes were compared. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any complication within the first 24 hours after the procedure, and secondary outcomes were changes in lung mechanics (dynamic lung compliance and airway resistance) and gas exchange (arterial partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide). RESULTS: A total of 61 patients (median age: 69 years, 60.7% male) were included. Twenty-nine (47.5%) patients were ventilated in volume control mode and 32 (52.5%) in pressure control mode during the fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure, and the median (interquartile range) duration of the procedure was 9 [8-11] minutes. Baseline dynamic lung compliance, airway resistance, arterial partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and the fraction of inspired O2 were similar in both groups. After fiberoptic bronchoscopy, dynamic lung compliance decreased in both groups, and airway resistance and peak airway pressures increased but reached pre-fiberoptic bronchoscopy values at the 1st hour after the procedure. No significant differences were detected in both groups in terms of blood gas values and lung mechanics in the 1st and 24th hours after the procedure. In both groups, the 24th hour fraction of inspired O2 was the same as the pre-fiberoptic bronchoscopy values, but the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen and the fraction of inspired O2 improved. No complications developed in patients within 24 hours after the procedure. CONCLUSION: No differences were detected in terms of gas exchange and pulmonary mechanics, and complications in volume control and pressure control modes in critically ill intubated patients.