Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery requires the surgeon to assume atypical postures for extended periods of time, potentially leading to fatigue and chronic injury. This study assessed the level of muscle activity and compared the effects of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: Four attending and four resident surgeons repeated a series of four tasks with a View site and a standard operating room monitor. Electromyography (EMG) activity and muscular discomfort scores were obtained before and after a "fatigue session." Two variables, the EMG amplitudes and discomfort scores, were analyzed. RESULTS: The EMG amplitudes generally exceed the recommended threshold limits of acceptable muscular load. EMG data and discomfort scores demonstrated a fatigue response in several muscle groups. Minimal differences between the two monitor positions were seen. Overall, the EMG data and discomfort scores showed less muscle activity and discomfort in the attending surgeons. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery required a relatively high muscular load, putting surgeons at risk for fatigue and injury. Altering the monitor placement did not reduce the surgeon's risk of fatigue. Experience slightly reduced the level of fatigue, but not enough to reduce the surgeon's risk category.

Preoperative gait comparisons between adults undergoing long spinal deformity fusion surgery (thoracic to L4, L5, or sacrum) and controls.

STUDY DESIGN: This investigation compared the gait of revision and primary spinal deformity patients about to undergo surgical reconstruction with that of a group of able-bodied controls. OBJECTIVES: The hypothesis of the study was that both patient groups would have significantly compromised gait, spine motion, and gait endurance compared with the able-bodied group. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a population of adults with degenerative changes superimposed on idiopathic scoliosis who present for reconstructive spinal surgery (primary patients). There is another group of adults who have already had spinal deformity surgery and present for revision surgery (revision patients). METHODS: Twenty-seven women were recruited (8 primary, 13 revision, 6 able-bodied controls). A typical gait analysis was performed. Walking endurance was estimated from a submaximal graded treadmill exercise test. Three motion variables describing the orientation of the shoulders with respect to the pelvis in the three principal planes of the body were determined. Also, gait speed, stride length, cadence, and step width were calculated. The variable for the endurance test was the length of time walked on the treadmill. RESULTS: Results for the revision group indicated a slower walking speed, greater sagittal plane trunk flexion, reduced range of motion in the coronal and transverse planes, and poorer endurance relative to age-matched controls. The primary group demonstrated a slower walking speed relative to age-matched controls. The revision group had poorer endurance scores relative to the primary group. CONCLUSION: This investigation is an objective report describing the compromised gait and walking endurance of adult patients with spinal deformity before spinal fusion surgery. Results supported subjective observations regarding the preoperative gait of these patients and presented results difficult to observe in a clinical setting. The techniques appear useful in providing objective information regarding the gait abilities of these patients.