Electro-clinical criteria and surgical outcome: Is there a difference between mesial and lesional temporal lobe epilepsy?

OBJECTIVES: Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy syndrome (MTLE) with specific electrophysiological and clinical characteristics and hippocampal sclerosis (HS) on MRI is considered the prototype of a syndrome with good surgical prognosis. Ictal onset zones in MTLE have been found to extend outside the hippocampus and neocortical seizures often involve mesial structures. It can, thus, be questioned whether MTLE with HS is different from lesional temporal epilepsies with respect to electro-clinical characteristics and surgical prognosis. We assessed whether MTLE with HS is distinguishable from lesional TLE and which criteria determine surgical outcome. METHODS: People in a retrospective cohort of 389 individuals with MRI abnormalities who underwent temporal lobectomy, were divided into "HS only" or "lesional" TLEs. Twenty-six presented with dual pathology and were excluded from further analysis. We compared surgical outcome and electro-clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Over half (61%) had "HS only." Four electro-clinical characteristics (age at epilepsy onset, febrile seizures, memory dysfunction and contralateral dystonic posturing) distinguished "HS only" from "lesional" TLE, but there was considerable overlap. Seizure freedom 2 years after surgery (Engel class 1) was similar: 67% ("HS only") vs 69% ("lesional" TLE). Neither presence of HS nor electro-clinical criteria was associated with surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Despite small differences in electrophysiological and clinical characteristics between MTLE with HS and lesional TLE, surgical outcomes are similar, indicating that aetiology seems irrelevant in the referral for temporal surgery.

Anti-epileptic drug changes and quality of life in the community.

OBJECTIVE: Changes in anti-epileptic drug (AED) regimens may indicate unsatisfactory treatment results such as insufficient seizure control or adverse effects. This inference underlies epilepsy management and research, yet current studies often do not account for AED changes. We assessed AED change patterns and their association with quality of life (QoL), as main outcome measure, in a community-based setting. METHODS: We assessed a cohort of 248 people with epilepsy identified from community pharmacy records from whom we retrieved AED dispensing history. We assessed all changes in AED use during the 2 years prior to the index date and current QoL using the validated Dutch QOLIE-31 questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty-one per cent had at least one AED change during the study period, either in drug type or dose. People who changed showed significantly lower QoL (QOLIE score 73 vs 79), especially those who intensified their treatment. Each additional change was associated with a further reduction of 4.9 points in QoL score. CONCLUSIONS: AED changes are common practice, even in people with long-standing epilepsy. Frequent changes, as objective measure of epilepsy severity, are associated with a progressively lower QoL. Changes, even in dose, should be monitored in daily clinical practice and used as a red flag that may require adjustments in epilepsy management. This may include earlier referral to a specialized centre for a more thorough evaluation or counselling. AED changes can also be used as an outcome marker in epilepsy research as a proxy of QoL for better translation of drug-efficacy results to general practice.

Adjustment of treatment increases quality of life in patients with epilepsy: a randomized controlled pragmatic trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Complaints about side-effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may be overlooked in clinical practice. We assessed the value and risks of an active intervention policy for reported complaints in a randomized controlled pragmatic trial. METHODS: This randomized controlled pragmatic trial included 111 adults treated for epilepsy in seven general hospitals. They were considered well-managed by their treating physician, but reported moderate to severe complaints on a questionnaire (SIDAED, assessing SIDe effects in AED treatment). The intervention was adjustment of AED treatment (53 patients), either reduction of dose or switch of AED, versus continuation of treatment unchanged (58 control patients) during 7 months. Primary outcomes were quality of life (Qolie-10) and complaints score. Secondary outcome measures were the occurrence of seizures or adverse events. RESULTS: After 7 months, the relative risk (RR) for improvement in quality of life was 1.80 (1.04-3.12) for the intervention group compared to control and the RR of decrease in complaints was 1.34 (0.88-2.05). In 58% of patients randomized to adjustment, the medication had indeed been changed. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, despite a possible risk of seizure recurrence, adjustment of drug treatment in well-managed patients with epilepsy, who report considerable complaints, improves the quality of life.

The intracarotid amobarbital or Wada test: unilateral or bilateral?

OBJECTIVE: In the Netherlands, presurgical screening for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) includes the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP), consisting of two consecutive injections of amobarbital, ipsilateral and contralateral to the epileptic focus. We studied whether a bilateral IAP has added value to a unilateral, ipsilateral IAP. METHODS: This population-based study included 183 consecutive patients referred for screening for TLE surgery who underwent bilateral IAP. Using multivariable modeling, we assessed the added value of bilateral IAP on the decision for surgery, resection size, amygdalohippocampectomy, post-operative seizure freedom, memory performance, and IQ change. RESULTS: Given the results from the unilateral IAP, the bilateral IAP had added prognostic value for postoperative change in verbal memory (P < 0.01) and verbal IQ (P < 0.01), especially if patients had a left-sided focus. In contrast, information provided by the contralateral IAP was not associated with decision-making or surgical strategy. CONCLUSIONS: A bilateral IAP has added value in predicting post-operative verbal memory and IQ. A bilateral IAP is currently not used to guide surgical strategy, but may be used for this purpose when verbal capacity is of particular concern in patients with a left-sided focus. In other cases, IAP is best performed unilaterally.

A cross-sectional study of subjective complaints in patients with epilepsy who seem to be well-controlled with anti-epileptic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: Side-effects of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) may be overlooked in patients with epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and severity of subjective complaints in patients who were considered to be well-controlled and to assess whether these complaints are related to medication, personality traits, or other determinants. METHODS: We included patients with epilepsy who were considered to be well-controlled in a cross-sectional study in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. Their medication had not been changed for six months and an apparent reason to change the medication was lacking at the time of enrolment. Subjective complaints were assessed with a 46-item questionnaire. Using multivariable linear regression modeling, we assessed whether patient characteristics, epilepsy characteristics, medication, quality of life (Qolie-10), and personality traits (SCL-90) explained the presence and severity of complaints. RESULTS: Of 173 included patients, 67% reported moderate to severe subjective complaints on the questionnaire. Cognitive complaints were reported most frequently. Multivariate modeling showed that 61% of the variance in reported complaints could be explained by included determinants. The prevalence and severity of complaints was associated with AED polytherapy and higher scores on psycho neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were considered to be well-controlled proved to report an unexpectedly high number of subjective complaints. Both medication and aspects of personality contributed to the level of complaints. Our study illustrates that subjective side-effects are easily overlooked in everyday clinical practice, possibly because in practice a generally phrased question is used to detect side-effects.

Training of the respiratory muscles in individuals with tetraplegia.

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental cross-sectional design. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether training of the innervated respiratory muscles in individuals with a (partial) cervical spinal cord injury will improve the strength and endurance capacity of these muscles and the exercise performance in these individuals. SETTING: Department of Physiology and Pulmonary diseases, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. METHOD: In this study nine individuals with tetraplegia (C3 C7) performed a target flow endurance training of the inspiratory muscles, twice a day for 15 min. First, the subjects performed a 'sham' training for 6 weeks with no appreciable resistance, after that they performed a 'real' training for 6 weeks with a resistance of 70% of the maximal endurance capacity of the inspiratory muscles. The training was evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 weeks by the following tests: (1) the slow Inspiratory Vital Capacity (IVC) and the Forced Inspiratory and Expiratory Volumes over 1 s (FIV1 and FEV1); (2) the Maximal Inspiratory Mouth Pressure (Pimax) and the Endurance Pressure (Pendu) and (3) a maximal arm-cranking exercise test. RESULTS: After the sham training, the Pendu was increased from 3.98 to 4.71 kPa with a P-value of 0.05. The sham training had no influence on any of the other variables. The real training had no effect on the IVC, FIV1, FEV1 and Pimax, however, increased the Pendu from 4.71 to 6.16 kPa (P=0.01), representing the respiratory muscle-endurance capacity. The oxygen consumption (VO2 peak) in the maximal exercise test improved from 0.87 to 0.98 l/min (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of the study indicate that training of the respiratory muscles results in an enhanced endurance capacity of these muscles and a concomitant increase in the aerobic exercise performance.