Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(1 Pt A): 102017, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37544618

ABSTRACT

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have emerged as a new therapy for patients who need and can tolerate oral anticoagulation. DOACs were initially approved for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and treatment for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Ease of administration, no requirement of bridging with other anticoagulants, and less frequent dosing have made DOACs preferable choice for anticoagulation. Studies are showing promising results regarding use of DOACs beyond the common indications. Studies have been done to show the potential benefit of DOACs in valvular atrial fibrillation, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Data have shown safety as well as comparable bleeding incidences with DOACs compared to vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants. Naturally interest is growing to see the use of DOACs apart from the NVAF, DVT, or PE. Authors have highlighted various study results to show the potential beneficial role of DOACs in the above-mentioned situations.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Pulmonary Embolism , Stroke , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Administration, Oral
2.
Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab ; 13: 20420188221090001, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35450095

ABSTRACT

Several recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the wide clinical application of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in improving kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with native kidney disease. In April 2021, Dapagliflozin became the first SGLT2 inhibitor to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) regardless of diabetic status. However, while these agents have drawn much acclaim for their cardiovascular and nephroprotective effects among patients with native kidney disease, little is known about the safety and efficacy of SGLT2i in the kidney transplant setting. Many of the mechanisms by which SGLT2i exert their benefit stand to prove equally as efficacious or more so among kidney transplant recipients as they have in patients with CKD. However, safety concerns have excluded transplant recipients from all large RCTs, and clinicians and patients alike are left to wonder if the benefits of these amazing drugs outweigh the risks. In this review, we will discuss the known mechanisms SGLT2i exploit to provide their beneficial effects, the potential benefits, and risks of these agents in the context of kidney transplantation, and finally, we will discuss current findings of the published literature for SGLT2i use in kidney transplant recipients and propose potential directions for future research.

3.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 46(3): 100553, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32222319

ABSTRACT

Primary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important means to reduce the burden of the disease. Aspirin has been widely prescribed over the last several decades as part of primary CAD prevention strategy. However, 3 recent hallmark trials - ARRIVE, ASCEND and ASPREE have raised serious questions about this common practice. Although, aspirin reduced incidence of non-fatal MI and stroke in these recent studies, bleeding risk was higher. In the present era, where regular exercise, healthy diet, smoking cessation, and statins are used to manage the risk factors of CAD, additional prescription of aspirin seems more harmful than beneficial. The guidelines of major societies such as European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and American Heart Association (AHA) also reflect this shift. In this article, the authors aim to highlight the current evidence on aspirin use for primary prevention of CAD, in the context of evolving contrasting clinical trial data from the last 2 decades. We also highlight the pertinent sections of the most recent clinical guidelines of European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology, and American Heart Association in this article.


Subject(s)
Aspirin , Coronary Artery Disease , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Aspirin/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Primary Prevention , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...