Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein stimulates CD14-dependent Toll-like receptor 4 internalization and LPS-induced TBK1-IKKϵ-IRF3 axis activation.

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) is an indispensable immune receptor for lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a major component of the Gram-negative bacterial cell wall. Following LPS stimulation, TLR4 transmits the signal from the cell surface and becomes internalized in an endosome. However, the spatial regulation of TLR4 signaling is not fully understood. Here, we investigated the mechanisms of LPS-induced TLR4 internalization and clarified the roles of the extracellular LPS-binding molecules, LPS-binding protein (LBP), and glycerophosphatidylinositol-anchored protein (CD14). LPS stimulation of CD14-expressing cells induced TLR4 internalization in the presence of serum, and an inhibitory anti-LBP mAb blocked its internalization. Addition of LBP to serum-free cultures restored LPS-induced TLR4 internalization to comparable levels of serum. The secretory form of the CD14 (sCD14) induced internalization but required a much higher concentration than LBP. An inhibitory anti-sCD14 mAb was ineffective for serum-mediated internalization. LBP lacking the domain for LPS transfer to CD14 and a CD14 mutant with reduced LPS binding both attenuated TLR4 internalization. Accordingly, LBP is an essential serum molecule for TLR4 internalization, and its LPS transfer to membrane-anchored CD14 (mCD14) is a prerequisite. LBP induced the LPS-stimulated phosphorylation of TBK1, IKKϵ, and IRF3, leading to IFN-ß expression. However, LPS-stimulated late activation of NF-κB or necroptosis were not affected. Collectively, our results indicate that LBP controls LPS-induced TLR4 internalization, which induces TLR adaptor molecule 1 (TRIF)-dependent activation of the TBK1-IKKϵ-IRF3-IFN-ß pathway. In summary, we showed that LBP-mediated LPS transfer to mCD14 is required for serum-dependent TLR4 internalization and activation of the TRIF pathway.

An inhibitory epitope of human Toll-like receptor 4 resides on leucine-rich repeat 13 and is recognized by a monoclonal antibody.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced activation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) elicits the innate immune response and can trigger septic shock if excessive. Two antibodies (HT4 and HT52) inhibit LPS-induced human TLR4 activation via novel LPS binding-independent mechanisms. The HT52 epitope resides on leucine-rich repeat 2 (LRR2) and is a feature of many inhibitory antibodies; antigen specificity of HT4 does not reside in LRR2. Here, we identified an HT4 epitope on LRR13 located close to the TLR4 dimerization interface that plays a role in NFκB activation. HT4 and HT52 mutually enhanced TLR4 inhibition. LRR13 is a novel inhibitory epitope and may be useful for developing anti-TLR4 antibodies. Combination therapy with LRR2 and LRR13 may effectively inhibit TLR4 activation.

Leucine-rich repeat 2 of human Toll-like receptor 4 contains the binding site for inhibitory monoclonal antibodies.

Excessive activation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/MD-2 by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) causes septic shock. We previously produced an inhibitory antibody, HT52, against LPS-induced human TLR4 activation independently of LPS binding of MD-2. Consistent with the hypothesis that HT52 recognizes the epitopes inherent to inhibitory antibodies, we generated an HT52-crossblockable antibody and revealed the relationship between its inhibitory activity and the anti-TLR4 antibody epitope. Leucine-rich repeat 2 was identified as an inhibitory epitope, and Phe(75), Ser(76) and Pro(79) as antigenic determinants. These findings provide a way to design therapeutic antibodies targeted to TLR4 that are distinct from LPS analog antagonists targeting MD-2.

MD-2-dependent human Toll-like receptor 4 monoclonal antibodies detect extracellular association of Toll-like receptor 4 with extrinsic soluble MD-2 on the cell surface.

MD-2 is essential for lipopolysaccharide (LPS) recognition of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) but not for cell surface expression. The TLR4/MD-2 complex is formed intracellularly through co-expression. Extracellular complex formation remains a matter for debate because of the aggregative nature of secreted MD-2 in the absence of TLR4 co-expression. We demonstrated extracellular complex formation using three independent monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), all of which are specific for complexed TLR4 but unreactive with free TLR4 and MD-2. These mAbs bound to TLR4-expressing Ba/F3 cells only when co-cultured with MD-2-secreting Chinese hamster ovary cells or incubated with conditioned medium from these cells. All three mAbs bound the extracellularly formed complex indistinguishably from the intracellularly formed complex in titration studies. In addition, we demonstrated that two mAbs lost their affinity for TLR4/MD-2 on LPS stimulation, suggesting that these mAbs bound to conformation-sensitive epitopes. This was also found when the extracellularly formed complex was stimulated with LPS. Additionally, we showed that cell surface TLR4 and extrinsically secreted MD-2 are capable of forming the functional complex extracellularly, indicating an additional or alternative pathway for the complex formation.