The impact of sex, body mass index and chronic kidney disease on outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate 1) the relationship between body mass index (BMI), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); and 2) whether CKD modified the effect of BMI on major bleeding and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). BACKGROUND: The interaction of CKD, sex and BMI in patients undergoing PCI is unclear. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, a total of 31,116 patients underwent PCI at six New York metropolitan area hospitals. Bleeding complications were classified by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC). Major bleeding was defined as BARC≥3. MACCE was the composite of in-hospital death; myocardial infarction; cerebrovascular events and major bleeding complications. Interaction on multiplicative scales was assessed adjusting for other factors. A three-way multiplicative interaction between BMI, CKD and sex were considered and evaluated for both endpoints of primary interest (BARC≥3 and MACCE). RESULTS: Patients with BARC≥3 bleeding were older (p < 0.0001) and more likely female (p < 0.0001). A 3-way interaction existed between sex, BMI, and CKD on BARC≥3 (p = 0.02). Specifically, the effect of CKD status on odds of BARC≥3 depended on BMI group among males, whereas BMI did modify the relationship between CKD and BARC≥3 among females; after stratification by sex, a significant interaction between BMI and CKD was present in females (p = 0.03) but not in males (p = 0.43). Among females without CKD, normal BMI patients had the greatest odds of BARC≥3 compared to obese or overweight females. Contrasted to females without CKD, among females with CKD there was no significant increased odds of BARC≥3 in normal BMI patients compared to obese or overweight females. However, overweight females with CKD had a significantly increased odds of BARC≥3 compared to obese females with CKD. Furthermore, obese females with CKD had significantly greater BARC≥3 odds compared to obese females without CKD. Similarly, overweight females with CKD had an increased odds of BARC≥3 compared to overweight females without CKD. No significant interactions were found for the odds of MACCE. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing PCI, there was evidence of a significant and complex 3-way interaction between BMI, CKD and sex for major bleeding events. The predicted probability of major bleeding was greater for females than for male patients, and for both sexes, greater among those with CKD, but BMI group influences these probabilities. Obese females with kidney disease had the lowest incidence of bleeding complications when compared with overweight or normal weight female patients undergoing PCI. This interaction was not seen in the male group or for MACCE. Furthermore, age, cardiogenic shock, STEMI and use of IABP/Impella were each independently associated with odds of major bleeding (among both males and females) and MACCE.

Toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy: a review of current literature.

The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) design, first invented by Zelig Eshhar, paved the way for the use of genetically modified T-cells in targeted therapy against cancer cells. Since then, it has gone through many generations, especially with the integration of co-stimulation in the second and third-generation CARs. However, it also mounts a hyperactive immune response named as cytokine release syndrome with the release of several cytokines eventually resulting in multiple end-organ toxicities. The severity of cytokine release syndrome depends upon certain factors such as the tumor burden, choice of co-stimulation, and degree of lymphodepletion, and can manifest as pulmonary edema, vascular leak, renal dysfunction, cardiac problems, hepatic failure, and coagulopathy. Many grading criteria have been used to define these clinical manifestations but they lack harmonization. Neurotoxicity has also been significantly associated with CAR T-cell therapy but it has not been studied much in previous literature. This review aims to provide a comprehensive account of the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, management, and treatment of CAR T-cell associated neurotoxicity.

Uncovering the Uncommon: An 81-Year-Old Woman With Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) but Normal Calcitonin Levels Diagnosed With Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare neuroendocrine tumor. However, non-elevated calcitonin levels have been reported in the literature. We present the case of an 81-year-old woman with chronic elevations in carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels for the past 15 years, despite normal calcitonin levels, who was ultimately diagnosed with MTC. The patient had a remote history of breast cancer and presented with symptoms of unintentional weight loss, fatigue, and joint pain. A positron emission tomography (PET) scan revealed low fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in partially calcified thyroid nodules, and fine needle aspiration cytology was consistent with medullary carcinoma. The patient underwent total thyroidectomy, with pathology revealing a pT1aN0M0 medullary thyroid microcarcinoma with negative margins. After thyroidectomy, CEA levels decreased to within the normal range, and calcitonin levels remained normal. This case highlights the importance of considering MTC in patients with unexplained chronic elevations in CEA levels, even with normal calcitonin levels.

Efficacy of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the primary treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Background and Aim: Molecular-targeted agents such as lenvatinib and sorafenib have been approved to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the choice between these two agents in the primary treatment for advanced HCC is still under debate with conflicting results. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of lenvatinib and sorafenib in patients with HCC. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for relevant articles from inception until February 10, 2023. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: A total of 13 studies with 3705 patients (1635 on lenvatinib and 2070 on sorafenib) were included in our analysis. The mean age of the patients in both groups was comparable (66.81 vs 65.9 years). Pooled analysis of primary outcomes showed that, compared with sorafenib, lenvatinib was associated with significantly better OS in patients treated with these drugs (HR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.97, P = 0.02). Pooled analysis also showed that PFS (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57-0.78, P < 0.00001) and time to progression (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31-0.79; P = 0.004) were significantly better in the lenvatinib group compared to the sorafenib group. It also showed that the lenvatinib group had significantly better ORR (odds ratio [OR] 5.43, 95% CI: 3.71-7.97; P < 0.00001) and DCR (OR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.75-3.16; P < 00001) than the sorafenib group. Conclusion: Our study shows that lenvatinib is superior to sorafenib regarding OS and PFS in patients with advanced HCC.