Return to Dance and Predictors of Outcome After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To investigate the rate of return to dance and factors influencing this primary outcome after hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. METHODS: A consecutive series of self-identified dancers with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome was included. To assess for the impact of hypermobility on outcomes, patients were classified as having either generalized joint laxity (GJL) or no GJL based on the Beighton-Horan Joint Mobility Index. A return-to-dance survey, the modified Harris Hip Score, and the Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living and HOS-Sports-Specific subscales were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. The preoperative-to-postoperative outcome score change was compared using the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state. Return to dance was evaluated regarding (1) return to any dance activity, (2) return to prior level of dance, and (3) number of hours of dance participation after surgery. Clinical and demographic predictors and return to dance were analyzed using univariate or bivariate analysis where appropriate. RESULTS: The study included 64 consecutive dancers (62 female and 2 male patients) (mean age, 22.3 ± 9.4 years; body mass index, 22.8 ± 4.1) with a mean follow-up period of 23.0 months. Postoperatively, 62 patients (97%) returned to dance at an average of 6.9 ± 2.9 months; 40 patients (62.5%) reported that they returned to a better level of participation, whereas 20 dancers (31%) returned to the same level of participation. Statistically significant increases were observed for the HOS-Activities of Daily Living subscale (60.5 ± 19.5 vs 92.4 ± 11.8, P < .001), HOS-Sports-Specific subscale (40.3 ± 20.3 vs 83.5 ± 19.4, P < .001), and modified Harris Hip Score (57.0 ± 13.6 vs 86.6 ± 13.9, P < .001). There was, however, a significant decrease in the number of hours of dance postoperatively: 11.5 ± 8.2 h/wk preoperatively versus 9.0 ± 7.3 h/wk postoperatively (P = .041). All postoperative hip outcome measures showed statistically significant (P < .001) and clinically relevant improvements. Patient-reported outcomes and return time showed no significant differences between the patient groups with GJL and without GJL (P = .1 and P = .489, respectively). For competitive dancers, a correlation was shown with a shorter time to return to dance (r2 = 0.45, P = .001), but there were no significant differences by skill level in patient-reported outcomes or dance hours. CONCLUSIONS: After hip arthroscopy, 97% of dancers returned to dance at an average of 6.9 months, with most dancers dancing at a level higher than their preoperative status. Dance experience level was the only significant factor influencing return-to-dance outcomes, with competitive dancers showing a faster return to dancing.conclusion LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Assessment of Association Between Spino-Pelvic Parameters and Outcomes Following Gluteus Medius Repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate postoperative coronal/sagittal spinal plane and spinopelvic parameters in patients undergoing gluteus medius repair and to identify associations between outcomes and the aforementioned spinopelvic variables. METHODS: Patients who underwent gluteus medius/minimus repair by a single surgeon between January 20, 2012, and November 25, 2015, were retrospectively identified from a prospectively collected database. Radiographic measurements included Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were obtained at baseline and a minimum of 22 months after surgery. Bivariate correlation determined effects of spinopelvic measurements on PROs. Scoliosis and nonscoliosis groups were compared using independent samples t-test, and multivariate analysis determined whether the preoperative variables affected outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-eight (80.9%) of 47 consecutive patients were radiographically evaluated with a scoliosis series. All patients demonstrated significant improvements in all PROs and pain (P < .001 for all), as well as at an average 28.2 ± 7.8 (range, 22-51) months after surgery. There were significant negative relationships between SVA and Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (r = -0.405, P = .026) and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific (r = -0.492, P = .011) scores. Patients with a positive SVA (>0 cm) had significantly worse patient-reported outcomes than their counterparts with negative (≤0 cm) SVA. Also, patients with positive sagittal plane deformity (SVA >5 cm) had significantly worse HOS-SS than patients without positive sagittal plane deformity (SVA <5 cm) (47.0 ± 35.3, 73.2 ± 24.0; P = .04). Independent sample t-testing for the patients with scoliosis (n = 18) versus no scoliosis (n = 20) demonstrates a significantly worse postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool (short version) score in the patients with scoliosis (77.4 ± 15.1, 53.8 ± 37.1; P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with scoliosis presented with lower rates of symptom improvement and ability to return to an active lifestyle in patients with hip disorders. In addition, patients with positive sagittal plane deformity experienced lower hip-related sport-specific outcome scores. Although the direct relationship between the spine and the hip in patients after gluteus medius/minimus repair remains unclear, this study shows an association between these postoperative outcomes and spinopelvic parameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

A Critical Review: Management and Surgical Options for Articular Defects in the Hip.

Patients with articular cartilage lesions of the hip may present with pain and symptoms that may be vague in nature and onset. Therefore, a thorough history and physical examination should be performed for every patient presenting with hip pain and/or disability. The management may be operative or nonoperative. Nonoperative management includes a trial of rest and/or activity modification, along with anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy, and biologic injections. Operative treatment in the form of arthroscopic techniques continues to decrease morbidity and offer innovative solutions and new applications for microfracture, ACT, and AMIC.