ABSTRACT
Introduction Re-explorations after open-heart surgery are often required if the patient is bleeding or shows features of cardiovascular instability and does not improve with conservative measures. Our study aims to determine whether timely re-exploration of patients who are bleeding has an impact on the morbidity and mortality of the patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of 75 patients that underwent open-heart surgery and subsequently underwent chest re-exploration for excessive bleeding between March 2018 and March 2020. Patients who were reopened post-op for indications other than excessive bleeding were excluded. Results A total number of cases were 700, out of which 75 (9.3%) patients were reopened, as compared to the literature, which shows worldwide 2-11% being reopened. Post-operative drain output was 1000ml to 1500ml in 47 (62.7%) and more than 1500ml in 28 (37.3%) patients before they were reopened. In 67 (89.3%) patients, three to five units of blood were transfused, and in eight (10.7%) patients, more than five units of blood were transfused. We believe our mortality in the reopened patients was low, because of timely intervention and early re-exploration, and is probably the reason why our figures land in a higher range (2-11%) of reopened cases (9.3%). Reopening time was less than five hours in 49 (65.3%) patients and less than 10 hours in 26 (34.7%) patients in our study. We tried to minimize the loss of blood and re-explored the patients before they lose excessive blood, the average time for reopening in our study was less than 10 hours. The average intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 4.2 days (range three to six days). Wound infections were reported in one of three patients. There was no mortality in these patients. Surgical site of bleeding was identified in 54 (72%) patients and no particular site was found in 21 (28%) patients. Suggesting that it is common to have a surgical bleeder than coagulopathy induced bleeding in post-cardiac surgery patients Conclusions We believe our low mortality (0%) is due to early reopening in patients who are bleeding excessively after cardiac surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective To determine the incidence of endotracheal reintubation, excluding surgical reopening, in post-cardiac surgical patients in a tertiary care hospital. Material and methods A retrospective descriptive analysis of 408 patients who underwent different cardiac surgeries during this period. Post-operative extubation was performed when patients fulfilled the preset criteria for extubation, which include consciousness (awake and aware), stable vital signs, acceptable arterial blood gases, acceptable respiratory mechanics, a maximum inspiratory force greater than 20-25 cm H2O, chest tube drainage less than 100 ml per hour, normal temperature and electrolytes. The total number of patients who were reintubated within 72 hours of extubation was noted. The criteria for reintubation included altered conscious level with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of less than 8, respiratory failure, unstable hemodynamics, and arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation. All of the information was collected retrospectively on a specifically prepared form. Data was entered and evaluated in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. The research was piloted in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) of Northwest General Hospital and Research Center, Hayatabad, Peshawar from December 2018 to March 2020. Results Out of 408 patients who had cardiac surgeries, only nine (2.2%) were reintubated after initial extubation. The average time for which patients remained on the ventilator was 8 ± 2 hours. The reasons for reintubation were recorded. Among those reintubated, eight patients (88.88%) had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) whereas one patient (11.11%) had undergone mitral valve replacement (MVR). In three (33.33%) patients, stroke (hemiplegia in two and global brain ischemia in one) with low GCS was the primary cause of reintubation. Arrhythmias - which included VT, ventricular fibrillation (VF), and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) - were responsible for three (33.33%) cases of reintubation. Respiratory failure - with a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood less than 60 mmHg, along with tachypnea - was responsible for reintubation in two (22.22%) patients. In one (11.11%) patient who had MVR, cardiac arrest was the underlying reason; the cause of arrest could not be retrieved from the retrospective data. Notably, as a common variable, five (62.5%) out of the eight reintubated CABG patients had a poor left ventricular function. Conclusion Causes of reintubation were primarily cardiac (arrhythmias) and neurological, followed by respiratory causes in our center. Patients with poor left ventricular function and diffuse coronary artery disease appear to have a higher incidence of reintubation which can lead to extended CICU and hospital stay, elevated mortality, and higher costs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sympathetic response associated with laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation is recognized as a potential cause for a number of complications especially in coronary bypass surgery patients. Various methods have been used to attenuate these hemodynamic responses, The aim of our study was to compare lidocaine spray in addition to intravenous morphine on attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with intravenous lidocaine and morphine in coronary artery bypass surgery patients. METHOD: Sixty patients, scheduled for elective coronary bypass grafting surgery were included in this randomized controlled trial. The patients randomly divided in group-A (Intravenous Morphine 0.1mg/kg and Intravenous lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg) and group-B (Intravenous Morphine 0.1mg/kg and lidocaine spray 1.5 mg/kg). RESULTS: Demographic data was comparable in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups in the duration of laryngoscopy and intubation. There was statistically insignificant attenuation in heart rate in both groups (p=0.134), the trends of attenuation of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure in group-A compared to group-B (p=0.933), (p=0.768) and (p=0.136) respectively were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Under the present study design, lidocaine spray in addition to intravenous morphine had no better effect on attenuating the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation as compared to intravenous lidocaine and morphine in coronary artery bypass surgery patients.
