Superiority of manual disinfection using pre-soaked wipes over automatic UV-C radiation without prior cleaning.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of ultraviolet C (UV-C) radiation against a broad spectrum of micro-organisms has been demonstrated in several studies, but differences in the specific doses and the extent of microbial reduction were found. Furthermore, the conditions of laboratory tests differ greatly from reality, such that efficacy achieved in tests may not necessarily be assumed in reality. Consequently, it is important to investigate the effectiveness of UV-C in representative field trials. The aim was therefore to develop and establish a field test to evaluate automatic UV-C in comparison to manual disinfection. METHODS: Before and after disinfection, samples were repeatedly collected from naturally highly contaminated surfaces using the swab technique to obtain representative data sets for disinfected and non-disinfected surfaces. Subsequently, the log reduction values (LRV) and the disinfection success were evaluated for UV-C radiation and full compliant manual disinfection using alcohol-based wipes. RESULTS: Surfaces that are naturally contaminated with bacteria on a regular and nearly uniform basis have been identified as particularly suitable for field testing. Mean contamination was reduced from 23.3 to 1.98 cfu/cm2 (LRV 0.9) and 29.7 to 0.26 cfu/cm2 (LRV 1.2) for UV-C and manual disinfection, respectively. UV-C disinfection achieved 75.5% successful disinfected surfaces, whereas manual disinfection showed 98.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Full compliant manual disinfection showed slightly higher LRVs and disinfection success than automatic UV-C disinfection. Successful, operator-independent UV-C disinfection still has the potential to improve disinfection performance in addition to manual disinfection.

Evaluation of temperature, drying time and other determinants for the recovery of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens in disinfectant efficacy testing.

BACKGROUND: In the clinical setting, surface disinfection is an important measure to reduce the risk of cross transmission of micro-organisms and the risk of nosocomial infections. Standardized methods can be used to evaluate disinfection procedures, as well as the effectiveness of the active ingredients used for disinfection. However, despite standardization, the results of such methodologies are still determined by several factors, and incorrect results may lead to invalid assumptions about the effectiveness of a disinfectant, posing significant health risks for patients and health personnel. AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate several determinants for the recovery of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other test organisms to establish their influence on the results of standardized disinfection methodologies, and to find Gram-negative strains that can be used as suitable replacements for P. aeruginosa. METHODS: The effects of inoculum application method, drying time, temperature and carrier material on the survival and recovery of the test organisms were evaluated using Student's t-test, one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison test. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Temperature, drying time, application method and carrier material were found to affect the recovery of P. aeruginosa cells significantly, and therefore influence the outcome of the methodologies used. This study also showed thatP. aeruginosa could be replaced with the Gram-negative species Acinetobacter baumannii, a test organism used in many standardized methodologies, which responds better under the same circumstances and has a behaviour similar to that of P. aeruginosa in disinfectant efficacy tests.