DXA-derived lumbar bone strain index corrected for kyphosis is associated with vertebral fractures and trabecular bone score in acromegaly.

PURPOSE: The bone strain index (BSI) is a marker of bone deformation based on a finite element analysis inferred from dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans, that has been proposed as a predictor of fractures in osteoporosis (i.e., higher BSI indicates a lower bone's resistance to loads with consequent higher risk of fractures). We aimed to investigate the association between lumbar BSI and vertebral fractures (VFs) in acromegaly. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with acromegaly (13 males, mean age 58 years; three with active disease) were evaluated for morphometric VFs, trabecular bone score (TBS), bone mineral density (BMD) and BSI at lumbar spine, the latter being corrected for the kyphosis as measured by low-dose X-ray imaging system (EOS®-2D/3D). RESULTS: Lumbar BSI was significantly higher in patients with VFs as compared to those without fractures (2.90 ± 1.46 vs. 1.78 ± 0.33, p = 0.041). BSI was inversely associated with TBS (rho -0.44; p = 0.034), without significant associations with BMD (p = 0.151), age (p = 0.500), BMI (p = 0.957), serum IGF-I (p = 0.889), duration of active disease (p = 0.434) and sex (p = 0.563). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar BSI corrected for kyphosis could be proposed as integrated parameter of spine arthropathy and osteopathy in acromegaly helping the clinicians in identifying patients with skeletal fragility possibly predisposed to VFs.

DXA-Based Bone Strain Index: A New Tool to Evaluate Bone Quality in Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

CONTEXT: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is associated with impaired bone quality and increased fracture risk. Reliable tools for the evaluation of bone quality parameters are not yet clinically available. Bone Strain Index (BSI) is a new metric for bone strength based on Finite Element Analysis from lumbar spine and femoral neck dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images. OBJECTIVE: To assess the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) BSI in PHPT patients compared with controls and to investigate the association of BSI with vertebral fractures (VFs) in PHPT. METHODS: This case-control study enrolled 50 PHPT patients and 100 age- and sex-matched control subjects from an outpatient clinic. The main outcome measures were LS-BSI, FN-BSI, and TH-BSI. RESULTS: FN bone mineral density (BMD) and one-third distal radius BMD were lower in the PHPT group than in controls (FN 0.633 ± 0.112 vs 0.666 ± 0.081, P = 0.042; radius 0.566 ± 0.07 vs 0.625 ± 0.06, P < 0.001). PHPT group has significant lower TBS score compared with controls (1.24 ± 0.09 vs 1.30 ± 0.10, P < 0.001). BSI was significantly higher at LS (2.28 ± 0.59 vs 2.02 ± 0.43, P = 0.009), FN (1.72 ± 0.41 vs 1.49 ± 0.35, P = 0.001), and TH (1.51 ± 0.33 vs 1.36 ± 0.25, P = 0.002) in PHPT. LS-BSI showed moderate accuracy for discriminating VFs (AUC 0.667; 95% CI, 0.513-0.820). LS-BSI ≥ 2.2 and was a statistically significant independent predictor of VFs, with an adjusted odds ratio ranging from 5.7 to 15.1. CONCLUSION: BSI, a DXA-derived bone quality index, is impaired in PHPT and may help to identify PHPT subjects at high risk of fractures.

Prevalence and determinants of radiological vertebral fractures in patients with Klinefelter syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Klinefelter syndrome (KS) may induce skeletal fragility, but the studies so far published on this topic were mainly focused on the evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microstructure, whereas data on fracture risk are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and determinants of vertebral fractures (VFs), that is, the hallmark of osteoporosis, in subjects with KS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with KS (median age 41 years, range 18-64) were consecutively evaluated for radiological VFs (by quantitative morphometry) and lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD (by DXA). Fifty-five patients with KS were also evaluated by the fracture risk assessment (FRAX) tool. RESULTS: Low BMD was found in 22/87 (25.3%) patients [12 with osteopenia, three with osteoporosis and seven with "low BMD per age" (subject < 50 years with Z-score ≤-2.0 SD)] and VFs in 13/87 (14.9%) patients. In patients with VFs, the median spine deformity index was 2 (range 1-9). Prevalence of VFs was similar between healthy and low-BMD patients (15.9% vs 13.6%; P = .80). Noteworthy, patients with VFs had significantly higher age at diagnosis of KS as compared to patients who did not fracture (P = .039), without significant differences in age at the time of observation (P = .162), body mass index (P = .234), testosterone replacement therapy (P = .432), duration of testosterone therapy (P = .409), vitamin D therapy (P = 681), and serum testosterone levels (P = .338). Moreover, patients with VFs were more likely to complain back pain in comparison with those without VFs (33.3% vs 7.4%; P = .047). In 55 cases evaluated by the FRAX® tool, no significant differences in 10-year risk of major fracture (P = .270) and hip fracture (P = .860) were found between fractured and non-fractured patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides first evidence that KS may be associated with risk of VFs in close relationship with delay in disease diagnosis but independently of BMD values and serum testosterone levels or testosterone therapy.

Determinants of bone damage: An ex-vivo study on porcine vertebrae.

Bone's resistance to fracture depends on several factors, such as bone mass, microarchitecture, and tissue material properties. The clinical assessment of bone strength is generally performed by Dual-X Ray Photon Absorptiometry (DXA), measuring bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS). Although it is considered the major predictor of bone strength, BMD only accounts for about 70% of fragility fractures, while the remaining 30% could be described by bone "quality" impairment parameters, mainly related to tissue microarchitecture. The assessment of bone microarchitecture generally requires more invasive techniques, which are not applicable in routine clinical practice, or X-Ray based imaging techniques, requiring a longer post-processing. Another important aspect is the presence of local damage in the bony tissue that may also affect the prediction of bone strength and fracture risk. To provide a more comprehensive analysis of bone quality and quantity, and to assess the effect of damage, here we adopt a framework that includes clinical, morphological, and mechanical analyses, carried out by means of DXA, µCT and mechanical compressive testing, respectively. This study has been carried out on trabecular bones, taken from porcine trabecular vertebrae, for the similarity with human lumbar spine. This study confirms that no single method can provide a complete characterization of bone tissue, and the combination of complementary characterization techniques is required for an accurate and exhaustive description of bone status. BMD and TBS have shown to be complementary parameters to assess bone strength, the former assessing the bone quantity and resistance to damage, and the latter the bone quality and the presence of damage accumulation without being able to predict the risk of fracture.

The role of carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen, dual x-ray absorptiometry bone strain and Romberg test in a new osteoporotic fracture risk evaluation: A proposal from an observational study.

The consolidated way of diagnosing and treating osteoporosis in order to prevent fragility fractures has recently been questioned by some papers, which complained of overdiagnosis and consequent overtreatment of this pathology with underestimating other causes of the fragility fractures, like falls. A new clinical approach is proposed for identifying the subgroup of patients prone to fragility fractures. This retrospective observational study was conducted from January to June 2015 at the Nuclear Medicine-Bone Metabolic Unit of the of the Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy. An Italian population of 125 consecutive postmenopausal women was investigated for bone quantity and bone quality. Patients with neurological diseases regarding balance and vestibular dysfunction, sarcopenia, past or current history of diseases and use of drugs known to affect bone metabolism were excluded. Dual X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess bone quantity (bone mineral density) and bone quality (trabecular bone score and bone strain). Biochemical markers of bone turnover (type I collagen carboxy-terminal telopeptide, alkaline phosphatase, vitamin D) have been measured. Morphometric fractures have been searched by spine radiography. Balance was evaluated by the Romberg test. The data were evaluated with the neural network analysis using the Auto Contractive Map algorithm. The resulting semantic map shows the Minimal Spanning Tree and the Maximally Regular Graph of the interrelations between bone status parameters, balance conditions and fractures of the studied population. A low fracture risk seems to be related to a low carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen level, whereas a positive Romberg test, together with compromised bone trabecular microarchitecture DXA parameters, appears to be strictly connected with fragility fractures. A simple assessment of the risk of fragility fracture is proposed in order to identify those frail patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures, who may have the best benefit from a pharmacological and physiotherapeutic approach.

Assessment of Bone Quality in Osteoporosis Treatment with Bone Anabolic Agents: Really Something New?

Osteoporosis is a chronic pathologic condition, particularly of the elderly, in which a reduction of bone mineral density (BMD) weakens bone, leading to the so-called fragility fractures, most often of spine and femur. The gold standard exam for the quantitative measurement of BMD is the dual X-ray photon absorptiometry (DXA), a radiological method. However, a relevant number of fragility fractures occurs in the range of normal BMD values, meaning that also qualitative aspects of bone play a role, namely bone architecture and bone geometry. Bone structure is investigated by microCT and histomorphometry, which necessitate an invasive approach with a biopsy, usually taken at the iliac crest, not the typical site of fragility fractures. New tools, trabecular bone score (TBS) and hip structural analysis (HSA), obtained during DXA, can supply informations about bone structure of spine and femur, respectively, in a not invasive way. Therapy of osteoporosis is based on two types of drugs leading to an increase of BMD: antiresorptive and anabolic treatments. The antiresorptive drugs inhibit the osteoclasts, whereas teriparatide and, in part, strontium ranelate ameliorate bone structure. The present review deals with the relation between the anabolic drugs for osteoporosis and the cited new tools which investigate bone architecture and geometry, in order to clarify if they represent a real advantage in monitoring efficacy of osteoporosis' treatment. Data from the studies show that increases of TBS and HSA values after anabolic therapy are small and very close to their least significant change at the end of the usual period of treatment. Therefore, it is questionable if TBS and HSA are really helpful in monitoring bone quality and in defining reduction of individual fragility fracture risk during osteoporosis treatment with bone anabolic agents.

Reproducibility of trabecular bone score with different scan modes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a phantom study.

OBJECTIVE: The trabecular bone score (TBS) accounts for the bone microarchitecture and is calculated on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We estimated the reproducibility of the TBS using different scan modes compared to the reproducibility bone mineral density (BMD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A spine phantom was used with a Hologic QDR-Discovery A densitometer. For each scan mode [fast array, array, high definition (HD)], 25 scans were automatically performed without phantom repositioning; a further 25 scans were performed with phantom repositioning. For each scan, the TBS was obtained. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated as the ratio between standard deviation and mean; percent least significant change (LSC%) as 2.8 × CoV; reproducibility as the complement to 100 % of LSC%. Differences among scan modes were assessed using ANOVA. RESULTS: Without phantom repositioning, the mean TBS (mm(-1)) was: 1.352 (fast array), 1.321 (array), and 1.360 (HD); with phantom repositioning, it was 1.345, 1.332, and 1.362, respectively. Reproducibility of the TBS without phantom repositioning was 97.7 % (fast array), 98.3 % (array), and 98.2 % (HD); with phantom repositioning, it was 97.9 %, 98.7 %, and 98.4 %, respectively. LSC% was ≤ 2.26 %. Differences among scan modes were all statistically significant (p ≤ 0.019). Reproducibility of BMD was 99.1 % with all scan modes, while LSC% was from 0.86 % to 0.91 %. CONCLUSION: Reproducibility error of the TBS was 2-3-fold higher than that of BMD. Although statistically significant, differences in TBS among scan modes were within the highest LSC%. Thus, the three scan modes can be considered interchangeable.

Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis.

Altered bone micro-architecture is an important factor in accounting for fragility fractures. Until recently, it has not been possible to gain information about skeletal microstructure in a way that is clinically feasible. Bone biopsy is essentially a research tool. High-resolution peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography, while non-invasive, is available only sparsely throughout the world. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is an imaging technology adapted directly from the Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) image of the lumbar spine. Thus, it is potentially readily and widely available. In recent years, a large number of studies have demonstrated that TBS is significantly associated with direct measurements of bone micro-architecture, predicts current and future fragility fractures in primary osteoporosis, and may be a useful adjunct to BMD for fracture detection and prediction. In this review, we summarize its potential utility in secondary causes of osteoporosis. In some situations, like glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and in diabetes mellitus, the TBS appears to out-perform DXA. It also has apparent value in numerous other disorders associated with diminished bone health, including primary hyperparathyroidism, androgen-deficiency, hormone-receptor positive breast cancer treatment, chronic kidney disease, hemochromatosis, and autoimmune disorders like rheumatoid arthritis. Further research is both needed and warranted to more clearly establish the role of TBS in these and other disorders that adversely affect bone.

In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to estimate the in vivo reproducibility of bone mineral density (BMD) at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and to compare fast array, array, and high-definition scan modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 378 patients (38 males and 340 females; mean age 63 ± 9 years) underwent DXA using a QDR-Discovery A densitometer (Hologic). Considering the three scan modes on lumbar spine and right femur, six independent groups of 30 patients were examined twice (for a total of 180 patients). Least significant change (LSC) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. The remaining 198 patients underwent three scans of the lumbar spine (n = 92) or of the right femur (n = 106), one for each scan mode. The student t test and Bland-Altman analysis used were. Scan times were recorded and radiation dose was estimated using the ICRP60 method. RESULTS: Intra-scan mode reproducibility was 98-99%, corresponding to an LSC of 1.49-2.08%. The SDD was 0.018-0.023 g/cm(2) (lumbar spine) and 0.017-0.019 g/cm(2) (right femur). All comparisons among scan modes were statistically significant (p < 0.001) but lower than SDDs, i.e. not clinically relevant. Considering lumbar spine and the right femur, scan times were 50 and 38 s for fast array, 98 and 74 s for array, and 195 and 148 s for high definition, respectively; radiation doses were 6.7 and 4.7 µSv for fast array, and 13.3 and 9.3 µSv for both array and high definition, respectively. CONCLUSION: Since all BMD differences were lower than the SSDs, the three scan modes can be considered interchangeable. As a consequence, although the absolute reduction in time and radiation dose is relatively low, when BMD measurement is the aim of DXA, fast array can be generally preferred.

Insulin-like growth factor-1 is associated with bone formation markers, PTH and bone mineral density in healthy premenopausal women.

Bone turnover markers (BTM) progressively decrease in young adult women. This might be linked to changes in insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I). Four serum BTMs [serum C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), osteocalcin (OC), N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP), and bone alkaline phosphatase (bone AP)], serum calcium (sCa), phosphate (sPO(4)), magnesium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) and IGF-I were measured in 531 young healthy premenopausal women aged 20-50 years participating in the BONTURNO study. In all subjects bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the spine and at the hip by dual-energy X-ray densitometry. Hip BMD, IGF-I, the four BTMs, sCa and sPO(4) progressively decreased with advancing age and this was associated with proportional increases in PTH. IGF-I levels were significantly and positively correlated with sCa, sPO(4), CTX, OC, P1NP, bone AP, spine BMD, femoral neck BMD and total hip BMD and negatively with age, BMI and serum PTH. When the IGF-I levels were adjusted for age and BMI, the only correlations maintaining a statistical significance were those with serum PTH, P1NP and bone AP. These associations were weak and IGF-I accounted for a only a small proportion of the BTM variance. The mean, age-adjusted IGF-I values were significantly higher in women practicing physical exercises for more then 60 min per week than in sedentary women. In conclusion, in this study we provide evidence of an association between the age-related decline in IGF-I with the progressive decrease in bone formation markers in premenopausal women.

Increased serum OPG in atrophic nonunion shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: Bone repair alteration is hypothesized for nonunion fracture pathogenesis. Since it is involved in osteoclast regulation, the RANK/RANKL/OPG system (receptor activator of nuclear factor kB/its ligand/osteoprotegerin) may play a role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum OPG, free RANKL, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), osteocalcin (OC), and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) were determined in 16 male patients (20-39 years) with long bone atrophic nonunion fractures. Serum markers were also measured in 18 age-matched male controls who healed from the same type of fractures within six months, and in 14 age-matched male controls who were healing from the same fractures one month after injury. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Only OPG was significantly higher (0.56 sd 0.11 ng/ml) in the patients compared to healed (0.26 sd 0.04 ng/ml; P < 0.001) and healing (0.29 sd 0.09 ng/ml; P < 0.001) controls. The patients' DPD levels were normal. No correlations were found between bone markers and the characteristics of the subjects in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: A normal steady state of bone metabolism seems to be present in patients with atrophic nonunion fractures, despite the high serum OPG. The reason for the inability of the patients' OPG to inhibit osteoclastic activity is unknown. Osteoblast activity also appears normal, so another cellular source of OPG can be hypothesized.

Effect of kidney transplantation on bone mass and body composition in males.

BACKGROUND: Bone loss is a frequent and well-known complication in the first months after renal transplantation, but there are no data considering body composition variables (bone, fat, and lean mass) together in transplant recipients. This prospective study investigated total body bone density, fat mass, and lean mass before and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after renal transplantation in male patients who underwent hemodialysis. METHODS: Twenty consecutive renal transplant male patients aged 23-64 years (mean, 40 years; median, 41 years) received one of two immunosuppressive therapies (cyclosporine+methylprednisolone, or cyclosporine+methylprednisolone+azathioprine). The bone, fat, and lean mass of the total body and its related subregions were assessed by means of dual X-ray photon absorptiometry. Mixed factorial analysis of variance for repeated measurements was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: During the 6 months after transplantation, there was a reduction in trabecular bone mass in the spine, ribs, and pelvis total body subregions; the reduction was statistically significant in the last two subregions. There was no statistically significant difference in the lean mass of the total body or its subregions over time, but there was a statistically significant increase in the fat mass of the total body and all of its subregions; the increase in total and trunk fat mass seemed to be greater in the patients not receiving azathioprine. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 6 months after renal transplantation in male patients who underwent hemodialysis, there is a marked increase in fat mass, a significant loss of trabecular bone mass, and no change in cortical bone and lean mass.