Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 13(7): 391-7, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27159352

ABSTRACT

In the past, Listeria monocytogenes has been isolated from game feces and meat. However, less information is available on the occurrence of L. monocytogenes in other specimens originating from game animals. Hence, the aim of this study was to get an overview of the occurrence and distribution of L. monocytogenes in game animals by characterization of isolates from different matrices. For that purpose, samples were collected from red deer (Cervus elaphus), wild boars (Sus scrofa), and feed during the hunting season 2011-2012 in three different regions of Germany and Austria. Six samples from each animal were examined: tonsils, content of the rumen or the stomach, liver, intestinal lymph nodes, cecum content, and feces. Nineteen of 45 red deer and 12 of 49 wild boars were found to be positive for L. monocytogenes as well as 4 of 22 pooled feed samples. L. monocytogenes was isolated most frequently from the rumen of red deer (14 of 19) and the tonsils of wild boars (7 of 12). Serotypes 1/2a, 1/2b, 4a, and 4b were detected in samples of game animals and feed, and serotypes 1/2a and 4b were the most prevalent serotypes. The presence of L. monocytogenes serotype 4a had not yet been described in red deer. This might be due to the fact that it was only isolated from the content of rumen and that no other study has yet examined ruminal content. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed a wide variety of strains. Some strains occurred in both species and feed samples, but one strain was dominant in one region. The results show that red deer and wild boars can be carriers of L. monocytogenes in different matrices, although the feces samples can be negative.


Subject(s)
Deer/microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes/isolation & purification , Listeriosis/veterinary , Sus scrofa/microbiology , Animals , Austria , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Feces/microbiology , Germany , Listeria monocytogenes/classification , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Palatine Tonsil/microbiology , Rumen/microbiology , Serotyping
2.
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr ; 127(3-4): 129-34, 2014.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24693658

ABSTRACT

The use of antimicrobial agents is responsible for the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Nevertheless, multiresistant bacteria have been found in animals that have never been exposed to antimicrobial agents. Wild animals that are carriers of methicillin-resistant organisms represent a hazard since they can transmit their bacteria to other animals and to humans. In the hunting season 2009/2010 nasal swabs of 98 red deer and 109 wild boars were examined for the presence of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant staphylococci. From each wild boar methicillin-susceptible staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus in 28% and Staphylococcus spp. in 72% of the animals) were isolated. In red deer the detection rate of Staphylococcus (S.) aureus and methicillin-susceptible staphylococci was 49% and 17%, respectively. The occurrence of S. aureus was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in red deer than in wild boars. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci were not found. However, in one third of the red deer, methicillin-resistant bacteria of the genus Enterococcus spp. and Bacillus spp. were isolated. The results of the present study indicate that wildlife, especially red deer are an important reservoir for S. aureus and that the upper respiratory tract of red deer is regularly colonised with methicillin-resistant bacteria such as Bacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. Primarily, commensal bacteria are harmless to human health, however, red deer may be a reservoir for antibiotic-resistant bacteria.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Disease Reservoirs/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacillus/drug effects , Carrier State/microbiology , Carrier State/veterinary , Deer/microbiology , Enterococcus/drug effects , Germany , Methicillin/pharmacology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Sus scrofa/microbiology
3.
J Food Prot ; 73(10): 1780-4, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21067664

ABSTRACT

After campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis is the second main cause of human bacterial enteritis in Germany. Salmonella is known to colonize the gastrointestinal tract of animals without producing any clinical signs. Therefore, carcasses can become contaminated with Salmonella at the time of slaughter. During an 11-month period, a total of 4,170 raw meat samples and by-products from beef and pork, obtained from seven different slaughterhouses in Southern Germany, were screened by the VIDAS system for Salmonella in this study. Positive results were confirmed by isolation of the pathogen on selective agars. The overall percentage of Salmonella-positive samples was 1.4% by the VIDAS system and 0.7% by culture confirmation. Salmonella was detected in 1.8% of pork samples by the VIDAS system and in 1.1% of samples by culture. In beef samples the presence of Salmonella was verified in 0.6% of samples by the VIDAS system and in 0.1% by culture on selective agars. The highest contamination rates were found in porcine and bovine tongue samples. Salmonella was detected in porcine samples throughout the year, except in samples collected in July, and a slight increase was observed in the colder months. The VIDAS system was shown to be an efficient screening method for the detection of Salmonella, with the advantage of a reduced analysis time.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Food Contamination/analysis , Meat/microbiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Animals , Cattle , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Food Microbiology , Germany , Humans , Meat Products/microbiology , Salmonella Food Poisoning/prevention & control , Seasons , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...