ABSTRACT
To develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), we examined the data of 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in the United States (the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients who received transplantation in Europe (the European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] cohort; n = 623). Patient age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.96), and HLA-matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with an increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin levels <100 g/L at time of transplantation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2-2.19) and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.52) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points), and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61-76), 51% (95% CI, 46-56.4), and 34% (95% CI, 21-49), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; P = .0017) but not of relapse (P = .12). The derived score was predictive of OS (P < .001) and TRM (P = .002) but not of relapse (P = .17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in 2 large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF about the transplantation outcomes.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Primary Myelofibrosis , Humans , United States , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Primary Myelofibrosis/diagnosis , Primary Myelofibrosis/therapy , Transplantation, Homologous , Unrelated Donors , Chronic Disease , RecurrenceABSTRACT
BackgroundMorbidity and mortality of COVID-19 is increased in patients with B-cell depleting therapies, the majority of which also show compromised vaccination-induced immune responses. Herein, we report on the trajectories of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients from the original RituxiVac study compared to healthy volunteers and investigate the immunogenicity of a third vaccination in previously non-responding patients. MethodsA follow-up evaluation was performed in volunteers and patients from the RituxiVac Study (NCT04877496), which investigated the humoral and cell-mediated immune response after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with a history with anti-CD20 depleting therapies (rituximab or ocrelizumab). The current population included 33 patients and 26 healthy volunteers with initial humoral vaccine response and 32 non-responding patients. Primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody trajectories in vaccine responders 4.3 months (median; interquartile range [IQR]: 3.6 - 4.8 months) after first evaluation and humoral responses after a third vaccine dose in previous non-responders. Antibody decay rates were compared using analysis of covariance in linear regression. ResultsIn patients with detectable anti-spike IgG antibodies after two-dose vaccination, circulating anti-spike IgG persisted in 88% (29/33) of patients 5.6 months after the second vaccination (median; IQR: 5.1-6.7) compared to 92% (24/26) of healthy volunteers 6.8 months after the second dose (IQR: 6.0-7.1) (p=0.7). Antibody decay rates were comparable between patients and controls with -0.54 signal/cut-off (s/c) units per month (IQR -0.72 to -0.45) and -0.60 s/c units per month (IQR: -0.88 to -0.44), p=0.70. Two-dose responders with loss of circulating antibodies at follow-up (n=4/33, 12%) had lower initial antibody concentrations (p<0.01). Biomarkers for immunocompetence, including CD3, CD4 or CD19 cell count at baseline did not predict anti-spike IgG persistence. In two-dose non-responders, a third dose of mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 elicited humoral response with detectable anti-spike IgG antibodies in 19% (6/32) participants. No clinical parameters nor biomarkers of immunocompetence predicted humoral response after a third vaccine dose. ConclusionThe present study reveals comparable antibody reduction rates between patients with CD20-depleting treatment history and healthy volunteers, but inefficient humoral responses to a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in the majority of two-dose non-responders. There is a need for individually tailored vaccination strategies in immunocompromised patients that could be stratified by B cell counts and initial level of antibody titers. (Funded by Bern University Hospital, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04877496)
ABSTRACT
BackgroundB-cell depleting therapies increase COVID19 morbidity and mortality. For this specific population, evidence-based vaccination strategies are lacking. Here, we investigated humoral and cell mediated immune responses to SARS-CoV2 mRNA-based vaccines in patients receiving CD20-B-cell depleting agents for autoimmune disease, malignancy, or transplantation. MethodsPatients at the Bern University Hospital with a treatment history of anti-CD20 depleting agents (rituximab or ocrelizumab) were enrolled for analysis of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses (by interferon-{gamma} release assay) after completing vaccination against SARS-CoV2. Primary outcome was the the anti-spike antibody response in anti-CD20-treated patients (n=96) in comparison to immunocompetent controls (n=29). ResultsAnti-spike IgG antibodies were detected in 49% of patients 1.79 months after the second vaccine dose (interquartile range, IQR: 1.16-2.48) compared to 100% of controls (p<0.001). SARS-CoV2 specific interferon-{gamma} release was detected in 20% of patients and 75% of healthy controls (p<0.001). Only 11% of patients, but 75%of healthy controls showed positive reactions in both assays, respectively (p<0.001). Time since last anti-CD20 therapy (7.6 months), peripheral CD19+ (>27/{micro}l), and CD4+ lymphocyte count (>653/{micro}l) predicted humoral vaccine response (area under the curve [AUC]: 67% [CI 56-78], 67% [CI 55-80] and 66% [CI 54-79], (positive predictive value [PPV]: 0.78, 0.7 and 0.71). ConclusionThis study provides evidence for blunted humoral and cell-mediated immune responses elicited by SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccines in patients with CD20-depleting treatment history. Lymphocyte subpopulation counts are associated with vaccine response in this highly vulnerable population. (Funded by Bern University Hospital, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04877496)
