Systematic triage and treatment of earthquake victims: Our experience in a tertiary hospital after the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of our triage system in acceleration of intervention for the musculoskeletal injuries and clinical follow-ups of trauma patients admitted to our center after the Kahramanmaras earthquake. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 6th, 2023 and February 20th, 2023, a total of 439 patients (207 males, 232 females; mean age: 37.1±19.1 years; range, 1 to 94 years) with earthquake-related musculoskeletal injuries after the Kahramanmaras earthquake were retrospectively analyzed. Data including age, sex, referral city information, removal time from the rubbles, physical examination findings, clinical photos, fasciotomy and amputation stumps and levels, and X-ray images and computed tomography images of all patients were shared and archived in the WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc.® ATTN/CA, USA) group called 'Earthquake' created by orthopedic surgeons. To complete the patient interventions as soon as possible and to ensure order, the patients were distributed with the teams in order through this group by the consultant orthopedic surgeon. The treatments were applied and recorded according to the skin and soft tissue conditions, and fractures of the patients. All treatments were carried out with a multi-disciplinary approach. RESULTS: Of the patients, 16.2% were children. Lower limb injuries constituted 59.07% of musculoskeletal injuries. Upper limb, pelvic, and spinal cord injuries were observed in 21.9%, 12.7%, and 6.25%, respectively. Conservative treatment was applied to 183 (41.68%) patients. The most common surgical intervention was debridement (n=136, 53.1%). External fixation was applied in the first stage to 21 (8.2%) patients with open fractures. The mean removal time from the rubbles was 32.1±29.38 h. A total of 118 limb fasciotomy operations were applied to the patients. Fifty limb amputations were performed in 40 patients at the last follow-up due to vascular insufficiency and infection. CONCLUSION: Based on our study results, we believe that a triage system using a good communication and organization strategy is beneficial to prevent treatment delay and possible adverse events in future disasters.

Combination of hyperbaric oxygen and core decompression therapies improve outcomes in the treatment of hip osteonecrosis.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate whether combined treatment of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and core decompression (CD) result with better outcomes and have an additional influence on health quality scores when compared with HBO alone. METHODS: 63 consecutive patients' 80 hips (43 male, 20 female, 17 bilateral), diagnosed with Stage II Osteonecrosis of the femoral head were included in our study. The mean age at presentation in the HBO and CD + HBO groups were 39.9 years and 39.2 years, respectively. The mean follow-up was 39.8 months (24-56 months) for HBO group and 43.1 months (24-58 months) for the CD + HBO group. Standard radiographs and MRI were performed initially and during controls. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (HHS), the visual analogue score (VAS) and SF-36 life quality score. RESULTS: 52 hips (65%) were Ficat Stage IIa and 28 hips (35%) were IIb. Totally, 46 hips (30 hips IIa, 16 hips IIb) were in HBO alone group and 34 hips (22 hips IIa, 12 hips IIb) were in CD + HBO group. Both VAS and HHSs were improved in each group after treatment (p < 0.001). When both groups were compared, this improvement was more distinct and evident in CD + HBO combination group than HBO alone group (p < 0.001). The physical function and pain components of SF-36 survey were found to be different in between two groups (p < 0.005). DISCUSSION: HBO treatment decreases pain, increases functional scores for Ficat Stage II patients. Addition of HBO treatment to decompression of the femoral head improves the results better than HBO alone. In particular, reduction of pain is more prevalent for Stage IIa patients than IIb with combination of HBO and CD therapies.

A Novel Hook Wire Tension Technique for the Treatment of Mallet Fractures: A Comparison with the Extension Block Pinning Technique.

We developed a percutaneous surgical technique that allows early mobilization and compression for the treatment of mallet fractures. The aim of this study was to describe this novel technique called the hook wire tension technique (HWTT) and provide a clinical and radiological comparison between HWTT and the extension block pinning technique (EBT) in the treatment of mallet fractures. This retrospective study included 23 mallet fracture patients treated using HWTT and 25 patients treated using EBT. At the final follow-up visit, extension lag and flexion of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) were measured. DIPJ pain was assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the overall clinical outcomes were graded according to the Crawford criteria. Time to bone healing and osteoarthritis development were assessed radiologically. Complications, including skin necrosis, dorsal prominence and nail deformity, were also compared. The mean follow-up period was 18 months (range: 12-24) in the HWTT group and 19.2 months (range: 12-26) in the EBT group (p = 0.239). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean extension lag of the DIPJ, mean VAS scores and mean time to bone healing (p > 0.405). The mean DIPJ flexion was greater in the HWTT group compared with the EBT group (p = 0.001). According to the Crawford criteria, outcomes were similar in both groups (p = 0.370). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups when each complication was compared (p > 0.358). The short-term clinical and functional results of HWTT were found to be similar to those of EBT in the surgical treatment of mallet fractures.

All-suture anchors versus metal suture anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A comparison of mid-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare metal suture anchors and all-suture anchors clinically and radiologically in arthroscopic Bankart repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 67 patients (61 males, 6 females; mean age 26.0±5.8; range, 18 to 43 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between April 2009 and October 2016 were divided into two groups depending on the type of the suture anchor used in different periods. Group A comprised 32 patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair performed with metal suture anchors, and Group B comprised 35 patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair performed with all-suture anchors. The patients were clinically evaluated using Rowe scores, Constant scores, redislocation rates, and positive apprehension test rates. Radiographic evaluation was performed using the Samilson-Prieto classification to observe the development of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 41.1±10.4 (range, 30 to 60) months in Group A, and 39.6±9.4 (range, 28 to 60) months in Group B, with no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.559). No significant difference was observed between Group A and Group B in terms of mean Rowe score (89.2±13.8 [range, 40 to 100] vs. 88.7±16.9 [range, 25 to 100]; p=0.895) or Constant score (87.2±8.9 [range, 48 to 96] vs. 86.9±9.0 [range, 46 to 96]; p=0.878), which were the clinical outcomes at the final follow-up examination. Postoperative redislocation rates (3.1% vs. 2.9%, p=1.0) and positive apprehension test rates (6.3% vs. 8.6%, p=1.0) were found to be similar in both groups. According to the Samilson-Prieto classification, there was no evidence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis in any of the patients in either group. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory outcomes were obtained with the use of all-suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. All-suture anchors and metal suture anchors, have similar outcomes in the mid-term and all-suture anchors are a reliable and effective option for arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis in articular cartilage defects: short-term results of 118 patients and 2 different implants.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to share our experience with two different inlay metallic implants in the treatment of knee cartilage defects and to analyze their effects on functional scores. METHODS: This retrospective study included 118 patients operated on for focal full-thickness knee cartilage lesions, who were treated with a focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis. A cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) resurfacing implant was applied to 73 patients with a knee chondral lesion, and a biosynthetic implant was applied to 45. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the KOOS, VAS, and Tegner activity scores. RESULTS: The group with the Co-Cr-resurfacing implant showed a significantly greater improvement (p < 0.001) in the Tegner and VAS scores at the 2-year follow-up examination. The KOOS scores were similar in both groups. Median patient age was similar in both groups. All patients had a follow-up of at least 2 years. The preoperative and postoperative scores were compared and significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed. The biosynthetic implant had a higher revision rate. In the univariate analysis, age and type of implant were significantly associated with revision surgery. In the multivariate Cox-regression analysis model, the type of implant was significantly associated with revision surgery. CONCLUSION: All the patients operated with the above-mentioned implants showed significant improvements in pain and activity scores. Despite the overall good clinical results, 17% of patients with a biosynthetic implant and > 6% of patients with Co-Cr-resurfacing implant required revision surgery. Age and implant type were the main risk factors associated with revision.

Total hip arthroplasty without subtrochanteric femoral osteotomy is possible in patients with Crowe III/IV developmental dysplasia: total hip arthroplasty without femoral osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to present our THA technique without femoral shortening osteotomy that we perform for the treatment of coxarthrosis on Crowe type III/IV developmental dysplasia of the hip and to present the early clinical outcomes of our patients. METHODS: 77 patients with Crowe type III/IV developmental dysplasia of the hip, who had admitted to our clinic between 2013 and 2017, and had undergone cementless THA without femoral shortening by a single surgeon, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were called for a final evaluation and assessed by Harris Hip Score. Trendelenburg sign was observed. For radiological evaluation, routine anteroposterior and lateral hip radiography and orthoroentgenogram was used. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 38.2 (22-52) months. Pre-operative mean Harris Hip Score was 53.9 (49-62) and post-operative mean value was 82.7 (76-95). Mean duration of operation was 44.9 (39-57) min. In post-operative final evaluation only three patients (3.8%) had positive Trendelenburg sign. 3 patients (3.8%) had early dislocation. No sciatic palsy was observed in any of the patients. Revision with acetabular cage was performed for one (1.2%) patient due to protrusion development in the acetabular cup. The mean prosthesis survival rate was 98.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Total hip arthroplasty without femoral osteotomy can be considered as a successful method in selected patients with Crowe III/IV coxarthrosis. It provides good clinical outcomes in the early period, reduces surgery duration, has acceptable complication rates, has high prosthesis survival rates.

The Combination of Inlay Patellofemoral Arthroplasty and Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty for Mediopatellofemoral Osteoarthritis: A Comparison of Mid-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: To the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies in the literature related to the use of second-generation inlay patellofemoral arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty combination (inlay PFA/UKA) in the treatment of mediopatellofemoral osteoarthritis (MPFOA). The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of inlay PFA/UKA in MPFOA. METHODS: The study included 49 patients applied with inlay PFA/UKA because of MPFOA and 49 patients applied with TKA, matched one-to-one according to age, gender, body mass index, follow-up period, preoperative Knee Society Score, and range of motion. All the patients were evaluated clinically using the Knee Society Score, Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and range of motion, and were also evaluated radiologically. Complication rates and length of hospital stay were compared. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 54 ± 4 and 54.4 ± 3.9 months in inlay PFA/UKA and TKA groups, respectively. (P = .841). No statistically significant difference was determined between the 2 groups in respect of the mean clinical scores at the final follow-up examination (P ≥ .129). Total complications were fewer and length of hospital stay was shorter in the inlay PFA/UKA group than in the TKA group (P = .037 and P = .002). There was no radiographic evidence of progression of lateral compartment osteoarthritis according to Kellgren-Lawrence in any patient in the inlay PFA/UKA group. CONCLUSION: In selected patient groups, inlay PFA/UKA is an alternative to TKA, with lower complication rates, shorter length of hospital stay, and clinical and functional results similar to those of TKA without osteoarthritis progression in the unresurfaced lateral compartment in the mid-term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Unusual Horizontal Patellar Dislocation Reduced without General Anesthesia: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: Horizontal patellar dislocation is a rare clinical event, and there is no consensus on its management. We describe 2 relatively elderly patients with 2 different types of horizontal patellar dislocation who were successfully treated with closed reduction without general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Appropriate and gently managed closed reduction without general anesthesia may be successful in cases of acute horizontal patellar dislocation, provided there are no osteophytes or an injury that requires surgical treatment. With closed reduction and subsequent rehabilitation, patients can regain functional capacity quickly.

How successful are Turkish orthopedists in complying with time limit in scientific presentations?

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the durations of scientific presentations and factors affecting the rates of exceeding the time limit in presentations at 26th Turkish National Congress of Orthopedics and Traumatology, which is one of Turkey's largest nationally organized orthopedics and traumatology meetings in terms of the numbers of speakers and participators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Speech durations of Turkish orthopedists and the rates of these durations against the durations specified in the schedule were calculated. Any relationships between factors related to speakers who made presentations (age and place of work) and factors such as the day, auditorium, and hour of presentation with speech durations were investigated. Durations of sessions of sub-associations and branches were classified and statistically compared. RESULTS: Out of 480 speakers with a mean age of 47 years (range 28 to 71 years), only 171 (35.6%) completed their presentations within the time specified in the schedule. Speech durations statistically significantly increased as the age of the speakers increased. Rates of non-compliance with time limit were higher in presentations performed on the first day. There was no significant difference between meeting auditoriums and meeting hours with regards to compliance with time limit percentages. An analysis based on places of work of speakers revealed no significant difference in terms of time usage percentages. A significant difference was present between the given and used times in the sessions of Society of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, Sports Traumatology Branch, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Rates of compliance with time limit were higher in the sessions of Foot and Ankle Surgery Branch, Turkish Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedic Research. CONCLUSION: Turkish orthopedists are unsuccessful in complying with time limit in scientific presentations. Awareness should be raised on this subject and time discipline should be established with various measures and training.