ABSTRACT
In making research funding appropriations, Congress considers, in part, the percentage of applications which are approved, but cannot be funded with the existing budget. The Communicative Disorders Program will have difficulty justifying increased Congressional appropriation without an increase in the number of approved grant applications. Investigators in otolaryngology and other fields of communicative disorders are urged to submit innovative proposals of high scientific quality to be considered for funding. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) review process is explained and suggestions for improving a potential grantee's application are made.
Subject(s)
National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases , Research Support as Topic , Communication , Humans , Peer Review , United StatesABSTRACT
Perilymphatic fistulae, developing even years after stapedectomy, open a communication between the perilymph and middle ear. These fistulae constitute a potential pathway for flora of the middle ear to invade the subarachnoid space by way of the cochlear aqueduct. Our patient developed pneumococcal meningitis 14 months after stapedectomy. The history of stapedectomy in a patient with meningitis is an indication for reexploration+ion of the operative site. The appearance of fistula symptoms in patients who have had stapedectomy indicates a high risk for development of intracranial infection.
