ABSTRACT
Background: The incidence of morbidity and readmission rate after hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) is not clear. Aims: Our study aims to review our experience with HALDN, mainly the reasons for patient readmissions. Methods: Prospectively collected data on all patients undergoing HALDNs between August 2007 and June 2015 were retrieved. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes were complications and readmission etiology. Results: There were 161 nephrectomies with a median age of 51 years, 72 (44.7%) men, and 114 (70.8%) left-sided operations. Twenty-one (13%) individuals were readmitted within 30 days. There were total 25 (15.5%) readmissions during the study period. The characteristics of patients readmitted and patients not readmitted were broadly similar. Nine of 21 (43%) individuals readmitted had nonspecific findings (nonspecific findings on imaging, negative blood cultures, and raised inflammatory markers). The reasons for readmission were unrelated to nephrectomy in 24% and 19% required surgery for complications unrelated to nephrectomy. Conclusion: We observed a high readmission rate after HALDN. A significant proportion of readmissions were due to nonspecific abdominal pain associated with raised inflammatory markers and no obvious source of sepsis. Living donors should be fully informed about the risks including the possibility of complications unrelated to HALDN.
Subject(s)
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Nephrectomy/adverse effects , Nephrectomy/methods , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Kidney Transplantation , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/adverse effects , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Liver resection is associated with significant morbidity, and assessment of risk is an important part of preoperative consultations. Objective methods exist to assess operative risk, including cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX). Subjective assessment is also made in clinic, and patients perceived to be high-risk are referred for CPX at our institution. This article addresses clinicians' ability to identify patients with a higher risk of surgical complications after hepatectomy, using selection for CPX as a surrogate marker for increased operative risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data on patients undergoing hepatectomy between February 2008 and November 2013 were retrieved and the cohort divided according to CPX referral. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system. RESULTS: CPX testing was carried out before 101 of 405 liver resections during the study period. The median age was 72 and 64 in CPX and non-CPX groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The resection size was similar between the groups. No difference was noted for grade III complications between CPX and non-CPX tested-groups; however, 19 (18.8%) and 28 (9.2%) patients suffered grade IV-V complications, respectively (P = 0.009). There was no difference in long-term survival between groups (P = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: This study attempts to assess clinicians' ability to identify patients at greater risk of complications after hepatectomy. The confirmation that patients identified in this way are at greater risk of grade IV-V complications demonstrates the value of preoperative counseling. High-risk patients do not have worse long-term outcomes suggesting survival is determined by other factors, particularly disease recurrence.
