ABSTRACT
Introduction Epilepsy is a burdensome disorder for affected individuals and community. There is limited data available on the epidemiological aspects of seizures in Pakistan and further research is necessary. We aimed to fill this gap by studying this information in epilepsy patients presenting to our neurology department. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the causes and types of seizures among the target population. Method This is a cross-sectional study conducted at the Department of Neurology, Dr. Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi. In this study we evaluated the causes and types of seizures among patients presenting to our department during the two-year study duration (January 2018-December 2019). Informed consent was taken. Detailed history was taken including features of seizure episodes, age at first seizure, family history and comorbid conditions. Relevant investigations were carried out. The data was compiled to deduce the relevant information using SPSS v20.0. T-test and Chi-square were used for analyzing the data. Results A total of 996 patients presented during the study duration. Primary seizures were found in 58% cases while secondary seizures were found in 42% cases. This distribution was more equal in children with 49.6% primary seizures and 50.4% secondary seizures; the gap widened in adults with 64.3% primary seizures and 35.7% secondary seizures. The most common cause of secondary seizures was neonatal encephalopathy which was present in 18.7% patients, followed by traumatic head injury in 18.2% patients. Central nervous system (CNS) infection was the cause in 17.9% patients, cerebral tumors in 14.1% patients, stroke in 11.5%, metabolic encephalopathy in 7.4%, febrile seizures in 6.5% and CNS malformations in 5.7% patients. The top three causes in children were neonatal encephalopathy (28.3%), CNS infections (19.3%) and febrile seizures (12.7%). Adults with secondary seizures were diagnosed most often with head trauma (25.2%), cerebral tumors (19.9%) and stroke (18.4%) as causative factors. The most common type of seizures was generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures which was found in 73.0% patients followed by focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in 8.9% patients. Other types of seizures included focal aware seizures in 5.0%, mixed seizure types in 4.2%, focal impaired awareness seizures in 3.1%, absence seizures in 2.7%, myoclonic seizures in 2.0% and atonic seizures in 1.0% patients. Seizures in children were mostly generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures (75.4%), mixed seizure types (5.7%) and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (5.2%). In adults the three most common types corresponded to the overall result: generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures (71.2%), focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (11.6%) and focal aware seizures (6.6%). Conclusion We found that the most common cause of seizures overall in our study population was primary seizures, though primary and secondary seizures were more evenly present in children. Among secondary causes neonatal encephalopathy stood out as the most common cause in children; head trauma was the predominant cause in adults. Most common type of seizures overall and in adults was generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures, followed by focal to bilateral tonic-clonic and focal aware seizure types. Pediatric patients presented most often with generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures, followed by mixed seizure types and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Neurological disorders, structural or functional, are prevalent all over the world and are accompanied by physical and social morbidity. In this study, we aimed to calculate the cost of investigating neurological disorders and compare the costs incurred in a government hospital with that in a private hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted at the Dr. Ruth KM Pfau Civil Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. One hundred patients were enrolled in the study; 10 each investigated for epilepsy, cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), headache, neuropathy, myopathy, cranial nerve palsies, movement disorders, demyelinating diseases, central nervous system (CNS) infections, and dementia. Receipts and records in the patients' medical history were used for the calculation of the cost of procedures, which was then compared with the costs of these investigations in a private hospital. A bottom-up costing approach was taken with individual costs being estimated and then being grouped to calculate the overall economic burden of the disorders. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 23.0. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done to compare the mean cost (taken by the patient, covered by the government, total cost in the government hospital, and total cost in the private hospital) across diseases in government and private hospitals separately. Pearson correlation and scatter plot were also done to study the cost in private and public hospitals. p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The margin of error in the study was 5%. RESULTS: The mean age was 38.2 ± 20.5 years. Some 51% data were received from female samples. The mean income of samples was 13863.6 ± 9715.9 Pakistani Rupees (PKR) or 78.38 ± 58.29 United States Dollars (USD). The mean cost covered by government hospitals was 8866.0 ± 5071.0 PKR (53.19 ± 30.42 USD) per patient, whereas in government hospitals patients were charged on average 2662.9 ± 3774.7 PKR (16 ± 22.65 USD), while in private hospitals patients paid on average 29041.3 ± 12992.6 PKR (174.21 ± 78 USD). CONCLUSION: The costs of investigations in private hospitals were approximately three times the costs in government hospitals. The maximum cost was generated by patients being investigated for demyelinating disorders. Investigations conducted in government-run hospitals are more cost effective and these institutions should receive increased funding to cater to the maximum number of patients.
ABSTRACT
Background Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) is an immune-mediated inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy. Respiratory failure is one of its recognized and most dreaded complications, requiring ventilatory assistance. Early recognition of distinct clinical predictors of mechanical ventilation may help in the better management of GBS patients in our setup. Objective To determine the clinical predictors indicating the need for mechanical ventilation in patients with Guillain Barre Syndrome and to compare the presenting features in patients who require mechanical ventilation and who do not. Method It was a prospective observational study. A total of 100 consecutive patients, over the period of one year, were included in this study. All patients were clinically examined for limb weakness, neck weakness, bulbar and facial nerve involvement, and followed up till seven days of hospitalization for whether the patient required mechanical ventilation or not. Results were recorded on a specifically designed proforma. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). Results Out of 100 patients, 13% required mechanical ventilation. When clinical presentations were compared in patients who required mechanical ventilation and those who did not, a shorter interval between the onset of symptoms and the attainment of maximal disability, facial weakness, bulbar dysfunction, and neck weakness turned out to be significant factors (p-value<0.000). Conclusion According to these significant outcomes of our study, the course of patients with GBS leading to mechanical ventilation can be predicted on the basis of clinical presentations. So we can recommend that shorter time duration between symptom onset and peak disability, along with the presence of facial, bulbar, and neck weakness, should be taken as an indication of impending respiratory failure.
