ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to test the precision and accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) linear measurements for Le Fort I osteotomy, obtained from multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The study population consisted of 11 dried skulls submitted to 64-row MSCT and CBCT scans. Three-dimensional reconstructed images (3D-CT) were generated, and linear measurements (n=11) based on anatomical structures and landmarks of interest for Le Fort I osteotomy were performed independently by two oral and maxillofacial radiologists, twice each, using Vitrea software; this allows true 3D measurement on 3D-CT images. The results demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the inter-examiner and intra-examiner analyses, and physical and true 3D linear measurements using MSCT and CBCT images. Regarding examiner accuracy, no statistically significant differences were found for the comparisons among the physical and the MSCT and the CBCT linear measurements by either examiner. For examiners 1 and 2, the analysis intra-examiner correlation coefficient ranged from 0.87 to 0.96 and 0.82 to 0.98, respectively, using MSCT, and from 0.84 to 0.98 and 0.80 to 0.98, respectively, using CBCT, indicating almost perfect agreement for all analyses performed. 3D linear measurements obtained from MSCT and CBCT images were considered precise and accurate for Le Fort I osteotomy and thus accurate and helpful for Le Fort I osteotomy planning.
Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Osteotomy, Le Fort , Skull/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the precision and accuracy of linear measurements for Le Fort I osteotomy performed by two different imaging software programs and obtained from three-dimensional cone beam CT (3D-CBCT) images. METHODS: The study population consisted of 11 dried skulls submitted to CBCT, which generated 3D images. Linear measurements were based on craniometric anatomical landmarks pre-defined by the authors as specifically used for Le Fort I osteotomy and were identified by two radiologists twice each, independently, using Vitrea 3.8.1 (Vital Images Inc., Plymouth, MN) and open-source digital imaging communication in medicine viewer OsiriX 1.2 64-bit (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland). Subsequently, a third examiner made physical measurements using a digital caliper (167 series; Mitutoyo Sul Americana Ltd, Suzano, SP, Brazil). RESULTS: The results demonstrated a statistically significant difference between OsiriX and the gold standard, especially in the pterygoid process (TPtg L = 0.019, LLpPtg R = 0.016 and LLpPtg L = 0.012). Vitrea showed no statistical difference in comparison with the gold standard, and showed a high level of accuracy in all the measurements performed. The major difference found was 0.42 mm (LLpPtg R). Interexaminer analysis ranged from 0.90 to 0.97 using Vitrea and from 0.8 to 0.97 using OsiriX. Intraexaminer correlation coefficient ranged from 0.90 to 0.98 and from 0.84 to 0.98 for Examiners 1 and 2, respectively, using Vitrea and from 0.93 to 0.99 for Examiner 1 and from 0.64 to 0.96 for Examiner 2 using OsiriX. CONCLUSION: Vitrea may be considered as precise and accurate, insofar as it was able to perform all the 3D linear measurements. On the other hand, linear measurements performed using OsiriX were not successful in producing accurate linear measurements for Le Fort I osteotomy.
