ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Prompted by a recurring skull base multidisciplinary team debate on the necessity of securing a definitive tissue diagnosis before initiating treatment for lesions of the orbital apex, a review of anterior skull base procedures over an 11-year period was undertaken. METHODS: Data collected prospectively on cases from 2006 to 2017 were analysed. Presenting symptoms, imaging and histology findings, outcomes, complications, and impact on treatment were evaluated. All surgery was carried out endoscopically with the aid of image guidance. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients undergoing endoscopic orbital apex and/or optic canal biopsy were included. The mean patient age was 49 years. Five malignant tumours were identified, five benign tumours, seven infective cases (two tuberculosis and five fungal) and two cases of immunoglobulin G4 related disease. Two patients had non-diagnostic biopsies (one lesional) and were treated successfully as Tolosa-Hunt syndrome cases. CONCLUSION: A successful diagnosis was achieved in nearly all cases without adverse impact, other than one cerebrospinal fluid leakage case. Management was directly influenced by the outcome in all cases.
Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Orbit/surgery , Skull Base Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Skull Base Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Endoscopy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Cavity/pathology , Nasal Cavity/surgery , Orbit/diagnostic imaging , Orbit/pathology , Pain Measurement , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Factors , Skull Base Neoplasms/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To audit out-of-hours flexible endoscope disinfection practice in England and compare the findings with a previously published first audit cycle, with the 2005 ENT UK guidelines as the key intervention. METHODS: A telephone survey of the 104 ENT units in England was conducted out-of-hours, replicating the first cycle. The on-call clinician answered questions concerning access to flexible endoscopes, training, disinfection procedures and record keeping. Information regarding the clinician's trainee grade and their cross-covering duties was also acquired. Responses were compared to the first cycle results and published guidance. RESULTS: In total, 72 of the 104 units agreed to participate. The on-call clinician cleaned the flexible endoscope in 43 per cent of units. However, adequate training in disinfection only occurred in a minority of units (37 per cent), though this was an improvement from the first cycle (12 per cent). Furthermore, 27 per cent of units used an inadequate method of disinfection out-of-hours. One confounding factor may be the increase in cross-cover out-of-hours, with 68 per cent of respondents covering one or more other specialties. CONCLUSION: An overall moderate improvement in the safety of out-of-hours endoscopy in the past 10 years cannot obscure the urgent need for universal compliance with national guidelines.
