Effectiveness of Derivo® Flow Diverter Device in the Endovascular Treatment of Cerebrovascular Aneurysms.

AIM: To report our experience with flow diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, and to share the efficacy and clinical results of the Derivo® flow diverter device in the endovascular treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a regional training and research hospital between October 2015 and March 2020 after approval by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee. The radiology and file records of 21 patients with cerebrovascular aneurysms treated endovascularly using a Derivo® flow diverter device were examined. RESULTS: As per our findings, flow diverter devices were used to treat 27 aneurysms from 21 cases. Among the treated aneurysms, 3, 2, and 22 were in the middle cerebral artery, anterior communicating artery, and internal cerebral artery, respectively. Eight of the patients with a mean age of 56.9 years presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Derivo® flow diverters were used alone in 19 cases, whereas concurrent diverter device and coiling were used in only 3 patients. Complete closure of the aneurysms was observed in 3 (14.2%) cases; meanwhile, a 50% reduction in aneurysm size was observed in 2 (9.5%) cases. Complete aneurysm closure occurred in 20 cases (95%) at the 6-month follow-up. Mortality and morbidity each occurred in 1 (4.7%) case. CONCLUSION: Flow diverter devices provide an efficient and safe method of treatment, especially for fusiform, large, giant, widenecked intracranial aneurysms. Endovascular coil embolization treatment is deemed inappropriate for small aneurysms.

The parietooccipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach for pineal tumors.

Access to the pineal region has always been a challenge for neurosurgeons. The parietooccipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach is a slight variation of the traditional occipital transtentorial approach that provides adequate exposure to the lesions of the pineal region without introducing additional risks. In this study, the modified parietooccipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach is discussed including step-by-step anatomical cadaveric dissections and operative images. 27 adult patients (age > 18) who were operated over a 30-year period (1992-2022) by the senior author (M.N.P.) at two clinics, Marmara University, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey and Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey were analyzed. Only pineal region tumors were included in the analysis. Falcotentorial meningiomas and vascular lesions including cavernomas were excluded. 5 cadaveric specimens were dissected step by step following the surgical approach. Each step was documented using a Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera with Canon 100 mm Macro Lens. Step by step images of the dissections were presented including comparison with surgical images. Additional illustrations were used to describe the surgical corridor. The surgical corridor is maintained anterior to the parietooccipital sulcus along the medial of the precuneus. No retraction to the calcarine sulcus resulted in no postoperative hemianopsia. The neurovascular structures along the surgical corridor along with the nuances of the tentorium incision and splenium resection are discussed. The parietooccipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach provides a wide and safe corridor for surgical resection of pineal tumors.

The Carotid Endarterectomy Cadaveric Investigation for Cranial Nerve Injuries: Anatomical Study.

Cerebral stroke continues to be one of the leading causes of mortality and long-term morbidity; therefore, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains to be a popular treatment for both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis. Cranial nerve injuries remain one of the major contributor to the postoperative morbidities. Anatomical dissections were carried out on 44 sides of 22 cadaveric heads following the classical CEA procedure to investigate the variations of the local anatomy as a contributing factor to cranial nerve injuries. Concurrence of two variations was found to be important in hypoglossal nerve injury: the presence of a direct smaller vein in proximity of the carotid bifurcation, and the intersection of the hypoglossal nerve (HN) with this vein. Based on the sample investigated, this variation was observed significantly higher on the right side. Awareness of possible anatomical variations and early ligation of any small veins can significantly decrease iatrogenic injury risk.