Examining the Association Between Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion and Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Among U.S. Women.

INTRODUCTION: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates are rising among women in the United States, increasing the importance of routine STI testing. Beginning in 2014, some states expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, providing health coverage to most individuals in and near poverty. Here, we investigate whether Medicaid expansion changed rates of STI testing among U.S. women. METHODS: We analyzed nationally representative 2011-2017 National Survey of Family Growth data from U.S. women ages 15-44. Using difference-in-differences analysis, we assessed whether Medicaid expansion was associated with within-state changes in the prevalence of STI testing in the past 12 months, among women overall and by race/ethnicity and sexual orientation, during each year following Medicaid expansion. Models were adjusted for individual- and state-level demographic and socioeconomic factors. RESULTS: Our sample included 14,196 U.S. women. Medicaid expansion was associated with higher STI testing rates, which increased over time. By 3 years post-expansion, expansion states had increased STI testing by 12.7 percentage points more than nonexpansion states (95% confidence interval [CI] [2.5, 23.0], p = .016). This association was imprecisely estimated within racial/ethnic and sexual orientation subgroups, but trended strongest among white, Latina, and heterosexual women, followed by Black and bisexual women (who tested more often at baseline). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion is associated with increased STI testing among U.S. women; these benefits grew over time but varied by both race/ethnicity and sexual orientation. State governments that fail to expand Medicaid may harm their residents' health by allowing more spread of STIs.

Affordable Care Act state Medicaid expansion and human papillomavirus vaccination among adolescent and young adult US women: A national study.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the impact of Affordable Care Act (ACA) state Medicaid expansion on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination among both adolescent and young adult US women. DATA SOURCES: We used state-level data on ACA Medicaid expansion and individual-level data on US women aged 15-25 years living at or below 138% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL) from the 2011-2017 waves of the National Survey of Family Growth (N = 2408). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a quasi-experimental study examining the association between ACA state Medicaid expansion and HPV vaccination initiation among eligible adolescent and young adult US women. METHODS: We used linear probability modeling within a difference-in-differences approach, adjusting for individual- and state-level covariates. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Adjusting for individual- and state-level covariates, we found a negative association between Medicaid expansion and HPV vaccination among US women aged 15-25 years living in low-income households in the first year post-expansion (coefficient: -15.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -30.1, -1.6 points). In contrast, we observed a positive association in the third year post-expansion (coefficient: 20.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.8, 42.9 points). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion may have increased HPV vaccination among adolescent and young adult US women over time. Additional research is needed to identify the mechanisms and differential effects of Medicaid expansion on HPV vaccination among diverse subgroups of US women.

Association Between New-Onset Medicaid Home Care and Family Caregivers' Health.

Importance: More than 17 million people in the US provide uncompensated care for adults with physical or cognitive limitations. Such caregiving is associated with worse mental and physical health, yet little research has investigated how publicly funded home care might ameliorate these harms. Objective: To investigate the association between Medicaid home care services and family caregivers' health. Design Setting and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study used data from the 1996 to 2017 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. Data on all household members were collected in 5 interviews over 2 years. Person-level difference-in-difference models were used to isolate within-person changes associated with new onset of Medicaid home care. The Medical Expenditures Panel Survey longitudinal data sets included 331 202 individuals (approximately 10% excluded owing to loss to follow-up). Adult (age ≥21 years) members of households that contained at least 1 person with limited activities of daily living were included in our study. The analysis itself was performed from March to August of 2020. Exposures: New onset of regular (≥1 time per month) Medicaid home care in the household. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-rated mental and physical health (planned prior to beginning the study). Results: The study population was 14 013 adults; 7232 were "likely caregivers," or nondisabled adult coresidents of someone with activities of daily living limitations. Overall, 962 likely caregivers were ever exposed to Medicaid home care in the household; for 563, we observed the onset. Of likely caregivers exposed to Medicaid home care, 479 (50%) were women; 296 (31%) were White non-Hispanic, 309 (31%) were Hispanic or Latinx, and 279 (29%) were Black non-Hispanic individuals, respectively; 326 (34%) had less than a high school education; and 300 (31%) were in or near poverty. Median age of participants was 51 (interquartile range, 39-62) years. New-onset Medicaid home care was associated with a 0.08 standard deviation improvement in likely caregivers' self-rated mental health (95% CI, 0.01-0.14; P = .02) measured 1 to 6 months after onset, equivalent to a 3.39% improvement (95% CI, 0.05%-6.33%) over their average preonset mental health. No association with self-rated physical health was found (<0.001 standard deviations; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.06; P = .99). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, Medicaid home care was associated with improvement in caregiver self-rated mental health, but not with any short-term change in self-rated physical health. When evaluating the social value of home care programs, policy makers should consider spillover benefits to caregivers.

Protective Misperception? Prospective Study of Weight Self-Perception and Blood Pressure in Adolescents With Overweight and Obesity.

PURPOSE: Underestimating one's weight is often seen as a barrier to weight loss. However, recent research has shown that weight underperception may be beneficial, with lower future weight gain and fewer depressive symptoms. Here, we examine the relationship between adolescent weight underperception and future blood pressure. METHODS: Using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, we obtained a nationally representative sample of 2,463 adolescents with overweight and obesity (students in grades 8-12 in 1996). We used multivariable linear regression to prospectively examine the relationship between weight self-perception in adolescence and blood pressure in adulthood (year 2008; follow-up rate 80.3%), controlling for age, gender, race/ethnicity, smoking, alcohol consumption, education level, household income, and body mass index. Additional analyses were stratified by gender and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Youth with overweight/obesity who underperceived their weight had lower blood pressure in adulthood than those who perceived themselves to be overweight. The decrease in systolic blood pressure was -2.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -4.3, -0.7; p = .006). Although the interaction by gender was statistically insignificant (p = .289), important differences appeared upon stratification by gender. Young men showed no significant difference in adult blood pressure related to weight self-perception. Conversely, in young women, weight underperception was associated with an average decrease in systolic blood pressure of -4.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -7.0, -1.7; p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to conventional wisdom, weight underperception is associated with improved health markers in young women. The observed differences in blood pressure are clinically relevant in magnitude, and interventions to correct weight underperception should be re-examined for unintended consequences.