ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Over decades, colostomies have been done through open method, but laparoscopic creation of an intestinal stoma is safe, feasible and has distinct advantages over conventional techniques in specific procedures. The aim of this study compares operative and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open sigmoid loop colostomy formation for temporary fecal diversion. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A single institution, comparative study conducted in the department of surgery for patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open sigmoid loop colostomy. The 2 years' study was from December 1, 2013, to November 30, 2015. Subjects were prospectively enrolled in the study after informed consent, both genders of >12 years of age. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0. Variables were tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, compared using unpaired t-test/Mann-Whitney Test, Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled; laparoscopy group - 29 patients (46.77%) versus open group - 33 patients (53.22%). Laparoscopic group/open surgery group showed less blood loss (20.69 + 17.71 ml / 121.97 + 35.29ml, P-value 0.0005), lower requirement of analgesics (4.28 ± 1.76 days/6.88 ± 2.75 days), shorter hospital stay (8.79 ± 5.57 days and 11.73 ± 6.61 days, P = 0.001), early return of the bowel function and tolerance to diet. Complications and readmission requirement for any complication was lower in the laparoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sigmoid loop colostomy is a simple alternative to open sigmoid loop colostomy with respect to postoperative pain, earlier return of bowel function, lower analgesic requirement, and lesser hospital stay.
ABSTRACT
Epidural abscess after epidural catheterization is a rare complication. Neurological manifestations vary and the patient described here presented with complete paraplegia. He was managed by surgical decompression and did well postope-ratively. We present a case report and review of the literature of thoracic epidural abscess following catheterization for epidural analgesia with near total neurological recovery.
Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Epidural Abscess/microbiology , Flail Chest/surgery , Spinal Diseases/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Combined Modality Therapy , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Epidural Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Flail Chest/complications , Humans , Male , Paraplegia/complications , Radiography , Spinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is ambiguity about the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in inguinal mesh hernioplasty. We have tried to assess the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized double blind placebo controlled study was conducted which included 55 patients who underwent an inguinal mesh hernioplasty over a 2 year period. The patients were evaluated for the status of the suture line as well as the presence of wound infection. RESULTS: Out of 55 patients 29 were randomized to the antibiotic arm and 26 to the placebo group. The groups were well matched for all variables studied excluding wound infections, which occurred at a rate of 10.34% (n = 3) in the antibiotic group and 15.38% (n = 4) in the placebo arm, (p > 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study did not document any statistically significant difference observed between those who received antibiotics and those receiving placebo in terms of any of the prognostic end points evaluated for Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty.
