Pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of sublingual buprenorphine, alone or in combination with naloxone: lack of dose proportionality.

OBJECTIVE: Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone combinations are effective pharmacotherapies for opioid dependence, but doses are considerably greater than analgesic doses. Because dose-related buprenorphine opioid agonist effects may plateau at higher doses, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of expected therapeutic doses. DESIGN: The first experiment examined a range of sublingual buprenorphine solution doses with an ascending dose design (n = 12). The second experiment examined a range of doses of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone tablets along with one dose of buprenorphine alone tablets with a balanced crossover design (n = 8). PARTICIPANTS: Twenty nondependent, opioid-experienced volunteers. METHODS: Subjects in the solution experiment received sublingual buprenorphine solution in single ascending doses of 4, 8, 16 and 32 mg. Subjects in the tablet experiment received sublingual tablets combining buprenorphine 4, 8 and 16 mg with naloxone at a 4 : 1 ratio or buprenorphine 16 mg alone, given as single doses. Plasma buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and naloxone concentrations and pharmacodynamic effects were measured for 48-72 hours after administration. RESULTS: Buprenorphine concentrations increased with dose, but not proportionally. Dose-adjusted areas under the concentration-time curve for buprenorphine 32 mg solution, buprenorphine 1 6 mg tablet and buprenorphine/naloxone 16/4 mg tablet were only 54 +/- 16%, 70 +/- 25% and 72 +/- 17%, respectively, of that of the 4 mg dose of sublingual solution or tablet. No differences were found between dose strengths for most subjective and physiological effects. Pupil constriction at 48 hours after administration of solution did, however, increase with dose. Subjects reported greater intoxication with the 32 mg solution dose, even though acceptability of the 4 mg dose was greatest. Naloxone did not change the bioavailability or effects of the buprenorphine 16 mg tablet. CONCLUSION: Less than dose-proportional increases in plasma buprenorphine concentrations may contribute to the observed plateau for most pharmacodynamic effects as the dose is increased.

Pharmacokinetics of doxercalciferol, a new vitamin D analogue that lowers parathyroid hormone.

BACKGROUND: This is the first detailed pharmacokinetic report published on the administration of doxercalciferol [1alpha(OH)D(2)] recently introduced to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: 1alpha(OH)D(2) was administered in a range of single and multiple doses to volunteers with and without normal renal and/or hepatic function. Subsequent serial blood samples were assayed by HPLC/radioimmunoassay for the metabolite 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(2) [1,25(OH)(2)D(2)], the major active species. RESULTS: Bioavailability of 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) from a single 5 micro g 1alpha(OH)D(2) oral-capsule dose was estimated to be normally approximately 42% of that from a 5 micro g intravenous injection. Steady-state serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) were attainable within 8 day, and fluctuated approximately 2.5-fold from peak to trough when oral 1alpha(OH)D(2) doses were taken every second day, and the terminal half-life was 34+/-14 h. Mean steady-state serum concentrations rose less than proportionally (from 20 to 45 pg/ml) on increasing oral 1alpha(OH)D(2) doses from 5 to 15 micro g every 48 h. Renal patients showed 39+/-37% increase in serum 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) concentration during 3-4 h haemodialysis sessions, but no other difference in steady-state pharmacokinetics was found between these or hepatically impaired patients and normal subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Given the sensitivity limits of current assays, the pharmacokinetics of this and other vitamin-D compounds is best elucidated from steady-state studies. The pharmacokinetics of 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) from 1alpha(OH)D(2) doses appears to be similar to that of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) from 1alpha(OH)D(3) doses, albeit D(3) data have to date largely derived from single-dose studies. Deviation of 1,25(OH)(2)D(2) pharmacokinetics from linearity appears to be marginal enough to be clinically manageable with adequate precaution.