Increasing Operating Room Efficiency with Shop Floor Management: an Empirical, Code-Based, Retrospective Analysis.

With increasing economic pressure on health care, modern hospital management is focusing at industrial optimization techniques to improve efficiency while maintaining quality. Shop floor management, a technique of code-based, process-oriented guidance directly on site is a method of lean management intended to increase efficiency in the operating room. In the literature, there is only scant evidence that the introduction of this technique alone can increase efficiency. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine whether a single tool alone can significantly improve codes. We performed an empirical, retrospective analysis of a number of codes from 3800 operations during two periods of comparison: upon introduction of shop floor management, and one year thereafter. Data was extracted from the Hospital Information System and transferred to a database. There was no statistically significant change in the relevant codes chosen, whether specific to the operating room (turnover time, first patient in the room, waiting times for anesthesia and surgery (p = 0.637) or to planning stability (scheduled, cancelled (p = 0.505), unscheduled and total operations performed (p = 0.984)). There were absolute changes, such as a reduction in the turnover time from 17:37 min to 16:26 min, even though not statistically significant (p = 0.238). Implementation of shop floor management as a single intervention is not appropriate to achieve a significant, continuous improvement in codes. A combination with other techniques such as detailed process analyses is definitely required. This could be important additional information for units using Lean Health Care strategies.

Prophylactic salpingectomy for prevention of ovarian cancer at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Most serous ovarian cancers are now understood to originate in the fallopian tubes. Removing the tubes (salpingectomy) likely reduces the risk of developing high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Numerous gynaecological societies now recommend prophylactic (or opportunistic) salpingectomy at the time of gynaecological surgery in appropriate women, and this is widely done. Salpingectomy at the time of non-gynaecological surgery has not been explored and may present an opportunity for primary prevention of ovarian cancer. METHODS: This study investigated whether prophylactic salpingectomy with the intention of reducing the risk of developing ovarian cancer would be accepted and could be accomplished at the time of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Women aged at least 45 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recruited. They were counselled and offered prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cholecystectomy. Outcome measures were rate of accomplishment of salpingectomy, time and procedural steps needed for salpingectomy, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were included in the study. The rate of acceptance of salpingectomy was approximately 60 per cent. Salpingectomy was performed in 98 of 105 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (93·3 per cent) and not accomplished because of poor visibility or adhesions in seven (6·7 per cent). Median additional operating time was 13 (range 4-45) min. There were no complications attributable to salpingectomy. One patient presented with ovarian cancer 28 months after prophylactic salpingectomy; histological re-evaluation of the tubes showed a previously undetected, focal serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic salpingectomy can be done during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

ANTECEDENTES: La mayoría de carcinomas serosos de ovario se originan en las trompas de Falopio. La exéresis de las trompas (salpingectomía) probablemente reduce el riesgo de desarrollar un carcinoma seroso ovárico de alto grado. Numerosas sociedades ginecológicas recomiendan efectuar una salpingectomía profiláctica (u oportunista) en el momento de una cirugía ginecológica en determinadas mujeres, y esta conducta está ampliamente difundida. Sin embargo, no se ha analizado la realización de la salpingectomía durante cirugías no ginecológicas como forma de prevención primaria del carcinoma ovárico. MÉTODOS: Determinar si la salpingectomía profiláctica con intención de reducir el riesgo de desarrollar cáncer de ovario sería aceptada y podría llevarse a cabo durante una colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva. Se reclutaron mujeres ≥ 45 años de edad programadas para colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva. A todas ellas se les aconsejó y ofreció la realización de una salpingectomía bilateral profiláctica en el momento de su colecistectomía. Las variables analizadas fueron la tasa de realización de la salpingectomía, la duración y las etapas quirúrgicos para efectuar este procedimiento, y las complicaciones. RESULTADOS: La aceptación de la salpingectomía fue aproximadamente del 60%. La salpingectomía se realizó en 98 de 105 colecistectomías laparoscópicas (93%) y no se pudo realizar en 7 pacientes (7%) por escasa visibilidad o adherencias. La mediana del tiempo quirúrgico adicional fue de 13 (rango 4-45) minutos. No hubo complicaciones atribuibles a la salpingectomía. Una paciente presentó cáncer de ovario 28 meses después de la salpingectomía profiláctica; la reevaluación histológica de las trompas mostró un carcinoma intraepitelial seroso focal tubárico (serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma, STIC) no detectado previamente. CONCLUSIÓN: La salpingectomía profiláctica se puede realizar durante la colecistectomía laparoscópica electiva.

GPR55 promotes migration and adhesion of colon cancer cells indicating a role in metastasis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tumour cell migration and adhesion constitute essential features of metastasis. G-protein coupled receptor 55 (GPR55), a lysophospholipid receptor, has been shown to play an important role in carcinogenesis. Here, we investigated the involvement of GPR55 in migration and metastasis of colon cancer cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Adhesion and migration assays using the highly metastatic colon cancer cell line HCT116 and an in vivo assay of liver metastasis were performed. The GPR55 antagonist CID16020046, cannabidiol, a putative GPR55 antagonist and GPR55 siRNA were used to block GPR55 activity in HCT116 colon cancer cells. KEY RESULTS: HCT116 cells showed a significant decrease in adhesion to endothelial cells and in migration after blockade with CID16020046 or cannabidiol. The inhibitory effects of CID16020046 or cannabidiol were averted by GPR55 siRNA knock down in cancer cells. The integrity of endothelial cell monolayers was increased after pretreatment of HCT116 cells with the antagonists or after GPR55 siRNA knockdown while pretreatment with lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI), the endogenous ligand of GPR55, decreased integrity of the monolayers. LPI also induced migration in GPR55 overexpressing HCT116 cells that was blocked by GPR55 antagonists. In a mouse model of metastasis, the arrest of HCT116 cancer cells in the liver was reduced after treatment with CID16020046 or cannabidiol. Increased levels of LPI (18:0) were found in colon cancer patients when compared with healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GPR55 is involved in the migratory behaviour of colon carcinoma cells and may serve as a pharmacological target for the prevention of metastasis. © 2015 The British Pharmacological Society.