ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Blockade of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(2A) receptors reportedly mediates or modulates the ability of isoflurane to produce immobility during noxious stimulation and would thereby influence MAC (the minimum alveolar concentration required to suppress movement in response to noxious stimulation in 50% of subjects). However, no data are yet available regarding the role of this receptor in the immobilizing action of sevoflurane. In this study, we examined how prior intraperitoneal administration of either the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist altanserin or the 5-HT(2C/2B) receptor antagonist SB 206553 might affect sevoflurane MAC in rats. METHODS: Three groups of six male Wistar rats weighing 250-350 g each received one of the following drugs dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide intraperitoneally 30 min before MAC testing: (1) altanserin 10 mg/kg; (2) SB 206553 10 mg/kg; (3) no drug (vehicle control). MAC was defined as the average of the concentrations that just prevented or just permitted movement in response to clamping the tail for 1 min. RESULTS: The rank order of MAC values obtained after intraperitoneal drug pretreatment and sevoflurane exposure was altanserin < SB 206553 < vehicle control. CONCLUSION: Considering the low levels of 5-HT(2B) receptors within the CNS, this result suggests that 5-HT(2A) and the 5-HT(2C) receptors are present within the neural circuitry influencing sevoflurane MAC. Blockade of 5-HT(2A) and/or 5-HT(2C) receptors may modulate the immobility produced by sevoflurane during noxious stimulation.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Immobilization , Methyl Ethers/pharmacology , Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Animals , Indoles/pharmacology , Ketanserin/analogs & derivatives , Ketanserin/pharmacology , Male , Pyridines/pharmacology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , SevofluraneABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We studied the clinical management and prognosis of pregnant women with a history of abruption, as well as the associated risk factors. METHODS: We reviewed the cases of 23 patients with a history of abruption and 66 patients with abruption. RESULTS: The recurrence rate of abruption was 4.3%. Intentional care prolonged gestational age in most patients. Although the incidence of abruption was low (0.44%), the consequences could be perinatal death and maternal disseminated vascular coagulation (DIC). CONCLUSION: To prevent abruption recurrence, careful monitoring during hospitalization is important. Both clinical findings and transabdominal echography are useful in diagnosing abruption.
