Retinoblastoma caused by an RB1 variant with unusually low penetrance in a Danish family.

Retinoblastoma is the most common eye cancer in children. It is caused by pathogenic alterations of both alleles of the tumor suppressor gene RB1. In heritable retinoblastoma, a constitutional RB1 variant predisposes the cells to tumor formation, and loss of the other allele is a prerequisite for the development of retinoblastoma. Heritable retinoblastoma is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner; however, the majority of cases are the result of a de novo pathogenic RB1 variant. Penetrance is usually high (>90%), but with marked inter-familial variability. In some families, penetrance is incomplete and family members who develop tumors tend to remain unilaterally affected. Moreover, some families with low penetrance also show a parent-of-origin effect. We describe a patient with unilateral retinoblastoma caused by a previously unreported likely pathogenic RB1 variant (c.1199T>C) that disrupts a highly conserved amino acid residue within the A-box functional domain. Segregation analysis showed that the variant had unusually low penetrance as nine non-affected family members carried the same variant. We emphasize the use of genetic analysis on tumor DNA for classifying the RB1 variant, and underline the challenges in clinical management and counseling of families carrying the specific RB1 variant.

Danish heritable retinoblastoma survivors' perspectives on reproductive choices: "It's important for me, not to pass on this condition".

Despite reporting an overall normal life, survivors of heritable retinoblastoma face numerous physical and psychosocial issues. In particular, reproductive decision-making is often complex and difficult. This study aims to examine survivors' reflections on passing on heritable retinoblastoma to their children, how survivors approach their reproductive choices, and how the healthcare system can optimize counseling and support. Semi-structured interviews with Danish adult survivors of heritable retinoblastoma were qualitatively analyzed to explore their experiences. Participants were recruited from the Retinoblastoma Survivorship Clinic, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Thematic data analysis was conducted followed by a condensing process specifically for the subthemes relating to reproductive choices. A common subtheme for all participants was a strong wish to avoid passing on retinoblastoma to their children. The participants emphasized the various medical, practical, emotional, and moral issues impacting their final reproductive choice in the process of family planning to conceive a child unaffected by retinoblastoma. Some had no option other than to conceive naturally and hope for an unaffected baby; while others weighed the pros and cons of choosing natural conception with prenatal testing and then considering termination of pregnancy (in case of an affected fetus) versus choosing fertility treatment with preimplantation genetic testing to achieve an unaffected pregnancy. Several participants underlined the complexity of their decisions, and also expressed feelings of guilt, both toward their affected child, and guilt for putting their partner through many difficult decisions and obstacles due to their genetic condition. Our findings demonstrate how one family-planning decision is not unequivocally "better" or easier than another. Healthcare professionals must provide the necessary information and tools to support the individual's unique decision-making process. Survivors' autonomy and individual needs, as well as the numerous and diverse aspects of heritable retinoblastoma, should be carefully considered.

Genetic testing in adult survivors of retinoblastoma in Denmark: A study of the experience and impact of genetic testing many years after initial diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Survivors with heritable retinoblastoma (RB) face a high risk for second primary cancer and RB in their children. Knowledge of heredity can support second cancer surveillance, convey reproductive options or early diagnosis of RB in their offspring. Currently, all newly diagnosed Danish patients with RB are offered genetic testing, as opposed to a minority of survivors diagnosed before available DNA testing. OBJECTIVE: To examine RB survivors' response to unsolicited contact, uptake of genetic testing, and RB1 variant detection rate, and to qualitatively evaluate the experience and overall impact of genetic testing for heritable RB. METHODS: Genetically untested adult RB survivors were invited to receive genetic counseling, undergo genetic testing for heritable RB and complete an eye examination. The number of responses, uptake of genetic testing and genetic results are descriptively reported. Additionally, responding survivors participated in a qualitative interview study of the perceived impact of genetic testing. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: Among invited RB survivors, 58% responded. Of these, 88% opted for genetic counseling and genetic testing. A diagnosis of heritable RB was established in 23% of RB survivors. Interestingly, all of these survivors were unilaterally affected. Analysis of data from the interviews revealed three recurring themes regarding the impact of genetic counseling and testing several years after initial diagnosis: 'Risk of what?', 'Knowledge is important' and 'Impact of the result'. The possible risk ofsecond cancer and RB in their children was new knowledge for several participants; however, in general, the participants appreciated receiving genetic information and certainty about heredity. Accordingly, the impact of genetic counseling and testing was perceived in a positive way. CONCLUSION: Overall, RB survivors valued the opportunity to receive genetic counseling and undergo genetic testing many years after diagnosis. Responding RB survivors appreciated the invitation to test, felt well-informed and described little decisional conflict regarding their decision-making, valuing the genetic information and certainty. Heritable RB was confirmed in 23% of the previously untested RB survivors. These individuals emphasized the value of knowing and being proactive regarding both reproduction and cancer risk.

Living with heritable retinoblastoma and the perceived role of regular follow-up at a retinoblastoma survivorship clinic: 'That is exactly what I have been missing'.

OBJECTIVE: To explore living with heritable retinoblastoma, specifically survivors' perceived role of regular follow-up at a retinoblastoma survivorship clinic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Adult survivors of heritable retinoblastoma were recruited from the Retinoblastoma Survivorship Clinic, Aarhus University Hospital. Ten survivors participated in individual explorative, semistructured interviews. Thematic data analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Five key themes relating to vision, social life, family, second cancer risk and the healthcare system were identified. Subthemes relating to the Retinoblastoma Survivorship Clinic included the retinoblastoma coordinator, cancer risk, psychosocial support and genetic knowledge. The retinoblastoma-related physical and psychosocial issues influenced survivors' everyday living; however, the opportunity to live a normal life varied considerably, with the majority experiencing no major limitations. The need for specialised management and a coordinator was emphasised to be the main value of the Retinoblastoma Survivorship Clinic. CONCLUSION: Despite reporting an overall normal life and no major limitations in daily living activities, our data confirm that heritable retinoblastoma impacts several aspects of daily living. Uniquely, this study demonstrates that the main value of the Retinoblastoma Survivorship Clinic was a specialised contact person and coordinator in the healthcare system, providing continuous and necessary management and guidance after retinoblastoma treatment, and for all aspects of health related to heritable retinoblastoma. The needs of heritable retinoblastoma survivors are complex and extensive, and the specific role of the healthcare system to support survivorship should be prioritised, specialised and multidisciplinary.

Incidence and Mortality of Second Primary Cancers in Danish Patients With Retinoblastoma, 1943-2013.

Importance: In heritable retinoblastoma, there is a significantly increased risk of second primary cancers (SPCs). Improved knowledge about the incidence and influence of heritability and treatment is important during therapy for patients with retinoblastoma. Objective: To assess the incidence of SPC in patients diagnosed with retinoblastoma in Denmark from 1943 to 2013 with a focus on heritability and the association of external radiotherapy with mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from the Danish Ocular Oncology Group Database containing complete data on all patients diagnosed with retinoblastoma , and obtained from the Danish Cancer Registry, which includes information on all patients with cancer from 1943 to December 31, 2013. Data analysis was conducted from December 1, 2017, to October 1, 2019. Data on 323 patients were included. Exposures: Heritability and retinoblastoma treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Standardized incidence rate, excess absolute risk, cumulative incidence of SPC, and mortality from SPC. Association of heritability and treatment with outcomes was estimated. Results: Of the 323 patients included in the analysis, 181 were men (56%), 133 had heritable retinoblastoma (41%), and 190 had nonheritable retinoblastoma (59%). The median age at diagnosis of SPC was 32.4 (interquartile range, 15.4-43.9) years in patients with heritable retinoblastoma and 38.6 (interquartile range, 20.5-49.4) years in those with nonheritable retinoblastoma. Twenty-five SPCs were identified in patients with heritable retinoblastoma vs 14 in patients with nonheritable retinoblastoma. Standardized incidence rate (SIR) of SPC in patients with heritable retinoblastoma was 11.39 (95% CI, 7.37-16.81) with an excess absolute risk of 70 cases per 10 000 person-years; the highest SIRs were for sarcoma (181.13; 95% CI, 98.94-303.92) and malignant melanoma (26.78; 95% CI, 9.78-58.30). The SIR for SPC in patients with nonheritable retinoblastoma was 1.52 (95% CI, 0.81-2.60). The cumulative incidence of SPCs at age 60 years was significantly higher in patients with heritable retinoblastoma (51%) compared with those with nonheritable retinoblastoma (13%) (P < .001) (hazard ratio, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.5-10.3). No significant differences were identified in overall risk of SPC in patients with heritable retinoblastoma treated with 3 different modalities: external radiotherapy, plaque (but no external) radiotherapy, and enucleation only, but an increased proportion of sarcomas was noted in the irradiated field. Mortality due to SPC was also higher in survivors of heritable retinoblastoma compared with those with nonheritable retinoblastoma (cumulative mortality, 34% vs 12% at age 60 years; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that the incidence and mortality associated with SPC were significantly higher in patients with heritable retinoblastoma vs patients with nonheritable retinoblastoma. The largest increases in risk were noted for sarcoma and malignant melanoma. External radiotherapy did not appear to increase the risk. These findings are relevant when treating patients with retinoblastoma to manage the risk for SPC.

Danish retinoblastoma patients 1943-2013 - genetic testing and clinical implications.

BACKGROUND: In heritable retinoblastoma there is a 50% risk of transmitting the RB1 mutation, and offspring carriers have more than 90% risk of developing retinoblastoma. Today, all newly diagnosed retinoblastoma patients in Denmark are screened for mutations in RB1, as opposed to only a minority of patients diagnosed before DNA testing was offered. Knowledge of heredity increases the chance of early diagnosis in offspring, leading to improved prognosis. We present data from the Danish retinoblastoma patients that emphasize the need for genetic counseling and RB1 screening in all untested retinoblastoma survivors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data are extracted from The Danish Ocular Oncology Group Database, a national population database containing data on all Danish retinoblastoma patients since 1943. RESULTS: In total 323 retinoblastoma patients have been diagnosed between 1943 and 2013. Since 1963, the rate has been stable around 1 per 14 000 live births with 95% of the patients surviving their retinoblastoma. Stratifying data on the time of diagnosis and status of genetic testing, the number of screened patients gradually increased from 5% in the beginning of the period to 96% in the last five-year period. A cohort of 181 retinoblastoma survivors with sporadic disease (15% heritable) did not receive genetic testing. Since the introduction of routine testing, one of 14 sporadic unilateral patients tested (7%) has been identified with a germline mutation. Before routine testing, five additional sporadic unilateral patients have been identified as heritable. CONCLUSION: Only a minority of Danish retinoblastoma patients diagnosed before routine genetic testing was offered have been RB1 screened. To counsel the remaining untested patients and their families sufficiently regarding the risk to offspring and elevated risk of second primary cancers, we recommend information and access to genetic counseling and RB1 screening. This has ethical, psychological and possible economic consequences, and should be handled with caution.

Interactive 3D computer model of the human corneolimbal region: crypts, projections and stem cells.

PURPOSE: This study aims to clarify the existence of and to map the localization of different proposed stem cell niches in the corneal limbal region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One human eye was cut into 2200 consecutive sections. Every other section was stained with haematoxylin and eosin, digitized at low and high magnification, aligned, 3D reconstructed and visualized using interactive 3D visualization software. The visualization software has interactive tools that make free rotations in all directions possible and makes it possible to create virtual sections independent of the original cutting plan. In all, one low-magnification and 24 high-magnification interactive 3D models were created. Immunohistochemistry against stem cell markers p63 and ΔNp63α was performed as a supplement to the 3D models. RESULTS: Using the interactive 3D models, we identified three types of stem cell niches in the limbal region: limbal epithelial crypts (LECs), limbal crypts (LCs) and focal stromal projections (FSPs). In all, eight LECs, 25 LCs and 105 FSPs were identified in the limbal region. The LECs, LCs and FSPs were predominantly located in the superior limbal region with seven LECs, 19 LCs and 93 FSPs in the superior limbal region and one LEC, six LCs and 12 FSPs in the inferior limbal region. Only few LECs, LCs and FSPs were localized nasally and temporally. CONCLUSION: Interactive 3D models are a powerful tool that may help to shed more light on the existence and spatial localization of the different stem cell niches (LECs, LCs and FSPs) in the corneal limbal region.

Visual outcome, local tumour control, and eye preservation after 106Ru/Rh brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma.

To study the visual outcome, local tumour control, and eye preservation 5 years after ruthenium/rhodium 106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma. The study included 55 consecutive patients treated by 106Ru/Rh brachytherapy for a choroidal melanoma during the period 1988-2000 and followed through 2004. The 5-year probability for not losing at least 5 Snellen lines was 59% (n = 45), for retaining a visual acuity of 0.33 or better was 28% (n = 34), and for retaining better than 0.1 was 40% (n = 45). The 5-year probability for no local recurrence was 73% and for eye preservation 72% (n = 55). 106Ru/Rh brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma resulted in a clinically significant vision loss, no local recurrence, and eye preservation in most patients after 5 years. 106Ru/Rh brachytherapy can be regarded as a good treatment option for small and medium-sized tumours but not for large tumours.