Simultaneous laparoscopic adrenalectomy and laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery - new experience with port placement.

The aim of the study was to describe simultaneous laparoscopic adrenalectomy and laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery, to discuss the details of a convenient laparoscopic approach and the way of port placement, as well as to present a review of the literature concerning combined laparoscopic procedures. A 72-year-old woman was admitted to our department because of a tumor of the right adrenal gland and a small tumor of the right kidney. The patient underwent simultaneous laparoscopic adrenalectomy and laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery. The postoperative period was uncomplicated. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 4(th) postoperative day. We believe that the proposed way of trocar placement would help to avoid a 'rollover' problem between the laparoscope and a Satinsky clamp or a 'crossing swords' problem between a Satinsky clamp and manipulators.

Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes procedure as a treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction caused by fibroepithelial polyp.

Fibroepithelial polyps (FEPs) are rare benign ureteral neoplasms of mesodermal origin. As an intrinsic cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) they are very uncommon. Excretory urography and diuretic renography used by many urologists to diagnose a UPJO may not detect the ureteral polyp. We present a case of ureteropelvic junction obstruction caused by a fibroepithelial polyp, which was not diagnosed preoperatively. The patient underwent successful laparoscopic excision of the polyp with Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. We believe that laparoscopy is a useful, minimally invasive operative technique in the treatment of FEPs and may be considered a procedure of choice in large polyps, in which cases the endoscopic procedure is difficult or impossible to perform.

[The use of polymeric Hem-o-lock clips in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy]. / Zastosowanie polimerowych klipsów Hem-o-lock w laparoskopowej nefrektomii radykalnej.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness and cost-effectiveness of polymeric Hem-o-lock clips during laparoscopic nephrectomy. The intra- and postoperative complications of the operation were assessed too. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From April 2011 through November 2011, 19 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies were performed. A preferred method to secure the renal vein was the use of polymeric Hem-o-lock clips. The renal artery was clipped by titanium clips. In five patients an Endo-GIA stapler was used to secure the renal pedicle. All procedures were carried out using a transperitoneal access. The perioperative data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: No intraoperative complications associated with the use of Hem-o-lock clips were observed. The mean procedure time was 202 min. The average blood loss during the operation was 480 ml. No bleeding in the postoperative period was observed. The mean abdominal drain output was 65 ml per day. The mean time to drain removal was 3 days. The average hospital stay was 5-6 days. CONCLUSIONS: Using the polymeric Hem-o-lock clips is a safe, relatively easy and cheep way to close the renal vein during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

[The usefulness of the polymeric "double J" catheter in ureteropelvic junction stenting after laparoscopic pyeloplasty]. / Skutecznosc szynowania polaczeniamiedniczkowo-moczowodowego polimerowym cewnikiem "double J" u chorych poddanych laparoskopowej pyeloplastyce.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate both the effectiveness of ureteropelvic junction stenting with the use of a polymeric "double J" stent after laparoscopic pyeloplasty, as well as intra- and postoperative complications of the procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 2001 to November 2010 laparoscopic pyeloplasty was performer in 150 patients with primary UPJO. In all cases an attempt has been made to insert the stent into the operated kidney before the operation. All but one operations were performed using a transperitoneal approach. Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was carried out in 85 cases, Y-V plasty in 61 cases and Fenger plasty in 2 patients. Open conversion was performer in two cases. RESULTS: In 13 cases the complications observed in the postoperastive period were connected with the polymeric stent. In 12 patients the obstruction of the stent lead to massive urinary leakage and in 3 cases from this group urinoma developed. Urinoma was also observed in a patient, who was left without stenting because of the difficulties in inserting the stent to the operated kidney. In 10 cases the stent was successfully replaced but in 3 cases the placement of a percutaneous nephrostomy tube was necessary. It was left in place for 3 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate, that the stent obstruction is the main cause of postoperative complications in patients after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. So far no better method of upper urinary tract drainage after laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been worked out. Experimenting with various types of stents has been of no avail.