ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Prehospital estimation of injury severity is essential for prehospital therapy, deciding on the destination hospital and the associated emergency room care. The aim of this study was to compare prehospital estimates of the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) by emergency physicians with the values of AIS and ISS of injury severity determined at the conclusion of diagnostics. METHODS: In this prospective study, the ISS was determined prehospital by emergency physicians. The validated AIS and ISS were analyzed based on final diagnoses. A Bland-Altman plot was used in analyzing the agreement between two different assays as well as sensitivity and specificity were determined. Confidence intervals were calculated for a Wilson score. Significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: The prehospital ISS was estimated at 26.0 ± 13.0 and was 34.7 ± 16.3 (p < 0.001) after in-hospital validation. In addition, most of the AIS subgroups were significantly higher in the final calculation than preclinically estimated (p < 0.05). When analyzing subgroups of trauma patients (ISS < 16 vs. ISS ≥ 16), we were able to demonstrate a sensitivity of > 90% to identify a multiple-trauma patient. Diagnosing a higher injury severity group (ISS ≥ 25), sensitivity dropped to 61.1%. The Bland-Altman plot demonstrates that injury severity is underestimated in higher injury levels. CONCLUSION: Multiple-trauma patients can be identified using the ISS. Anatomic scores might be used for transport decisions; however, an accurate estimation of the injury severity should also be based on other criteria such as patient status, mechanism of injury, and other triage criteria.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services/standards , Injury Severity Score , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Triage/methods , Abbreviated Injury Scale , Adult , Air Ambulances , Correlation of Data , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and SpecificitySubject(s)
HIV Infections/complications , HIV/immunology , Hepatitis E virus/isolation & purification , Hepatitis E/complications , Adult , Aged , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Bilirubin/blood , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Female , Germany/epidemiology , HIV Infections/virology , Hepatitis E/epidemiology , Hepatitis E/immunology , Hepatitis E/virology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Viral Load/immunology , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI for detecting intracarpal lesions in clinical routine. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: In a retrospective study, we reviewed the charts of 506 patients who had undergone wrist arthroscopy in our department between May 1998 and November 2002. Out of 506 patients 217 had an MRI. The MRI was performed at 31 different radiology facilities using a number of techniques. The MRI results were compared with the arthroscopic findings, taking the arthroscopic results as a "gold standard" (sensitivity = SEN, specificity = SPE, positive predictive value = PPV, negative predictive value = NPV, accuracy = ACC). RESULTS: The following results were found: For tears of the scapholunate ligament the avalues are SEN 18.5 %, SPE 95 %, PPV 71 %, NPV 66 %, ACC66 %. Not one of 16 tears of the lunotriquetral ligament was found by MRI. CONCLUSION: In our data we found a low sensitivity for unspecific requested and implemented MRI for detecting intracarpal lesions. Therefore the indication for MRI should only be made after experienced hand surgeons have examined the wrist. In our opinion, only direct MR-arthrography is equal to arthroscopy, so that only an experienced radiologist who is familiar with this technique should perform the MRI diagnostics of the hand.
