Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Ind Med ; 44(3): 273-81, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12929147

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Participatory ergonomics (PE) are often applied for prevention of low back pain (LBP). In this pilot-study, a PE-program is applied to the disability management of workers sick listed due to LBP. METHODS: The process, implementation, satisfaction, and barriers for implementation concerning the PE-program were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively for 35 workers sick listed 2-6 weeks due to LBP and their ergonomists. RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-seventy ergonomic solutions were proposed to the employer. They were targeted more at work design and organization of work (58.9%) than at workplace and equipment design (38.9%). They were planned mostly on a short-term basis (74.8%). Almost half (48.9%) of the solutions for work adjustment were completely or partially implemented within 3 months after the first day of absenteeism. Most workers were satisfied about the PE-program (median score 7.8 on a 10-point scale) and reported a stimulating effect on return-to-work (66.7%). Main obstacles to implementation were technical or organizational difficulties (50.0%) and physical disabilities of the worker (44.8%). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that compliance, acceptance, and satisfaction related to the PE-program were good for all participants. Almost half of the proposed solutions were implemented.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics , Low Back Pain/prevention & control , Adult , Compliance , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Appl Ergon ; 32(5): 525-34, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11534798

ABSTRACT

Lifting, carrying, pushing and pulling at work are assumed to be related to increased risks of musculoskeletal injury, mainly in the low back and shoulder region. The implementation of products to reduce the physical load in heavy work is a well-known strategy to attack this problem. The success of these products depends not only on the product itself, but also on the process of product development and implementation. In this paper, seven cases are described where products have been developed to reduce the physical load on scaffolders, bricklayers, bricklayer's assistants, roofworkers, aircraft loaders, glaziers and assembly line workers. These products are described with special reference to the physical load problem in the occupational task, the process of product development, the nature of the product, the potential effects on physical load and the opinion of workers. From these cases, a list of key factors in product development contributing to the success of a product is composed. These concern among others a direct participation of workers, a wide analysis of risks, an analysis of potential negative side effects, and a systematic stepwise approach.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics/methods , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Stress, Physiological/prevention & control , Work/physiology , Workload , Equipment Design , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Occupations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...