Accidental decannulation following placement of a tracheostomy tube.

BACKGROUND: Accidental decannulation is a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality in patients in long-term acute care hospitals who require a tracheostomy tube. OBJECTIVE: To analyze features of accidental decannulation (AD) following placement of a tracheostomy tube, and to implement strategies to reduce the problem. METHODS: An analysis of data collected prospectively for quality management in a long-term acute care hospital was performed. RESULTS: AD occurred at a rate of 4.2 ± 0.9/1,000 tracheostomy days over a 7 month period. Factors associated with AD included mental status changes, increased secretions, and change of shift. Following the implementation of a series of interventions (staff education on risk factors for AD and best tracheostomy care practice; increased availability of telemetry and oximetry; and signage to identify patients at high risk of AD), the incidence of AD over a subsequent 7 month period was significantly reduced, to 2.7 ± 1.9/1,000 tracheostomy days. In addition the numbers of multiple, unmonitored, unreported, and night shift ADs were all significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted interventions can significantly reduce both the incidence of AD following tracheostomy and associated morbidity. Best practice guidelines to help minimize AD in patients with tracheostomy tubes are proposed.

Does the outcome of colonic flexure cancers differ from the other colonic sites?

BACKGROUND: Anecdotally, colonic flexure cancers (FC) appear to have a poorer prognosis compared to other colonic cancers (OCC). The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of colonic flexure cancers compared to the cancers of the rest of the colon. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of colonic cancer over a 5-year period (2002-2006) were retrieved from a prospective database. Analysis was performed on flexure (hepatic/splenic) cancers versus remaining colon cancers. Overall, 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were calculated. All patients were followed up until death or end of study period (December 2008), with median follow-up of 32 months. Statistical analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier with log rank statistic and Pearson chi-square test. RESULTS: Of 613 patients (54% males) with colonic cancers with median age 71 years, range (30-100), 67 (10.9%) were FC (35 hepatic/32 splenic) and 546 (89.1%) were arising from OCC. The curative resection rates were FC 73.2% (41 of 56) and OCC 83.4% (359 of 435) (p = 0.05). Post-operative mortality for FC and OCC was 10.7% (6 of 56) and 4.2% (18 of 434), respectively (p = 0.04). FC presented at a more advanced Dukes stage (p = 0.003). Recurrence rates were 9.8% (4 of 41) for FC and 20.9% (75 of 359) for OCC sites (p = 0.088). The overall mean survival was 48.8 and 58.2 m for FC and OCC, respectively (p = 0.158). Of 1-, 3- and 5-year survival, only 1-year survival was significantly different between the two groups (OCC (85%) vs FC (75%), p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one in ten colonic cancers is located at a flexure. Despite FC presenting at an advanced stage, leading to a lower curative resection rate, no significant survival difference was noted compared to other colonic sites, beyond the first year.

Psychological impact of colostomy pouch change and disposal.

This article presents some of the findings from a multicentre cross-sectional correlational study to evaluate the relationship between colostomy pouch change and disposal practices and the patient's psychological wellbeing. Five questionnaires were used in a one-off interview with 86 patients. Patients were assessed at between one and four months postoperatively. Results from the Pouch Change and Disposal questionnaire showed that only 25% of patients found disposal of used appliances the most difficult part of their pouch change and disposal routine. Half felt that their body was out of their control and 33% reported avoiding social and leisure activities due to what was involved in their pouch change and disposal routine. Patients cited several factors, such as minimizing odour and having an appliance that could flush away, as factors which would help them to stop avoiding these activities. Stoma care nurses have a unique opportunity to improve the psychological wellbeing of their patients by considering the aspects of pouch change and disposal that pose the greatest challenge to individuals. Use of a modified version of the Pouch Change and Disposal questionnaire may be a useful tool in identifying those at risk of impaired quality of life.