Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Heart Lung ; 50(5): 579-586, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34077826

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent interest in the 'weekend effect' has been expanded to cardiovascular intensive care units, yet the impact of off-hours admission on mortality and cardiovascular ICU (CICU) length of stay remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: We examine the association between CICU admission day and time with mortality. Additionally, length-of-stay was also evaluated in relation to admission time. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted including 10,638 adult patients admitted to a CICU in a tertiary-care academic medical center from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2019. ICU mortality and length-of-stay were assessed by admission day and time adjusting for comorbid conditions and other clinical variables. We used logistic regression models to evaluate the factors associated with mortality and a generalized linear model (GLM) with log link function and gamma distribution was used to evaluate the factors associated with ICU length of stay. RESULTS: Compared to weekday-day admissions, we observed an increased mortality for weekend-day for all admissions (6.5 vs 9.6%, Adjusted OR: 1.32 (1.03-1.72)), and for medical CICU admissions (7.6 vs 9.9%, Adjusted OR: 1.35 (1.02-1.79)). Additionally, compared to weekday-day, weekday-night admission was associated with 7% longer ICU length of stay in surgical ICU patients, 7% shorter length of stay in medical ICU patients. CONCLUSION: Admission to this open-model CICU during weekend hours (Saturday 08:00-Sunday 17:59) versus nights or weekdays is associated with increased mortality. ICU staffing care models should not significantly change based on the day of the week.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Intensive Care Units , Adult , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
2.
J Intensive Care Med ; 36(8): 857-861, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32519573

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To subjectively identify low-risk ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and triage this low-risk population to an intermediate level of care. BACKGROUND: Many patients with STEMI are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), however, a large portion do not merit ICU admission. We sought to examine whether, among post-STEMI patients admitted to the ICU, if an easily obtainable subjective scoring system could predict low-risk patients and safely triage them to an intermediate level of care. METHODS: Retrospective observational study at Christiana Hospital, a 900-bed regional referral center. Data were defined by the ACTION Registry and CathPCI Registry. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) predictions were retrieved for all patients with STEMI and were analyzed for complications, length of stay, and inhospital mortality. We then examined subjective criteria to triage patients with STEMI out of the ICU. RESULTS: Among 253 patients with STEMI, 179 (70.75%) were classified as low risk (intermediate level care appropriate) and 74 (29.25%) were classified as high risk (ICU appropriate). The mean age was 64.95 years. The APACHE III score was right skewed with a mean of 36.97 and a median of 31. There was a significant difference between the APACHE III score of low-risk patients and the APACHE III score of high-risk patients (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, patients characterized as low risk, as defined by our criteria, had low APACHE III scores and a low likelihood of complications post-STEMI. This low-risk population could potentially be admitted to an intermediate level of care, avoiding the ICU altogether.


Subject(s)
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , APACHE , Aged , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Length of Stay , Middle Aged , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Triage
4.
J Intensive Care ; 5: 60, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29075499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly occurs in cardiac surgery patients. Studies suggest inflammation and oxidative stress contribute to postoperative AF development in this patient population. Metformin exerts an anti-inflammatory effect that reduces oxidative stress and thus may play a role in preventing postoperative AF. METHODS: We conducted a matched, retrospective cohort study of diabetic patients' age ≥18 undergoing a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and/or cardiac valve surgery from January 1, 2009, to November 30, 2014. We extracted data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Primary exposure was ongoing metformin use at a dose of ≥ 500 mg in effect before cardiac surgery as captured before admission. Primary study outcome was postoperative AF incidence. Matching was used to reduce selection bias between metformin and non-metformin groups. Comparison between the groups after matching was accomplished using the McNemar test or paired t test. RESULTS: Out of the 4177 patients with cardiac surgery (CABG and/or valve surgery), 1283 patients met our study criteria. These patients were grouped into metformin [n = 635 (49.5%)] and non-metformin [n = 648 (50.5%)] users. Pre-matching, postoperative AF was found in 149 (23.5%) patients in the metformin group and 172 (26.5%) in the non-metformin group (p = 0.2088). Matching resulted in a total of 114 patients in each group (metformin vs. non-metformin). We found no statistically significant difference for postoperative AF between the two groups after matching (p = 0.8964). CONCLUSIONS: Prior use of metformin therapy in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery was not associated with decreased rate of postoperative AF.

5.
Crit Care Med ; 30(6): 1187-90, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12072666

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Acute abdominal complication in the medical intensive care unit may be underdiagnosed and can add significant risk of death. We hypothesize that delays in surgery because of atypical presentation, such as the absence of peritoneal signs, may contribute to mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (1995-2000). SETTING: Medical intensive care unit in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Medical intensive care unit patients with clinical, surgical, or autopsy diagnosis of acute abdominal catastrophe (gangrenous or perforated viscus). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (1.3%) met inclusion criteria. Ischemic bowel was the most common diagnosis, followed by perforated ulcer, bowel obstruction, and cholecystitis. Actual mortality rate was higher than predicted by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores at the time of medical intensive care unit admission (63% vs. 31%). Twenty-six patients (34%) did not have surgery, and none of these survived. Fifty-one patients underwent surgery and 28 survived (56%). Delay in surgical evaluation (p <.01) and intervention (p <.03), APACHE III scores (p <.01), renal insufficiency (p <.01), and a diagnosis of ischemic bowel (p <.01) were associated with increased mortality rates. Surgical delay was more likely to occur in patients with altered mental state (p <.01), no peritoneal signs (p <.01), previous opioids (p <.03), antibiotics (p <.02), and mechanical ventilation (p <.02). CONCLUSION: Delays in surgical evaluation and intervention are critical contributors to mortality rate in patients who develop acute abdominal complications in a medical intensive care unit.


Subject(s)
Abdomen, Acute/mortality , Hospital Mortality , APACHE , Abdomen, Acute/classification , Abdomen, Acute/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...