Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 9(3): e90930, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24614539

ABSTRACT

Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis has been recognized by CDC as a category B select agent. Although substantial efforts have been made for development of vaccine molecules against the pathogen, significant hurdles still remain. With no licensed vaccines available and high relapse rate of the disease, there is a pressing need for development of alternate protection strategies. Antibody-mediated passive protection is promising in this regard and our primary interest was to unravel this frontier of specific mAbs against Burkholderia pseudomallei infections, as functional characterization of antibodies is a pre-requisite to demonstrate them as protective molecules. To achieve this, we designed our study on in vitro-based approach and assessed two mAbs, namely BURK24 and BURK37, reactive with outer membrane proteins and lipopolysaccharide of the pathogen respectively, for their ability to manifest inhibitory effects on the pathogenesis mechanisms of B. pseudomallei including biofilm formation, invasion and induction of apoptosis. The experiments were performed using B. pseudomallei standard strain NCTC 10274 and a clinical isolate, B. pseudomallei 621 recovered from a septicemia patient with diabetic ailment. The growth kinetic studies of the pathogen in presence of various concentrations of each individual mAb revealed their anti-bacterial properties. Minimal inhibitory concentration and minimal bactericidal concentration of both the mAbs were determined by using standards of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and experiments were performed using individual mAbs at their respective bacteriostatic concentration. As an outcome, both mAbs exhibited significant anti-Burkholderia pseudomallei properties. They limited the formation of biofilm by the bacterium and completely crippled its invasion into human alveolar adenocarcinoma epithelial cells. Also, the mAbs were appreciably successful in preventing the bacterium to induce apoptosis in A549 cells. The present study design revealed the protection attributes possessed by BURK24 and BURK37 that has to be further substantiated by additional in vivo studies.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Burkholderia pseudomallei/drug effects , Protective Agents/pharmacology , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Antibody Specificity/immunology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Biofilms/drug effects , Burkholderia pseudomallei/immunology , Cell Line , Cell Shape/drug effects , DNA Damage , Epitopes/immunology , Female , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Immunization , Kinetics , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Protein Binding , Time Factors
2.
World J Microbiol Biotechnol ; 29(12): 2379-88, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23793942

ABSTRACT

Immuno capture PCR (IPCR) is a technique capable of detecting the pathogens with high specificity and sensitivity. Rapid and accurate detection of Bacillus anthracis was achieved using anti-EA1 antibodies to capture the cells and two primer sets targeting the virulence factors of the pathogen i.e., protective antigen (pag) and capsule (cap) in an IPCR format. Monoclonal antibodies specific to B. anthracis were generated against extractable antigen 1 protein and used as capture antibody onto 96 well polystyrene plates. Following the binding of the pathogen, the DNA extraction was carried out in the well itself and further processed for PCR assay. We compared IPCR described here with conventional duplex PCR using the same primers and sandwich ELISA using the monoclonal antibodies developed in the present study. IPCR was capable of detecting as few as 10 and 100 cfu ml⁻¹ of bacterial cells and spores, respectively. IPCR was found to be 2-3 logs more sensitive than conventional duplex PCR and the sandwich ELISA. The effect of other bacteria and any organic materials on IPCR was also analyzed and found that this method was robust with little change in the sensitivity in the presence of interfering agents. Moreover, we could demonstrate a simple process of microwave treatment for spore disruption which otherwise are resistant to chemical treatments. Also, the IPCR could clearly distinguish the pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains of B. anthracis in the same assay. This can help in saving resources on unnecessary decontamination procedures during false alarms.


Subject(s)
Bacillus anthracis/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Bacillus anthracis/genetics , Bacillus anthracis/immunology , Bacterial Capsules/genetics , Bacterial Capsules/immunology , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Polymerase Chain Reaction/economics , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spores, Bacterial/genetics , Spores, Bacterial/immunology , Spores, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Virulence Factors/genetics , Virulence Factors/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...