Digital rectal examination for trauma: does every patient need one?

The digital rectal examination is widely accepted as an essential component in the initial assessment of trauma. However, no data have been published that justify its routine use in all seriously injured patients. The objective of this study was to determine what if any impact on subsequent treatment and management decisions the initial digital rectal examination had on injured patients arriving at our emergency department (ED). We conducted a prospective observational study of all injured patients arriving at a Level II trauma center over a period of 6 months. A digital rectal examination was performed on all patients during the secondary survey phase of their initial evaluation shortly after arrival to the ED. The results of the rectal examination were noted for each patient with particular attention placed on the presence or absence of gross blood, Hemoccult result, prostatic examination, rectal vault integrity, and rectal sphincter tone. In addition the patient's hemodynamic parameters while in the ED and the injuries that were sustained were noted, as was their final disposition. Four hundred twenty-three patients were admitted to the ED after sustaining serious injuries. The mean Injury Severity Score was 9.96. The prostatic examination was normal in more than 99 per cent of patients; no high-riding or nonpalpable prostate glands were noted. Twenty-two patients (5.2%) were Hemoccult positive, but in none of these cases did the presence of occult blood in the stool lead to a change in the initial management or diagnostic approach. Three patients (0.7%) with penetrating injuries to the perineal/pelvic area had gross blood on digital rectal examination that prompted operative exploration to rule out a lower gastrointestinal injury. All three had rectal injuries confirmed at surgery. Rectal sphincter tone was normal in 406 (96%) patients, weak in 17 (4%), and absent in none. The only patient in whom the sphincter tone influenced management was an individual complaining of complete paralysis after a blunt mechanism of injury. He had normal rectal sphincter tone and admitted to malingering shortly thereafter. Overall the rectal examination influenced therapeutic decision making in five cases (1.2%). The digital rectal examination is unlikely to affect initial management when applied indiscriminately to all seriously injured patients during the secondary survey. Patients in whom the rectal examination may have a higher probability of influencing management are those with penetrating injuries in proximity to the lower gastrointestinal tract, questionable spinal cord damage, and severe pelvic fractures with potential urethral disruption or open fractures in continuity with the rectal vault. The Hemoccult test does not add useful information and should be discontinued as part of the secondary survey of injured patients.

Alcohol and drug use in adult patients with musculoskeletal injuries.

This study reviewed trauma registry data for information on the prevalence of alcohol and drug use in adult patients with fractures and dislocations admitted to Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, from January 1992 to December 1994. Of the 1776 adult patients aged 18 years or older, 1126 (63%) were tested for blood alcohol concentration, and 873 (49%) had their urine screened for a panel of 58 drugs. Of the patients tested, 467 (41%) had positive blood alcohol concentrations, and 335 (30%) were legally intoxicated (blood alcohol concentration > or = 0.10%). Of the patients providing urine specimens, 191 (22%) had samples that were positive for one or more drugs. Overall, 9% of the patients tested were positive for both alcohol and drugs, and 54% were positive for either alcohol or drugs. The highest prevalence of alcohol use was in patients aged 21 to 33 years, and men were intoxicated more often than women. Alcohol use was more commonly associated with motor vehicle accidents, pedestrian or bicycle accidents, and gunshot wounds; intoxification was associated with a higher incidence of tibia fractures. The average injury severity score was higher, the duration of stay was longer, and total hospital charges were higher for the alcohol-positive group. Patients testing positive for alcohol or drugs were more likely to lack insurance coverage.

Are scene flights for penetrating trauma justified?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the medical efficacy of helicopter scene flights for patients with noncranial penetrating injuries. DESIGN: A retrospective review of 122 consecutive victims of noncranial penetrating injuries evacuated by helicopter from the scene of injury to a level I trauma center. There were no medical criteria for accepting or rejecting a request for a scene flight by any public safety agency or emergency medical service (EMS). Flights were dispatched if the weather permitted and if a helicopter was available. RESULTS: The majority of patients were critically wounded. Their average Revised Trauma Score was 10.6, and 15.6% of the patients died (19 of 122), including all 11 patients who required prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Helicopter transport from the scene did not hasten trauma center arrival for any of the 122 patients. Ninety-two of the first-responder EMS units (75.4%) were advanced life support units (ALS) with crews of paramedics. The remaining 30 (24.6%) first-responder EMS units were basic life support units (BLS) with crews of emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Six of 122 patients (4.9%) required medical interventions by the medical flight crews beyond the capabilities of the ground EMS personnel. Only 3 of the 92 patients (3.3%) treated by first-responding paramedics received medical interventions by the medical flight crews beyond those authorized for paramedics (one cricothyroidotomy and two needle thoracenteses). Two of the 30 patients (6.7%) treated by first-responding EMTs received medical interventions by the medical flight crews not authorized for the EMTs. The on-scene paramedics performed endotracheal intubation on 10 patients. However, because of subsequent clinical deterioration, the medical flight crews performed endotracheal intubations on nine additional patients. In addition, two patients intubated by the first-responding paramedics required reintubation by the medical flight crews. CONCLUSIONS: Scene flights in this metropolitan area for patients who suffered noncranial penetrating injuries demonstrated that these flights were not medically efficacious. This conclusion rests on the findings that arrival at a trauma center was not hastened by scene flights and that only 4.9% of patients required prehospital care by the medical flight crew beyond the capabilities of the first-responding EMS personnel (2.5 and 6.7% for ALS and BLS responders, respectively). Based on this experience, we believe that in metropolitan areas, scene flights for victims of noncranial penetrating injuries should be restricted to critically injured patients likely to require prehospital care by the medical flight crew that is beyond the capabilities of the first responders or when the scene flight is likely to significantly hasten the arrival of the injured patient to an appropriate trauma center.

The pocket laser pointer as a teaching tool in laparoscopic surgery.

The common pen-sized laser pointer can be used during laparoscopic procedures to indicate landmarks on the video screen and facilitate communication between surgeon and the assistants. We describe a simple and inexpensive technique that allows scrubbed members of the surgical team to use the laser pointer without the need to sterilize the instrument.