Real-Life Experience With Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in Turkey.

INTRODUCTION: Single-tablet regimens (STRs) can increase treatment success and even improve the quality of life of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients. In this study, we aim to analyze the real-life efficacy and tolerability data of people living with HIV (PLWH) initiated on or switched to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (BIC/FTC/TAF) as first-line treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed in HIV-1-positive patients who were initiated BIC/FTC/TAF in the HIV clinic between June 2020 and June 2022. Patients who received BIC/FTC/TAF for at least 12 months were included in this study. Virological suppression, laboratory parameters, side effects, and immunological response were analyzed at one, three, six, nine, and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients, 66 (56.9%) treatment-experienced and 50 (43.1%) naive, were evaluated within the scope of the study. In the naive patient group, baseline HIV-RNA, CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts, CD4/CD8 ratio, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values were significantly different in different follow-up months. The number of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels below 50 copies/mL was 55.9% in the first month, 73.7% in the third month, 90.2% in the sixth month, and 100% in the ninth and 12th months. CONCLUSION: In our real-life observational study, BIC/FTC/TAF treatment achieved rapid viral suppression, maintained viral suppression in virally suppressed patients, and was effective for immunological recovery in both treatment-experienced and naive HIV patients. No serious side effects were observed. Our study has proved the potential of BIC/FTC/TAF as an important option in the treatment of HIV patients.

Comparison of Immunological and Virological Recovery with Rapid, Early, and Late Start of Antiretroviral Treatment in Naive Plwh: Real-World Data.

Background: Rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces the transmission of HIV infection in the community. This study aimed to determine whether rapid ART initiation is effective compared to standard ART treatment in our country. Methods: Patients were grouped based on time to treatment initiation. HIV RNA levels, CD+4 T cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, and ART regimens were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits for 12 months. Results: There were 368-ART naive adults (treatment initiated at the time of HIV diagnosis; 143 on the first day, 48 on the second-seventh day, and 177 after the seventh day). Although virological suppression rates at 12th months were higher in all groups, over 90% on average, there were no statistically significant differences in HIV-1 RNA suppression rates, CD+4 T cell count, and CD4/CD8 ratio normalization in the studied months but in multivariate logistic regression analysis; showed a significant correlation between both virological and immunological response and those with CD4+ T <350 cells/mL at 12th month in total patients. Conclusion: Our findings support the broader application of recommendations for rapid ART initiation in HIV patients.

In a Real-Life Setting, Direct-Acting Antivirals to People Who Inject Drugs with Chronic Hepatitis C in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs (PWID) should be treated in order to eliminate hepatitis C virus in the world. The aim of this study was to compare direct-acting antivirals treatment of hepatitis C virus for PWID and non-PWID in a real-life setting. METHODS: We performed a prospective, non-randomized, observational multicenter cohort study in 37 centers. All patients treated with direct-acting antivirals between April 1, 2017, and February 28, 2019, were included. In total, 2713 patients were included in the study among which 250 were PWID and 2463 were non-PWID. Besides patient characteristics, treatment response, follow-up, and side effects of treatment were also analyzed. RESULTS: Genotype 1a and 3 were more prevalent in PWID-infected patients (20.4% vs 9.9% and 46.8% vs 5.3%). The number of naïve patients was higher in PWID (90.7% vs 60.0%), while the number of patients with cirrhosis was higher in non-PWID (14.1% vs 3.7%). The loss of follow-up was higher in PWID (29.6% vs 13.6%). There was no difference in the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment (98.3% vs 98.4%), but the end of treatment response was lower in PWID (96.2% vs 99.0%). In addition, the rate of treatment completion was lower in PWID (74% vs 94.4%). CONCLUSION: Direct-acting antivirals were safe and effective in PWID. Primary measures should be taken to prevent the loss of follow-up and poor adherence in PWID patients in order to achieve World Health Organization's objective of eliminating viral hepatitis.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct-Acting Antivirals in Elderly Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: A Nationwide Real-Life, Observational, Multicenter Study from Turkey.

BACKGROUND: The number and proportion of elderly patients living with chronic hepatitis C are expected to increase in the coming years. We aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral treatment in elderly and younger Turkish adults infected with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective study, 2629 eligible chronic hepatitis C patients treated with direct-acting antivirals between April 2017 and December 2019 from 37 Turkish referral centers were divided into 2 age groups: elderly (≥65 years) and younger adults (<65 years) and their safety was compared between 2 groups in evaluable population. Then, by matching the 2 age groups for demographics and pretreatment risk factors for a non-sustained virological response, a total of 1516 patients (758 in each group) and 1244 patients (622 in each group) from the modified evaluable population and per-protocol population were included in the efficacy analysis and the efficacy was compared between age groups. RESULTS: The sustained virological response in the chronic hepatitis C patients was not affected by the age and the presence of cirrhosis both in the modified evaluable population and per-protocol population (P = .879, P = .508 for modified evaluable population and P = .058, P = .788 for per-protocol population, respectively). The results of the per-protocol analysis revealed that male gender, patients who had a prior history of hepatocellular carcinoma, patients infected with non-genotype 1 hepatitis C virus, and patients treated with sofosbuvir+ribavirin had a significantly lower sustained virological response 12 rates (P < .001, P = .047, P = .013, and P = .025, respectively). CONCLUSION: Direct-acting antivirals can be safely used to treat Turkish elderly chronic hepatitis C patients with similar favorable efficacy and safety as that in younger adults.