ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several studies support the hypothesis that scabies is on the rise in Spain. There are also concerns about the possible development of resistance to treatment and an increase in atypical presentations. The aims of this study were to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with scabies seen by dermatologists in Spain, to identify the possible emergence of atypical forms of scabies, and to explore the frequency of treatment failures and associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of data collected prospectively in April and May 2023 using the CLINI-AEDVp platform created by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). RESULTS: Participating dermatologists from 31 hospitals in 15 of Spain's autonomous communities recorded 186 cases of active scabies (51% in women) during the study period. A diagnostic certainty level of A, B or C as per the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria was required for diagnosis. Overall, 92% of patients had typical scabies and 66% had already been treated with a scabicide for the current episode. Of the treated patients, only 36% had received and completed adequate treatment (including the simultaneous treatment of all household members) and 50% had not received clear written recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In a high proportion of the cases of scabies studied, the patient had already received treatment. In those cases, we observed several remediable shortcomings that could explain why some of these treatments had failed. Remedying these deficiencies should lead to better control of scabies and an improved assessment of the actual effectiveness of currently available scabicides.
Subject(s)
Scabies , Humans , Female , Scabies/drug therapy , Scabies/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Treatment Failure , Academies and InstitutesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Several studies support the hypothesis that scabies is on the rise in Spain. There are also concerns about the possible development of resistance to treatment and an increase in atypical presentations. The aims of this study were to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with scabies seen by dermatologists in Spain, to identify the possible emergence of atypical forms of scabies, and to explore the frequency of treatment failures and associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study of data collected prospectively in April and May 2023 using the CLINI-AEDVp platform created by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV). RESULTS: Participating dermatologists from 31 hospitals in 15 of Spain's autonomous communities recorded 186 cases of active scabies (51% in women) during the study period. A diagnostic certainty level of A, B or C as per the International Alliance for the Control of Scabies Consensus Criteria was required for diagnosis. Overall, 92% of patients had clinical features of classic scabies and 66% had already been treated with a scabicide for the current episode. Of the treated patients, only 36% had received and completed adequate treatment (including the simultaneous treatment of all household members) and 50% had not received clear written recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: In a high proportion of scabies cases, the patient has already received treatment. In those cases, we observe several remediable shortcomings that could explain why some of these treatments fail. Remedying these deficiencies should lead to better control of scabies and an improved assessment of the actual effectiveness of currently available scabicides.
Subject(s)
Scabies , Humans , Female , Scabies/diagnosis , Scabies/drug therapy , Scabies/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Treatment Failure , Academies and InstitutesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Methotrexate (MTX) is frequently used in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, however, there is limited data on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), psoriasis clinical outcomes and hepatic fibrosis in MTX-treated patients in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in MTX-treated patients in Spain regarding to HRQoL, psoriasis clinical data and risk of hepatic fibrosis. METHODS: Observational, non-interventional, cross-sectional, retrospective, multicentre study, performed in Spain in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients treated with MTX > 16 weeks prior to inclusion. RESULTS: Despite ongoing treatment, 17.1% of 457 evaluable patients reported moderate-to-extreme impact on HRQoL (DLQI > 5); 21.4% BSA > 5 and 35.2% moderate-to-severe pruritus (VAS ≥ 4). Persistent severe psoriasis (PASI ≥ 10 and/or DLQI ≥ 10) was observed in 10.7%. Hepatic steatosis was identified in 64.1% of patients (HSI ≥ 36) and 37.2% of the patients were at-risk of advanced fibrosis which was associated to the MTX treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified unmet needs in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients treated with MTX, revealing a significant proportion of sub-optimally controlled patients in terms of HRQoL and different domains of the disease. This study also found patients at-risk of advanced fibrosis, with evidence suggesting a correlation between longer exposures to MTX and higher risk of advanced fibrosis.
Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents , Psoriasis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/chemically induced , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: According to current guidelines, oral antihistamines are the first-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Up-dosing antihistamines to 4-fold the licensed dose is recommended if control is not achieved. Such indications are based mainly on expert opinion. Objectives: To critically review and analyze clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of higher-than-licensed dosage of second-generation oral antihistamines in the treatment of CSU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed following a sensitive search strategy. All articles published in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library between 1961 and October 2018 were examined. Publications with CSU patients prescribed secondgeneration antihistamines in monotherapy compared with placebo, licensed dosages, and/or higher dosages were included. Articles were evaluated by peer reviewers. Quality was evaluated using the Jadad and Oxford scores. RESULTS: We identified 337 articles, of which 14 were included in the final evaluation (fexofenadine, 6; cetirizine, 2; levocetirizine and desloratadine, 1; levocetirizine, 1; rupatadine, 2; ebastine, 1; and bilastine, 1). Only 5 studies were placebo-controlled. The number of patients included ranged from 20 to 439. The observation lapse was ≤16 weeks. High fexofenadine doses produced a significant dosedependent response and controlled urticaria in most patients. Cetirizine, levocetirizine, rupatadine, and bilastine were more effective in up-dosing. The most frequent adverse events were headache and drowsiness. CONCLUSION: The low quality and heterogeneity of the articles reviewed made it impossible to reach robust conclusions and reveal the need for large-scale randomized clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Chronic Urticaria/drug therapy , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/therapeutic use , Administration, Oral , Animals , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Dosage Calculations , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Humans , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: According to current guidelines, oral antihistamines are the first-line treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Up-dosing antihistamines to 4-fold the licensed dose is recommended if control is not achieved. Such indications are based mainly on expert opinion. Objectives: To critically review and analyze clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of higher-than-licensed dosage of second-generation oral antihistamines in the treatment of CSU. Material and Methods: A systematic literature review was performed following a sensitive search strategy. All articles published in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library between 1961 and October 2018 were examined. Publications with CSU patients prescribed secondgeneration antihistamines in monotherapy compared with placebo, licensed dosages, and/or higher dosages were included. Articles were evaluated by peer reviewers. Quality was evaluated using the Jadad and Oxford scores. Results: We identified 337 articles, of which 14 were included in the final evaluation (fexofenadine, 6; cetirizine, 2; levocetirizine and desloratadine, 1; levocetirizine, 1; rupatadine, 2; ebastine, 1; and bilastine, 1). Only 5 studies were placebo-controlled. The number of patients included ranged from 20 to 439. The observation lapse was ≤16 weeks. High fexofenadine doses produced a significant dosedependent response and controlled urticaria in most patients. Cetirizine, levocetirizine, rupatadine, and bilastine were more effective in up-dosing. The most frequent adverse events were headache and drowsiness. Conclusion: The low quality and heterogeneity of the articles reviewed made it impossible to reach robust conclusions and reveal the need for large-scale randomized clinical trials (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Urticaria/drug therapy , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Chronic Disease , Clinical Trials as Topic , Drug Dosage Calculations , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Pemphigoid, Bullous/diagnosis , Pemphigoid, Bullous/drug therapy , Groin/pathology , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Pemphigoid, Bullous/pathology , Skinfold Thickness , Erythema/pathology , Epidermis/pathology , Biopsy , Achondroplasia/pathology , Papilloma/pathology , Hyperkeratosis, Epidermolytic/pathology , Parakeratosis/pathology , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, DirectABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treatment of nail psoriasis remains a challenging and often disappointing situation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, adverse reactions and tolerability of treatment of nail psoriasis with PDL vs. Nd:YAG, in association with betametasona calcipotriol gel. METHODS: An open, prospective intrapatient left-to-right study was designed. The right hand of each patient received treatment with PDL and the left hand with Nd:YAG. Betamethasone calcipotriol gel was applied once a day during the first week after each laser session. A total of four sessions were administered. RESULTS: The clinical efficacy was evaluated according to the NAPSI score. All patients showed improvement in nail bed and nail matrix psoriasis. The global NAPSI mean declined in 15.46 (p < 0.000). There was neither statistical difference between the reduction in nail bed and matrix NAPSI nor in the treatment with PDL vs. Nd:YAG. The administration of Nd:YAG was more painful. No serious adverse effects were documented. Limitations. No random assignment and the small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PDL and Nd:YAG have proven to be an effective treatment for nail psoriasis with no serious adverse effect. No statistically significant difference was found between the two treatments
ANTECEDENTES: El tratamiento de la psoriasis ungueal es una situación de difícil manejo y a menudo decepcionante para el dermatólogo. OBJETIVO: Comparar la eficacia, las reacciones adversas y la tolerabilidad del tratamiento de la psoriasis ungueal con PDL vs. Nd: YAG en asociación con gel de betametasona calcipotriol. MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo abierto con control intrapaciente izquierda-derecha. La mano derecha de cada paciente recibió tratamiento con PDL y la mano izquierda con Nd: YAG. Se aplicó gel de betametasona calcipotriol una vez al día durante la primera semana después de cada sesión de láser en las 2 manos. Se administraron un total de 4 sesiones. RESULTADOS: La eficacia clínica se evaluó de acuerdo con la escala NAPSI. Todos los pacientes mostraron una mejoría en las lesiones del lecho y de la matriz ungueal. La media global del NAPSI disminuyó en 15,46 (p < 0,000). No hubo diferencia significativa entre la mejoría de las lesiones del lecho y la matriz ni en el tratamiento con el PDL vs. Nd: YAG. La administración de Nd: YAG fue más dolorosa. No se documentaron efectos adversos graves. Limitaciones. Falta de asignación aleatoria y muestra pequeña. CONCLUSIONES: PDL y Nd: YAG han demostrado ser tratamientos eficaces para la psoriasis ungueal sin documentarse efectos adversos graves. No se encontró diferencia estadística significativa entre los 2 tratamientos
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Onycholysis/complications , Onycholysis/drug therapy , Onycholysis/pathology , Laser Therapy/instrumentation , Laser Therapy/methods , Laser Therapy , Betamethasone/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Lasers, Solid-State , Hyperkeratosis, Epidermolytic/complications , Hyperkeratosis, Epidermolytic/drug therapy , Acitretin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treatment of nail psoriasis remains a challenging and often disappointing situation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, adverse reactions and tolerability of treatment of nail psoriasis with PDL vs. Nd:YAG, in association with betametasona calcipotriol gel. METHODS: An open, prospective intrapatient left-to-right study was designed. The right hand of each patient received treatment with PDL and the left hand with Nd:YAG. Betamethasone calcipotriol gel was applied once a day during the first week after each laser session. A total of four sessions were administered. RESULTS: The clinical efficacy was evaluated according to the NAPSI score. All patients showed improvement in nail bed and nail matrix psoriasis. The global NAPSI mean declined in 15.46 (p<0.000). There was neither statistical difference between the reduction in nail bed and matrix NAPSI nor in the treatment with PDL vs. Nd:YAG. The administration of Nd:YAG was more painful. No serious adverse effects were documented. LIMITATIONS: No random assignment and the small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PDL and Nd:YAG have proven to be an effective treatment for nail psoriasis with no serious adverse effect. No statistically significant difference was found between the two treatments.
