ABSTRACT
Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are rare congenital disorders characterized by episodes of disproportionate growth that can cause pain and severe bleeding, with microvascular proliferation (MVP) associated with these episodes. Hormonal influences can also worsen the symptoms in patients with AVM. Case presentation: This case report presents a female patient with congenital vascular malformations of the left hand since birth, whose symptoms worsened during puberty and pregnancy, ultimately leading to amputation of the left hand due to unbearable pain and loss of function. Pathologic analysis revealed substantial MVP activity within the tissues of the AVM, with an expression of receptors for estrogen, growth hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone in the vessels of the AVM, including MVP areas. Resected materials not related to pregnancy revealed chronic inflammation and fibrosis but hardly any MVP. Discussion and conclusion: These findings suggest a role for MVP in the progressive growth of AVM during pregnancy, with a potential role for hormonal influences. The case highlights the relationship between AVM symptoms and size during pregnancy and the pathological findings of MVP areas within the AVM with hormone receptor expression on proliferating vessels in resected materials.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Soft tissue vascular malformations are generally diagnosed clinically, according to the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) classification. Diagnostic histopathologic examination is rarely performed. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the validity of the current diagnostic workup without routinely performed diagnostic histopathology. METHODS: We retrospectively determined whether there were discrepancies between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses of patients with clinically diagnosed vascular malformations undergoing therapeutic surgical resections in our center (2000-2015). Beforehand, a pathologist revised the histopathologic diagnoses according to the ISSVA classification. RESULTS: Clinical and histopathologic diagnoses were discrepant in 57% of 142 cases. In these cases, the pathologist indicated the diagnosis was not at all a vascular malformation (n = 24; 17%), a completely different type of vascular malformation (n = 26; 18%), or a partially different type with regard to the combination of vessel-types involved (n = 31; 22%). Possible factors associated with the discrepancies were both clinician-related (eg, diagnostic uncertainty) and pathology-related (eg, lack of immunostaining). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis of a subgroup of patients undergoing surgery. CONCLUSION: The large discrepancy between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses raises doubt about the validity of the current diagnostic workup for vascular malformations. Clear clinical and histopathologic diagnostic criteria might be essential for a uniform diagnosis.
