Effectiveness of 'Tackle Your Tics', a brief, intensive group-based exposure therapy programme for children with tic disorders: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: This paper outlines the study protocol for the Dutch Tackle Your Tics study in youth with tic disorders. Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders are prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders, placing considerable burden on youth and their families. Behavioural treatment is the first-line, evidence-based intervention for tic disorders, but tic reduction and availability remain relatively low. Patient associations stress the need for more accessible high-quality treatments, also focusing on improving quality of life. Therefore, the brief, intensive group-based treatment Tackle Your Tics was developed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Tackle Your Tics is a 4-day intensive and comprehensive group-based intervention for children and adolescents (9-17 years) with Tourette syndrome or a chronic tic disorder. The programme encompasses exposure and response prevention treatment and additional supporting components (coping strategies, relaxation exercises and parent support). To study the effectiveness of Tackle Your Tics and identify predictors/moderators at baseline, a single-blinded randomised controlled trial (n=104) is conducted, comparing Tackle Your Tics (n=52) with a waiting list condition lasting 3 months (n=52). Assessments are performed at similar time points for both groups: at baseline, after 4 weeks, and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up, on tic severity, quality of life and other psychosocial variables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the medical ethical committee of the Amsterdam Medical Centre (METC nr NL66340.018.18, v3 June 2020). Findings will be presented on national and international conferences, peer-reviewed scientific journals, patient organisation meetings and public media. Patient representatives are fully integrated as part of the research team. If Tackle Your Tics proves to be effective, it can expand evidence-based treatment possibilities for children and adolescents with tic disorders. Identifying the psychosocial predictors/moderators for the effectiveness of this intervention can provide personalised treatment advice in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL8052.

Consequences of a selective approach toward pulmonary valve replacement in adult patients with tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the long-term results of a selective policy toward pulmonary valve replacement in adult patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and severe pulmonary regurgitation. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with tetralogy of Fallot were followed up from 15 +/- 3 years until 27 +/- 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had mild-to-moderate pulmonary regurgitation. No significant changes occurred in the follow-up period. Of 45 patients with severe pulmonary regurgitation and severe right ventricular dilatation, 28 (62%) remained free of symptoms and did not undergo pulmonary valve replacement. No changes in right ventricular size or exercise capacity were found. In 3 (11%) of 28 patients, QRS duration increased to more than 180 ms. Seventeen patients had symptoms and underwent pulmonary valve replacement: 9 (54%) of 17 patients improved clinically and echocardiographically, and QRS duration shortened postoperatively. Right ventricular dimensions did not regress despite pulmonary valve replacement in 8 patients. CONCLUSION: Refraining from pulmonary valve replacement in asymptomatic patients led to no measurable deterioration in 25 (89%) of 28 patients. Referring symptomatic patients for pulmonary valve replacement led to an improvement in 9 (53%) of 17 patients. In 11 (24%) of 45, a selective approach led to questionable or unsatisfactory results.