Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Am J Vet Res ; 60(11): 1352-6, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10566807

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sampling feces off the ground replicates prevalence estimates for specific pathogens obtained from fecal samples collected per rectum of adult cows, and to determine characteristics of feces on the ground (fecal pats) that are associated with subsequent identification of Campylobacter spp, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Giardia duodenalis. ANIMALS: A random sample of adult beef cattle from 25 herds located throughout California. PROCEDURE: 1,115 rectal and ground fecal samples were obtained. Samples were submitted for culture of Campylobacter spp and examined, using a direct fluorescent antibody assay, to detect C parvum oocysts and G duodenalis cysts. Characteristics of fecal pats, such as volume and consistency, were recorded. RESULTS: Prevalence of Campylobacter spp was 5.0% (20/401) for rectal fecal samples, which was significantly greater than prevalence determined for ground fecal samples (2/402; 0.5%). Most isolates were C jejuni subsp jejuni. Prevalence of C parvum was higher in rectal fecal samples (6/557; 1.1%) than in ground fecal samples (1/558; 0.2%), but this difference was not significant. Prevalence of G duodenalis did not differ for rectal (36/557; 6.5%) versus ground (26/558; 4.7%) fecal samples. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Evaluation of ground fecal samples may not accurately indicate the prevalence of Campylobacter spp or C parvum in cattle but may reflect prevalence of G duodenalis. Differences in prevalence estimates between the 2 methods suggest inactivation of pathogens in feces after cattle have defecated. Prevalence estimates generated by evaluation of ground fecal samples, however, may more accurately estimate environmental pathogen burden.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter/isolation & purification , Cryptosporidium parvum/isolation & purification , Feces/microbiology , Giardia/isolation & purification , Water Supply/standards , Animals , Bacterial Infections/transmission , Bacterial Infections/veterinary , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Rectum/microbiology , Reproducibility of Results
2.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 214(7): 1048-50, 1999 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10200802

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine percentage of false-positive test results for assays used by regulatory agencies to detect antibiotic residues in tissues. DESIGN: Prospective study. ANIMALS: 426 dairy cows. PROCEDURE: Dairy cows scheduled for culling that were identified as being unlikely to have antibiotic residues in tissues on the basis of strict inclusion criteria were used. A sample of kidney obtained from each cow at slaughter was tested on-site, using the swab test on premises (STOP; 97 samples) or the fast antibiotic screening test (FAST; 329 samples). Frozen samples (n = 1,278) of liver, muscle, and kidney were thawed and retested at a federal laboratory, using the same screening assays. Kidney and liver samples (n = 852) were also tested using the 7-plate bioassay confirmation test used for confirmation and identification of antibiotic residues. RESULTS: Results of screening assays performed onsite were negative. When frozen samples were retested, 20 (12 liver, 7 kidney, and 1 muscle) had positive FAST results, but none had positive STOP results. Of the samples tested with the 7-plate bioassay confirmation test, 4 liver samples had results indicating a tetracycline (n = 3) or an unidentified microbial inhibitor (1) as a residue. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Results suggest it is unlikely that regulatory action will be taken against producers sending untreated cattle to market. However, because results of the FAST and 7-plate bioassay confirmation test were positive when applied to frozen tissue, use of assays based on microbial inhibition may not be valid for confirmation of residues.


Subject(s)
Cattle/metabolism , Drug Residues/analysis , Animals , Cadaver , Dairying , False Positive Reactions , Female , Kidney/chemistry , Liver/chemistry , Muscles/chemistry , Prospective Studies
3.
Avian Dis ; 40(2): 278-84, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8790875

ABSTRACT

A pilot project for a meat turkey National Animal Health Monitoring System was undertaken in California in 1988-89 to explore data gathering techniques and to estimate the frequency, magnitude, and variability of management, flock health (including administration of pharmaceuticals for prevention and treatment of disease), and production variables in order to facilitate planning for future food animal monitoring systems. Enteritis, which occurred in over one-third of the flocks, and colibacillosis, which occurred in nearly one-quarter of flocks, were the most common diseases reported. Mycoplasma synoviae was reported in two flocks and Mycoplasma gallisepticum and Mycoplasma meleagridis each were reported in one flock. Total mortality rate in the sample flocks was 9.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.2%-9.8%). The tom-specific mortality rate was 10.9% (95% CI 9.8%-12.1%) and the hen-specific mortality rate was 6.6% (95% CI 5.7%-7.4%).


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control , Enteritis/veterinary , Meat-Packing Industry/standards , Meat/standards , Mycoplasma Infections/veterinary , Poultry Diseases , Turkeys , Animals , California , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Confidence Intervals , Enteritis/epidemiology , Female , Male , Mycoplasma Infections/epidemiology , Mycoplasma Infections/mortality , Pilot Projects
4.
Am J Vet Res ; 52(10): 1699-705, 1991 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1767993

ABSTRACT

Mass screening ELISA methods were developed for testing cattle serum for antibodies against 14 common livestock diseases simultaneously. The absorbance values were transformed to a %ELISA (spectrophotometric antibody end point) by a computer interfaced with a microplate reader. A histogram indicating a cutoff point and a report for the veterinarian also was generated. The computer program produced a print-out of the antibody profile for each animal tested, the antibody concentration against each disease, and a histogram (antibody profile) showing the prevalence of each disease in the herd. Serum samples were obtained from 1,953 cattle, including 880 dairy cattle from 10 herds and 1,073 beef cattle from 20 herds. These samples were obtained from June 1988 through June 1989. The highest antibody prevalence was against bluetongue virus. Of the 1,953 cattle tested, 1,223 (63%) were seropositive for bluetongue virus, including 502 (57%) of the dairy cattle and 721 (67%) beef cattle. Other antibody prevalences, in descending order, were: rotavirus (44%), Pasteurella spp (25%), Leptospira spp and Haemophilus spp (22%), Mycoplasma spp (18%), parainfluenza virus (17%), Campylobacter spp (16%), Anaplasma marginale (15%), bovine leukosis virus (13%), Brucella spp (8%), Mycobacterium paratuberculosis (8%), bovine viral diarrhea virus (3%), and infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus (3%). Major differences in antibody prevalence between dairy and beef cattle were that only 4% of the dairy cattle were seropositive for A marginale, compared with 25% of the beef cattle, and conversely, 29% of the dairy cattle were seropositive for bovine leukosis virus, compared with 1% of the beef cattle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Antibodies/blood , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Mass Screening/veterinary , Age Factors , Animals , Antigens , California/epidemiology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Prevalence , Seasons , Software
5.
Avian Dis ; 35(2): 403-7, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1854324

ABSTRACT

A survey was conducted to characterize domestic and exotic bird populations, estimate seroprevalence to selected disease agents, and describe health management practices on 62 premises containing "backyard" flocks located within one mile of 22 commercial California meat-turkey flocks participating in National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS). Chickens were present on 56 backyard premises and turkeys on seven. Antibodies were identified against Mycoplasma gallisepticum, M. synoviae, M. meleagridis, Salmonella pullorum, Newcastle disease virus, avian encephalomyelitis virus, Bordetella avium, hemorrhagic enteritis virus, infectious bronchitis virus, and infectious bursal disease virus in 367 blood samples from 32 backyard premises. Twenty-two owners of backyard premises said they restricted visitor contact with their birds, and two required visitors to wear rubber boots and use boot disinfectant. Owners of seven premises used biologics and/or pharmaceutics for disease prevention. One family member worked on a commercial turkey ranch, but no other contact between owners, relatives, or employees and commercial poultry was reported.


Subject(s)
Bird Diseases/prevention & control , Chickens , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Turkeys , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Bird Diseases/epidemiology , Birds , California/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Interviews as Topic , Poultry , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology
6.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 198(4): 554-8, 1991 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2019526

ABSTRACT

Data on costs associated with episodes of disease and disease prevention, including expenditures for veterinary services, were collected from 57 California beef cow-calf herds during 1988-1989 as part of the National Animal Health Monitoring System. Mean cost associated with episodes of disease was $33.90/cow-year, with $0.78 and $1.37/cow-year being spent for veterinary services and drugs, respectively. The highest cost for veterinary services related to episodes of disease were for dystocia, lameness, and ocular carcinoma. For disease prevention, mean expenditures for veterinary services were $1.67/cow-year, nearly all of which was spent on prevention of reproductive tract conditions. Preventive expenditures for veterinary services related to female infertility (pregnancy examination), vaccination against brucellosis and male infertility (breeding soundness examination) were $0.72, $0.39, and $0.22/cow-year, respectively. Many costs associated with episodes of disease and disease prevention were similar to those reported from Colorado National Animal Health Monitoring System beef herds.


Subject(s)
Agriculture/economics , Cattle Diseases/economics , Veterinary Medicine/economics , Animals , California , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Diarrhea/economics , Diarrhea/veterinary , Dystocia/economics , Dystocia/veterinary , Female , Infertility/economics , Infertility/veterinary , Pregnancy
7.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 196(12): 1945-9, 1990 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2365618

ABSTRACT

Twenty-nine California dairy herds were studied over a 12-month period from 1988 to 1989 as part of the National Animal Health Monitoring System. Monthly interviews administered to dairy producers were used to measure the costs of all health-related expenditures and disease incidence in these herds. Of the total $1,523,558 reported, $1,355,467 (89%) was attributed to cost of disease events and $168,091 (11%) to cost of disease prevention. Most (78%) of the cost of disease events was attributable to death and culling losses. Veterinary services accounted for only $54,099 (4%) of total costs, 64% of which was used for disease prevention, compared with 36% for disease treatment. Udder disease was the most costly category of diseases reported at an average of $49.85/head at risk annually, followed by reproductive problems at $38.05. Through the use of sampling strategies less biased than those used in other surveys, the National Animal Health Monitoring System is designed to provide statistically-valid estimates of disease incidence and costs across broad geographic areas, potentially benefiting all those interested in the economics of livestock diseases in the United States.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/economics , Animals , California , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Costs and Cost Analysis , Dairying/economics , Digestive System Diseases/economics , Digestive System Diseases/veterinary , Female , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/economics , Pregnancy Complications/veterinary , Puerperal Disorders/economics , Puerperal Disorders/veterinary , Respiratory Tract Diseases/economics , Respiratory Tract Diseases/veterinary
8.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 196(10): 1590-3, 1990 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2347750

ABSTRACT

Sixty cow-half herds of more than 50 cows each were randomly selected for a prevalence survey of bovine trichomoniasis in California. Herd size, as judged by the number of bulls, ranged from 1 to 210 bulls (median = 8; mean = 59 +/- 15.8). Preputial smegma was collected from 729 bulls (median = 6 bulls/herd) and cultured for Tritrichomonas foetus. Of 57 herds from which samples were collected, 9 (15.8%) had at least one infected bull. Of the 729 bulls from which samples were cultured, 30 (4.1%) were infected. Correcting for sensitivity of the diagnostic test yielded a prevalence of 5.0%. Infection rates for bulls greater than 3 years old and less than or equal to 3 years old were 6.7% and 2.0%, respectively (P less than 0.025). Median herd sizes were 14 bulls (range, 6 to 114) for infected herds and 7 (range, 1 to 210) for uninfected herds. These findings suggest that trichomoniasis is common in California beef herds. Because several bulls less than 4 years old were infected, we suggest that control measures stressing replacement of older bulls with younger ones should be combined with diagnostic procedures in those younger replacements, to ensure that they are not already infected.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Protozoan Infections, Animal , Age Factors , Animals , California/epidemiology , Cattle , Information Systems , Male , Prevalence , Protozoan Infections/epidemiology , Random Allocation , Smegma/parasitology , Tritrichomonas/isolation & purification
10.
Am J Vet Res ; 42(5): 884-7, 1981 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6266296

ABSTRACT

Heparinized blood and serum samples were obtained from 1,295 ruminants in herds or flocks with bluetongue virus (BTV) infection in 4 western states. Submissions were from herds or flocks with clinical bluetongue (BT), as well as from animals on premises with no history of BT disease. Insects, including Culicoides variipennis, were collected in areas enzootic for BT disease. Viral isolations were in 10-day-old embryonating chicken eggs that were then adapted to Vero cells for serotyping. Sera were tested from group-specific antibody to BTV by the micro agar gel precipitin (AGP) test. Viral isolations were from cattle (81), sheep (122), goats (9), antelope (2), and C varipennis (5). There were 7 isolates of serotype 120, 114 of serotype 11, 42 of serotype 13, and 56 of serotype 17. In herds or flocks from which BTV was isolated, 51% of cattle, 56% of sheep, 21% of goats, and 52% of antelope had AGP antibodies. Virus was isolated from 43% of the cattle and 23% of the sheep that had no demonstrable evidence of AGP antibodies. Viral isolations were seasonal, occurring from August until December. Approximately 30% of the herds or flocks from which virus was isolated had more than one serotype of virus causing infection.


Subject(s)
Artiodactyla/microbiology , Bluetongue/epidemiology , Animals , Antelopes/microbiology , Bluetongue/microbiology , Bluetongue virus/classification , Cattle/microbiology , Goats/microbiology , Serotyping , Sheep/microbiology
12.
Avian Dis ; 19(4): 666-78, 1975.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1200943

ABSTRACT

Data collected during the velogenic viscerotropic Newcastle disease (VVND) epidemic that occurred in southern California from 1971 to 1973 were analyzed to determine the methods of spread of the disease. Spread between chicken flocks was extensive and due mainly to the movement of live birds and mechanical transport of virus by man, especially by vaccination and poultry service crews. Spread to exotic birds was from contact with infected imported stock. Spread to other species was most probably through contact with infected chickens. Infection persisted in commercial chicken flocks because of intensive vaccination programs, heavy traffic and contact between layer operations, and the maintenance of multi-age flocks. These foci of infection probably led to spread of the disease to areas from which VVND had been eradicated several months before. There was no evidence of significant wind-borne spread of virus between flocks.


Subject(s)
Newcastle Disease/transmission , Air Microbiology , Animals , Birds , California , Chickens , Columbidae , Disease Vectors , Ducks , Feces/microbiology , Geese , Humans , Newcastle Disease/epidemiology , Turkeys , Wind
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...