Banff 2022 pancreas transplantation multidisciplinary report: Refinement of guidelines for T cell-mediated rejection, antibody-mediated rejection and islet pathology. Assessment of duodenal cuff biopsies and noninvasive diagnostic methods.

The Banff pancreas working schema for diagnosis and grading of rejection is widely used for treatment guidance and risk stratification in centers that perform pancreas allograft biopsies. Since the last update, various studies have provided additional insight regarding the application of the schema and enhanced our understanding of additional clinicopathologic entities. This update aims to clarify terminology and lesion description for T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated allograft rejections, in both active and chronic forms. In addition, morphologic and immunohistochemical tools are described to help distinguish rejection from nonrejection pathologies. For the first time, a clinicopathologic approach to islet pathology in the early and late posttransplant periods is discussed. This update also includes a discussion and recommendations on the utilization of endoscopic duodenal donor cuff biopsies as surrogates for pancreas biopsies in various clinical settings. Finally, an analysis and recommendations on the use of donor-derived cell-free DNA for monitoring pancreas graft recipients are provided. This multidisciplinary effort assesses the current role of pancreas allograft biopsies and offers practical guidelines that can be helpful to pancreas transplant practitioners as well as experienced pathologists and pathologists in training.

Tuberculosis treatment without rifampin in kidney/kidney-pancreas transplantation: A case series report.

BACKGROUND: The best approach to tuberculosis (TB) treatment in transplanted patients is still unknown. Current guidelines are based on evidence either extrapolated from other populations or observational. Rifampin-containing regimens have strong pharmacokinetic interactions with immunosuppressive regimens, with high rates of organ dysfunction and ∼20% mortality. This report describes the results obtained using non-rifampin-containing regimens to treat confirmed TB in adult patients with kidney/kidney-pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Retrospective data analysis from confirmed TB cases in adult kidney/kidney-pancreas transplant recipients (2006-2019), treated "de novo" with non-rifampin-containing regimens. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients had confirmed TB. Thirty patients were treated "de novo" with non-rifampin-containing regimens. These patients' mean age was 49.24 (±11.50) years. Induction immunosuppression was used in 22 patients. Maintenance immunosuppression was tacrolimus-mycophenolate-steroids in 13 (43%), sirolimus-mycophenolate-steroids in 6 (20%), and other immunosuppressive regimens in 11 (36%). Belatacept was used in four patients. TB localizations: pulmonary 43%; disseminated 23%; extrapulmonary 33%. Twenty-seven (90%) patients completed treatment with isoniazid, ethambutol, and levofloxacin (12 months, 23; 9 months, 3; 6 months, 1); 12 of these patients also received pyrazinamide for the first 2 months and were cured with functioning grafts. One patient (3%) lost the graft while on treatment. Two patients (7%) died while on TB treatment. Median (range) follow-up after completion of TB treatment was 32 (8-150) months. No TB relapses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results with non-rifampin-containing TB treatments in this case series were better (in terms of mortality and graft dysfunction) than those previously described with rifampin-containing regimens in transplanted patients.

International Survey of Clinical Monitoring Practices in Pancreas and Islet Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcomes of both pancreas and islet allotransplantation have been compromised by difficulties in the detection of early graft dysfunction at a time when a clinical intervention can prevent further deterioration and preserve allograft function. The lack of standardized strategies for monitoring pancreas and islet allograft function prompted an international survey established by an International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association/European Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association working group. METHODS: A global survey was administered to 24 pancreas and 18 islet programs using Redcap. The survey addressed protocolized and for-cause immunologic and metabolic monitoring strategies following pancreas and islet allotransplantation. All invited programs completed the survey. RESULTS: The survey identified that in both pancreas and islet allograft programs, protocolized clinical monitoring practices included assessing body weight, fasting glucose/C-peptide, hemoglobin A1c, and donor-specific antibody. Protocolized monitoring in islet transplant programs relied on the addition of mixed meal tolerance test, continuous glucose monitoring, and autoantibody titers. In the setting of either suspicion for rejection or serially increasing hemoglobin A1c/fasting glucose levels postpancreas transplant, Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography, autoantibody titers, and pancreas graft biopsy were identified as adjunctive strategies to protocolized monitoring studies. No additional assays were identified in the setting of serially increasing hemoglobin A1c levels postislet transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This international survey identifies common immunologic and metabolic monitoring strategies utilized for protocol and for cause following pancreas and islet transplantation. In the absence of any formal studies to assess the efficacy of immunologic and metabolic testing to detect early allograft dysfunction, it can serve as a guidance document for developing monitoring algorithms following beta-cell replacement.

Estado actual del trasplanterenopancreático / Current status of the kidney-pancreas transplant

RESUMEN El trasplante de páncreas es un tratamiento alternativo para la diabetes. Sus modalidades e indicaciones son: 1) trasplante de páncreas simultáneo con riñón para pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 1 o con nefropatía diabética en estadio terminalen tratamiento sustitutivo o próximo al mismo; 2) trasplante de páncreas después de riñón parapacientes condiabetes mellitustipo 1 con un trasplante renal funcionante; 3) trasplante de páncreas aislado parapacientes con diabetes mellitustipo 1 con hipoglucemias aperceptivas que requieren internaciones o rescate de terceros. Algunos pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 seleccionados pueden ser candidatos a trasplante de páncreas. La selección de donantes es muy importante, el donante ideal es fallecido por traumatismo craneoencefálico, menor de 45 años, con un peso entre 30 y 90 kg, con un IMC menor a 30kg/m2, hemodinámicamente estable y sin antecedentes de paro cardiorespiratorio ni hipotensión sostenida. Hay varias estrategias de derivación de la función endócrina (sistémica y portal) y exócrina (entérica o vesical), la más utilizada es la derivación sistémica y entérica. En el manejo perioperatorio se destacan estrategias para mantener una buena presión de perfusión tisular, un control estricto de glucemia, para prevenir la trombosis del injerto debe implementarse un plan de antiagregación y anticoagulación, todo lo anterior junto a una profilaxis antibiótica, antifúngica y antiviral. Los esquemas clásicos de inmunosupresión incluyen una inducción con esteroides y anticuerpos deplecionantes de linfocitos T y un mantenimiento con un triple esquema con esteroides, tacrolimus y micofenolato. La clasificación de Banffdistingue rechazos celulares y humorales. La base del tratamiento del rechazo celular incluye pulsos de esteroides y anticuerpos deplecionantes de linfocitos T, mientras que los rechazos humorales requieren de plasmaféresis e inmunoglobulina endovenosa. Las principales complicaciones postoperatorias son el sangrado, la pancreatitis, la trombosis del injerto y las fístulas anastomóticas. En cuanto a los resultados, el trasplante de páncreas presenta, a cinco años, una supervivencia del paciente del 90% y un 77% del injerto pancreático. Las modalidades de trasplante solitario presentan menor supervivencia alejada del injerto. En Argentina hay una actividad de trasplante de páncreas de entre 60 y 80 trasplantes anuales. La reglamentación del INCUCAIprevé la inscripción anticipada en lista de espera de pacientes con nefropatía terminal con depuración de creatinina menor a 30ml/min.

ABSTRACT Pancreas transplantation is an alternative treatment for diabetes. Its modalities and indications are the following: 1) simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation: type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy (in replacement treatment or close to it); 2) pancreas transplantation after kidney: type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with a functioning kidney transplant; 3) isolated pancreas transplantation: type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with unperceived hypoglycemia requiring hospitalization or rescue by third parties. Some of the screened type 2 diabetes mellitus patients may be pancreas transplantation candidates. Choosing a donor is very important: the ideal donor should be a deceased one who died due to intracranial injury, under 45 years of age, weighing between 30 and 90 kg, with a BMI below 30kg/m2, hemodynamically stable and having no history of cardiopulmonary arrest or sustained hypotension. There exist various strategies to divert the endocrine function (systemic and portal) and the exocrine function (vesical or enteric), systemic and enteric diversion being the most commonly used. Among the techniques which stand out during perioperative management, we could mention maintaining a good tissue perfusion, a strict glycemic control, an antiaggregation/anticoagulation plan to prevent graft thrombosis and antibiotic, antifungal and antiviral prophylactic treatment. Classic immunosuppression schemes consist of induction with T cell depleting steroids and antibodies and keeping a three-drug treatment including steroids, tacrolimus and mycophenolate. Banff classification draws a distinction between cellular and humoral rejection. The basis for cellular rejection treatment includes steroid-pulse therapy and T-cell depleting antibodies, while humoral rejection requires plasmapheresis and endovenous immunoglobulin. The main postoperative complications are bleeding, pancreatitis, graft thrombosis and anastomosis fistula. As for the results, the survival rate 5 years after pancreas transplantation is 90% for patients and 77% for pancreatic grafts. Isolated transplantation presents a lower long-term survival of the graft. In Argentina, between 60 and 80 pancreas transplants are performed every year. INCUCAI regulations provide for early registration on the waiting list for patients suffering from end-stage nephropathy with a creatinine clearance lower than 30 mL/min.

Anti-Hla donor-specific antibody monitoring in pancreas transplantation: Role of protocol biopsies.

In kidney transplantation, de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) correlate with poor graft survival, and Consensus Guidelines recommend a protocol biopsy. In pancreas transplantation, DSA are also associated with poor graft outcomes; however, there are no recommendations on protocol biopsies. We started an antibody screening protocol on pancreas transplant patients at 0, 3, 6, 12 months, and yearly. Patients with DSA or high MFI non-DSA were considered for protocol biopsies of both organs. Results: 143 pancreas recipients were screened. 84 patients had negative antibodies throughout the study, 11 patients were found to have antibodies at graft dysfunction, and 48 patients had positive antibodies at screening without acute organ dysfunction (study group). Among the 30 non-DSA patients, 9 had protocol simultaneous pancreas and kidney biopsies performed with negative results in all of them. In contrast, among the 18 DSA patients, 15 had these biopsies performed, and 47% presented with subclinical rejection of the kidney, the pancreas, or both. In addition, some of the DSA patients without a protocol biopsy presented with rejection during the first 15 months of follow-up. Conclusion: We conclude that protocol biopsies of both grafts may play a role in the follow-up of pancreas transplant patients with de novo DSA appearance.

Graft dysfunction in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK): Results of concurrent kidney and pancreas allograft biopsies.

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplants offer significant therapeutic advantages but present a diagnostic approach dilemma in the diagnosis of rejection. Because both organs are from the same donor, the kidney has been treated traditionally as the "sentinel" organ to biopsy, presumably representing the status of both allografts. Truly concurrent biopsy studies, however, are needed to confirm this hypothesis. We examined 101 concurrent biopsies from 70 patients with dysfunction in either or both organs. Results showed concurrent rejection in 23 of 57 (40%) of cases with rejection; 19 of 57 (33.5%) and 15 of 57 (26.5%) showed kidney or pancreas only rejection, respectively. The degree and type of rejection differed in the majority (13 of 23, 56.5%) of cases with concurrent rejection, with the pancreas more often showing higher rejection grade. Taking into account pancreas dysfunction, a positive kidney biopsy should correctly predict pancreas rejection in 86% of the instances. However, the lack of complete concordance between the 2 organs, the discrepancies in grade and type of rejection, and the tendency for higher rejection grades in concurrent or pancreas only rejections, all support the rationale for pancreas biopsies. The latter provide additional data on the overall status of the organ, as well as information on nonrejection-related pathologies.

Trasplante simultáneo de riñón y páncreas exitoso en paciente con lipodistrofia parcial congénita / Successfull Simultaneous Pancreas Kidney transplantation in a patient with congenital partial lipodystrophy

No disponible

α-Lipoic Acid Protects Against Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Simultaneous Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Multiple factors have been implicated in the process of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in organ transplantation. Among these factors, oxidative damage seems to initiate the injury. α-lipoic acid (ALA) is a potent antioxidant that is used in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of ALA in patients undergoing simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant by evaluating the functional recovery of the graft and biochemical markers of IRI. METHODS: Twenty-six patients were included in the following groups: (i) untreated control; (ii) donor and recipient (DR) ALA-treated, in which ALA was administered both to the deceased donor and to the recipients; and (iii) recipient ALA-treated group. The expression of inflammatory genes, as observed in biopsies taken at the end of surgery, as well as the serum cytokines, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, regenerating islet-derived protein 3ß/pancreatitis-associated protein, amylase, lipase, glucose, and creatinine levels were quantified as markers of organ function. RESULTS: The DR group showed high levels of TGFß and low levels of C3 and TNFα in the kidneys, whereas high levels of C3 and heme oxygenase were identified in pancreas biopsies. Decreases in serum IL-8, IL-6, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor, and regenerating islet-derived protein 3 ß/pancreatitis-associated protein were observed after surgery in the DR group. Serum lipase and amylase were lower in the DR group than in the control and recipient groups. Early kidney dysfunction and clinical pancreatitis were higher in the control group than in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that ALA preconditioning is capable of reducing inflammatory markers while decreasing early kidney dysfunction and clinical posttransplant pancreatitis.

Common hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery: a rare anatomic variation identified on a cadaveric liver donor.

Anatomical variations of the arterial supply of the liver are not uncommon. The typical normal "textbook" anatomy of the hepatic artery is found only in approximately half of the cases. Some of the variations such as the presence of a right or left hepatic branch are more common, but other ones are extremely rare. We describe here a rare case in which the common hepatic artery arose from the left gastric artery, found during a cadaveric liver donor harvesting and confirmed with imaging studies. Cases like this one highlight the importance of knowing the hepatic arterial anatomy and the possibility of its numerous variations by the transplant and hepatobiliary surgeon.

Diagnóstico por tomografía axial computada del tumor sólido-papilar de páncreas / CT diagnosis of solid and papillary pancreas tumor

Antecedentes: El tumor sólido-papilar representa menos del 2 por ciento de todas las neoplasias pancreáticas y afecta predominantemente al sexo femenino durante la infancia y juventud. Se presenta característicamente en la tomografía axial computada (TAC) como un gran tumor, con áreas de densidad correspondiente a tejidos sólidos y líquidos en proporciones variables. Otros patrones tomográficos "no característicos" son poco conocidos y motivo de interpretaciones erróneas. Objetivo: Investigar la incidencia de los distintos patrones tomográficos del tumor sólido-papilar de páncreas. Lugar de aplicación: Hospital Público afiliado a la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Diseño: Estudio prospectivo en una serie consecutiva de pacientes. Población: 13 pacientes operados entre enero de 1988 y marzo de 2003 por tumor sólido-papilar. Método: Se analizaron las TAC de acuerdo a los valores densitométricos del tumor. Estos fueron clasificados en tres patrones: Sólido, Líquido y Mixto. Se definió como "sólido" a aquel que presenta áreas con valores densitométricos mayores a 50 Unidades Hounsfield (UH) y "líquido" con valores menores a 15 UH...

Diagnóstico por tomografía axial computada del tumor sólido-papilar de páncreas / CT diagnosis of solid and papillary pancreas tumor

Antecedentes: El tumor sólido-papilar representa menos del 2 por ciento de todas las neoplasias pancreáticas y afecta predominantemente al sexo femenino durante la infancia y juventud. Se presenta característicamente en la tomografía axial computada (TAC) como un gran tumor, con áreas de densidad correspondiente a tejidos sólidos y líquidos en proporciones variables. Otros patrones tomográficos "no característicos" son poco conocidos y motivo de interpretaciones erróneas. Objetivo: Investigar la incidencia de los distintos patrones tomográficos del tumor sólido-papilar de páncreas. Lugar de aplicación: Hospital Público afiliado a la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Diseño: Estudio prospectivo en una serie consecutiva de pacientes. Población: 13 pacientes operados entre enero de 1988 y marzo de 2003 por tumor sólido-papilar. Método: Se analizaron las TAC de acuerdo a los valores densitométricos del tumor. Estos fueron clasificados en tres patrones: Sólido, Líquido y Mixto. Se definió como "sólido" a aquel que presenta áreas con valores densitométricos mayores a 50 Unidades Hounsfield (UH) y "líquido" con valores menores a 15 UH...(AU)