ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of Tillaux-Chaput fractures. The results of our cases treated with mini-open surgery (open reduction and internal fixation) concerning efficacy and complications, we aim to compare other procedures (open, percutaneous, and arthroscopy-assisted) with the literature data and to look for an answer to the question of whether the primary treatment can be mini-open surgery. METHODS: Between the years 2014 and 2017, 22 of 30 patients with Tillaux-Chaput fractures were treated using mini-open surgery, open reduction and internal fixation with one cannulated screw. These cases were retrospectively examined concerning age, sex, side, surgery duration, complications, and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS). Functional results were statistically evaluated 12 months after the injury. Follow-up included a clinical examination, imaging and AOFAS. RESULTS: Of the patients, 14 were male (63.6%) and eight were female (36.4%). The mean age of the patients was 13.8 years. The mean surgery duration was 21 minutes. All fractures healed after an average of 14 weeks. No complications were observed in any of the cases. The mean follow-up time was 24.7 months. The mean preoperative AOFAS score was 53.3 and the mean postoperative AOFAS score was 93.6, which was a statistically significant difference. At the last follow-up, the AOFAS score was perfect for all cases. CONCLUSION: Contrary to what is stated in the literature, the mini-open surgical procedure has many advantages. The operation is very short and the risk of nerve injury is very low. This study showed that Tillaux-Chaput fractures could be safely and efficiently treated with mini-open surgery. We recommend mini-open surgery, complete anatomical reduction, and internal fixation for successful results.
Subject(s)
Open Fracture Reduction , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Leg/surgery , Male , Open Fracture Reduction/adverse effects , Open Fracture Reduction/methods , Open Fracture Reduction/statistics & numerical data , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We wished to present a case that had elbow posterolateral dislocation accompanying complete medial collateral ligament rupture(MCLR) and complete flexor group origo rupture (FGOR) without fracture. CASE REPORT: A30-year-old man came to emergency department after falling on the outstretched palm. After first physical examination and radiologic searches, elbow joint posterolateral dislocation was diagnosed. Together with sedoanalgesia, elbow dislocation was reduced, and instability evaluation by applying varus and valgus stress tests was performed. Positive valgus stress test and palpation sign which indicated soft tissue damage on the medial side of elbow were determined. Control roentgenograms showed no osseous pathology. By magnetic resonance imaging, elbow dislocation diagnosis accompanying MCLR and FGOR without fracture was confirmed. Using medial approach, ruptured MCL and elbow FGO repairing procedures were performed. CONCLUSION: The complications of elbow dislocation without fracture, which is barely seen, should be treated through appropriate treatment strategies after meticulous physical examination and radiologic evaluation. Hence, possible sequelae could be prevented or satisfactory results could be obtained.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of open Bankart repair versus those of modified Bristow operation in patients with recurrent anterior dislocations of the shoulder, the last of which was caused by a minor trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 38 patients (34 (89.5%) male and 4 (10.5%) female) who presented recurrent dislocation of the shoulders with capsular laxity and who underwent an open Bankart repair or a modified Bristow operation. The mean age of the patients was 29.6 years (range, 17-60 years). The mean follow-up period was 5.5 years (range, 35 months to 9 years). A total of 25 patients (65.8%) underwent an open Bankart repair, whereas 13 (34.2%) underwent a modified Bristow operation. The treatment results were assessed using the Rowe score for instability. RESULTS: Of the 38 shoulders assessed, 24 (63.1%) were right shoulders and 14 (36.9%) were left shoulders. Furthermore, 26 (68.4%) were the dominant shoulders of the patients, and 12 (31.6%) were the non-dominant shoulders. The mean time from the first dislocation was 3.8 years (range, 10 months to 11 years). The age at which the first shoulder dislocation occurred was 20 years or younger in 7 cases (18.4%), 21-30 years in 22 cases (57.9%), 31-40 years in 6 cases (15.8%) and 41 or older in 3 cases (7.9%). The patients had experienced 4-10 recurrent dislocations in 15 cases (39.5%), 10-20 recurrent dislocations in 10 cases (26.3%) and 20 or more recurrent dislocations in 13 cases (34.2%). The mean Rowe score was 85.6 following open Bankart repair and 81.9 following modified Bristow. No significant difference was observed between these good and excellent Rowe scores following the open Bankart repair and the modified Bristow operation (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Proper patient selection for the open Bankart repair and the modified Bristow operation is crucial. When the proper patients have been selected for these procedures, both produce satisfactory results for the treatment of patients with capsular laxities.
