Outcomes of Patients Hospitalized With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infective Endocarditis, Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis, and Native Valve Endocarditis: A Nationwide Study, 2003 to 2017.

Background Most published reports describing outcomes of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE) are single-center studies with small patient sample sizes. The goal of this study was to utilize population-based data to assess trends in CIED-IE hospitalization and to compare outcomes between patients hospitalized with CIED-IE, prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), and native valve endocarditis (NVE). Methods and Results A query of the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database between 2003 and 2017 identified 646 325 patients hospitalized with infective endocarditis in the United States of whom 585 974 (90%) had NVE, 27 257 (4.2%) had CIED-IE, and 26 111 (4%) had PVE. There was a 509% increase in CIED-IE hospitalizations in the United States from 2003 to 2017 (P trend<0.001). In-hospital mortality and length of stay associated with CIED-IE decreased during the study period from 15% and 20 days in 2003 to 9.7% and 19 days in 2017 (P trend=0.032 and 0.018, respectively). The in-hospital mortality rate was lower in patients hospitalized with CIED-IE (9.2%) than in patients with PVE (12%) and NVE (12%). Length of stay was longest in the CIED-IE group (17 compared with 14 days for both NVE and PVE). Hospital costs were highest for the CIED-IE group ($56 000 compared with $37 000 in NVE and $45 000 in PVE). Conclusions Despite the fact that the number of comorbidities per patient with CIED-IE increased during the study period, mortality rate and hospital length of stay decreased. The mortality rate was significantly lower for patients with CIED-IE than for patients with NVE and PVE. Patients with CIED-IE had the longest lengths of stay and highest hospital costs.

Distinct etiologies of high-sensitivity troponin T elevation predict different mortality risks for patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular events in the context of COVID-19 infection increase the risk of negative patient outcomes, but large cohort studies describing this association are limited. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the potential associations between cardiovascular events and mortality in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in 2450 patients hospitalized for confirmed COVID-19 infection within a single hospital network between March 15 and June 15, 2020. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality. RESULTS: In the study population, 57% of patients had elevated high sensitivity troponin (hs-TnT) levels. Acute heart failure occurred in 23% of patients and arrhythmias were observed in 8% of patients. Of the 1401 patients with elevated hs-TnT levels, a primary cardiac etiology (e.g., myocardial infarction) was identified in 653 (47%) patients. In the remaining 748 (53%) patients, there was evidence of a primary non-cardiac etiology for hs-TnT elevation such as renal failure (n = 304) and critical illness (n = 286). Elevated hs-TnT was associated with increased risk of mortality. A significantly higher mortality rate was observed for hs-TnT elevation associated with a primary cardiac etiology (OR 4.6, 95% CI: 2.7-7.6; P < 0.001) than a primary non-cardiac etiology (OR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.6-4.5; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated hs-TnT in the context of COVID-19 infection is associated with a significantly increased mortality risk. Hs-TnT elevation in the context of a primary cardiac etiology confers a nearly 2-fold higher mortality risk than hs-TnT elevation due to a primary non-cardiac etiology.

Incidence of carditis and predictors of pacemaker implantation in patients hospitalized with Lyme disease.

BACKGROUND: Lyme carditis, defined as direct infection of cardiac tissue by Borrelia bacteria, affects up to 10% of patients with Lyme disease. The most frequently reported clinical manifestation of Lyme carditis is cardiac conduction system disease. The goal of this study was to identify the incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients hospitalized with Lyme disease. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient sample was performed to identify patients hospitalized with Lyme disease in the US between 2003 and 2014. Patients with Lyme carditis were defined as those hospitalized with Lyme disease who also had cardiac conduction disease, acute myocarditis, or acute pericarditis. Patients who already had pacemaker implants at the time of hospitalization (N = 310) were excluded from the Lyme carditis subgroup. The primary study outcome was permanent pacemaker implantation. Secondary outcomes included temporary cardiac pacing, permanent pacemaker implant, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 96,140 patients hospitalized with Lyme disease during the study period, 10,465 (11%) presented with Lyme carditis. Cardiac conduction system disease was present in 9,729 (93%) of patients with Lyme carditis. Permanent pacemaker implantation was performed in 1,033 patients (1% of all Lyme hospitalizations and 11% of patients with Lyme carditis-associated conduction system disease). Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation included older age (OR: 1.06 per 1 year; 95% CI:1.05-1.07; P<0.001), complete heart block (OR: 21.5; 95% CI: 12.9-35.7; P<0.001), and sinoatrial node dysfunction (OR: 16.8; 95% CI: 8.7-32.6; P<0.001). In-hospital mortality rate was higher in patients with Lyme carditis (1.5%) than in patients without Lyme carditis (0.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 11% of patients hospitalized with Lyme disease present with carditis, primarily in the form of cardiac conduction system disease. In this 12-year study, 1% of all hospitalized patients and 11% of those with Lyme-associated cardiac conduction system disease underwent permanent pacemaker implantation.

MAUDE Database Analysis of Post-Approval Outcomes following Left Atrial Appendage Closure with the Watchman Device.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an important strategy to reduce stroke risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who are at high risk of bleeding on long-term anticoagulation. Real-world assessments of the safety of the Watchman LAAC device remain limited. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and timing of adverse events associated with Watchman LAAC device implants performed after FDA approval. Adverse events associated with Watchman LAAC implants performed between March 2015 and March 2019 were identified through a search of the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. During the study period, 3,652 unique adverse events were identified. An estimated 43,802 Watchman implants were performed in the United States during the study period. The overall adverse event rate was 7.3% and the mortality rate was 0.4%. Of the 159 unique types of adverse events identified, pericardial effusion was most common (1.4%). Most adverse events (73%) occurred intraoperatively (59%) or within 1 day of the procedure (15%). However, 19% of deaths, 24% of strokes and 27% of device embolizations occurred >1 month after implantation. The rates of most Watchman-related adverse events reported in the MAUDE database were comparable to those observed in clinical trials. A majority of adverse events occurred within 1 day of implant. In conclusion, while the absolute event rates were low, a significant proportion of device embolizations, strokes, and deaths occurred >1 month after Watchman implant.