ABSTRACT
AIM: The study objective was to compare intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes among patients who underwent hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (and single-port lararoscopy for presumed benign gynecologic disorders). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 40 patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy and 20 patients who underwent hysterectomy via natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Patients' age, body mass index, history of previous delivery and surgery, total operation time (from skin incision to closure), intraoperative and postoperative complications conversion to another surgical procedure, drop of hemoglobin level, postoperative pain at 1 and 18 h, average hospital stay, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery was superior to single-port hysterectomy concerning the length of hospitalization (p < 0.001) and visual analog scale at 1 h (p = 0.024) and 18 h (p < 0.001). In transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic group, postoperative complications were lower than single-port laparoscopy group (p = 0.023). In transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopy, group conversion to a standard vaginal hysterectomy occurred in two cases (10%). Four patients in the single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy group had umbilical herniation, three had port-site infections, and two patients had vaginal cuff hematoma. These patients required rehospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Despite hysterectomy via transvaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery has not yet found its place in routine practice in gynecology departments, it could be a prominent alternative approach to other minimally invasive surgical procedures in selected patients with many advantages including lesser pain and lower complication rates compared with single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Female , Humans , Hysterectomy/adverse effects , Hysterectomy, Vaginal , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Vagina/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: s: There is a need for markers to facilitate the diagnosis of preeclampsia, one of the most chief causes of maternal and infant mortality. Preeclampsia causes damage to the glomeruli and vascular endothelium in pregnant women. Podocalyxin is a sialoglycoprotein found in both glomeruli and vascular endothelium. In this study, we investigated the levels of podocalyxin in preeclampsia, and studied its potential to predict preeclampsia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Women admitted to the Health Sciences University Derince Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between February-November 2018 due to high direct blood and diagnosed with preeclampsia according to the 2013 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria were included in the study. The control group consisted of healthy volunteers having similar demographic features (gestational week, gravida, parity, and age) with the preeclampsia group. The main outcome variable was serum podocalyxin levels. RESULTS: The mean (± SD) podocalyxin levels of the study and control groups were 124.15 ± 39.63 ng/mL and 71.47 ± 16.86 ng/mL, respectively ( t = 7.845 , p < 0.001 ). Using a cut-off of 91.7123, podocalyxin could predict preeclampsia with 90% sensitivity and 98% specificity. Furthermore, podocalyxin levels were significantly higher than the normotensive participants in both early ( 14 3.81 ± 5 1.96 ng/mL vs. 75. 35 ± 1 9.36 ng/mL ) and late-onset ( 11 0.22 ± 1 9.11 ng/mL vs 68. 26 ± 1 4.13 ng/mL ) preeclampsia (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum podocalyxin levels increase in preeclampsia. We conclude that podocalyxin is a candidate for predicting preeclampsia.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a new development in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a new hybrid NOTES technique in gynecology which can be used for hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in patients with adnexal pathology and multiple operation histories. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 50-year-old woman with gravida 2 para 2 was referred to our clinic with left-sided abdominal pain. She had a history of two previous abdominal surgeries and a persistent ovarian cyst for 2 years. An ultrasound examination revealed a left complex hypoechoic ovarian cyst of 10 cm. Tumor markers were normal and the patient had no suspicion for malignancy. The hybrid NOTES technique assisted by an umbilical camera was planned due to the possibility of pelvic adhesions and her concerns about cosmesis. DISCUSSION: The major difference between NOTES and umbilical camera assisted NOTES is seeing all of the major structures, such as the ureters, uterine vessels, bowels, and pelvic adhesions, which can lead to complications during the surgery. In fact, hybrid NOTES can make surgeries more feasible. CONCLUSION: This new hybrid NOTES offers effective and safer surgical management in patients who have had previous surgery and adnexal masses.
