Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pharmacol Rep ; 71(3): 535-544, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31026757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a neoplastic disease with high morbidity and mortality in women worldwide. Breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) have a significant function in tumor growth, recurrence, and therapeutic resistance. Thus, CSCs have been pointed as targets of new therapies for breast cancer. Herein, we aimed to repurpose certain drugs as breast CSC-targeting agents. METHODS: We compared a consensus breast CSC signature with the transcriptomic changes that were induced by over 1300 bioactive compounds using Connectivity Map. The effects of the selected drugs on SOX2 promoter transactivation, SOX2 expression, viability, clonogenicity, and ALDH activity in breast cancer cells were analyzed by luciferase assay, western blot, MTT assay, mammosphere formation assay, and ALDEFLUOR® test, respectively. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed using the gene expression data from mammary tumors of mice that were treated with lovastatin. RESULTS: Five drugs (fasudil, pivmecillinam, ursolic acid, 16,16-dimethylprostaglandin E2, and lovastatin) induced signatures that correlated negatively with the query CSC signature. In vitro, lovastatin inhibited SOX2 promoter transactivation, and reduced the efficiency of mammosphere formation and the percentage of ALDH+ cells. Mevalonate mitigated the effects of lovastatin, suggesting that the targeting of CSCs by lovastatin was mediated by the inhibition of its reported target, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR). By GSEA, lovastatin downregulated genes that are involved in stemness and invasiveness in mammary tumors, corroborating our in vitro findings. CONCLUSION: Lovastatin is a breast CSC-targeting drug. The inhibition of HMGCR might develop new adjuvant therapeutic strategies for breast tumors.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Lovastatin/pharmacology , Neoplastic Stem Cells/drug effects , Transcriptome/drug effects , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Down-Regulation/genetics , Drug Delivery Systems/methods , Female , Humans , Mice , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Promoter Regions, Genetic/drug effects , Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics , SOXB1 Transcription Factors/genetics , Transcriptional Activation/drug effects , Transcriptional Activation/genetics , Transcriptome/genetics
2.
Curr Stem Cell Res Ther ; 14(5): 389-397, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30147014

ABSTRACT

Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) constitute a subpopulation at the top of the tumor cell hierarchy that contributes to tumor heterogeneity and is uniquely capable of seeding new tumors. Because of their biological properties, CSCs have been pointed out as therapeutic targets for the development of new therapies against breast cancer. The identification of drugs that selectively target breast CSCs requires a clear understanding of their biological functions and the experimental methods to evaluate such hallmarks. Herein, we review the methods to study breast CSCs properties and discuss their value in the preclinical evaluation of CSC-targeting drugs.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplastic Stem Cells/drug effects , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Female , Humans
3.
J Vis Exp ; (123)2017 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28518088

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are relevant to the treatment of different pathologies, including cancers. The development of biosimilar mAbs by pharmaceutical companies is a market opportunity, but it is also a strategy to increase drug accessibility and reduce therapy-associated costs. The protocols detailed here describe the evaluation of target binding and CDC induction by rituximab in Daudi cells. These two functions require different structural regions of the antibody and are relevant to the clinical effect induced by rituximab. The protocols allow the side-to-side comparison of a reference rituximab and a marketed rituximab biosimilar. The evaluated products showed differences both in target binding and CDC induction, suggesting that there are underlying physicochemical differences and highlighting the need to analyze the impact of those differences in the clinical setting. The methods reported here constitute simple and inexpensive in vitro models for the evaluation of the activity of rituximab biosimilars. Thus, they can be useful during biosimilar development, as well as for quality control in biosimilar production. Furthermore, the presented methods can be extrapolated to other therapeutic mAbs.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD20/drug effects , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/pharmacology , Burkitt Lymphoma/drug therapy , Cytotoxicity Tests, Immunologic/methods , Rituximab/pharmacology , Antigens, CD20/immunology , Antigens, CD20/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/immunology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Burkitt Lymphoma/immunology , Burkitt Lymphoma/metabolism , Cell Line , Cytotoxicity, Immunologic , Humans , Male , Rituximab/immunology , Rituximab/metabolism , Rituximab/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...