Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 28
Filter
1.
Crit Care Sci ; 36: e20240176en, 2024.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597483

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effect of the prone position on endotracheal intubation and mortality in nonintubated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: We registered the protocol (CRD42021286711) and searched for four databases and gray literature from inception to December 31, 2022. We included observational studies and clinical trials. There was no limit by date or the language of publication. We excluded case reports, case series, studies not available in full text, and those studies that included children < 18-years-old. RESULTS: We included ten observational studies, eight clinical trials, 3,969 patients, 1,120 endotracheal intubation events, and 843 deaths. All of the studies had a low risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Risk of Bias 2 tools). We found that the conscious prone position decreased the odds of endotracheal intubation by 44% (OR 0.56; 95%CI 0.40 - 0.78) and mortality by 43% (OR 0.57; 95%CI 0.39 - 0.84) in nonintubated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. This protective effect on endotracheal intubation and mortality was more robust in those who spent > 8 hours/day in the conscious prone position (OR 0.43; 95%CI 0.26 - 0.72 and OR 0.38; 95%CI 0.24 - 0.60, respectively). The certainty of the evidence according to the GRADE criteria was moderate. CONCLUSION: The conscious prone position decreased the odds of endotracheal intubation and mortality, especially when patients spent over 8 hours/day in the conscious prone position and treatment in the intensive care unit. However, our results should be cautiously interpreted due to limitations in evaluating randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized clinical trials and observational studies. However, despite systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, we must keep in mind that these studies remain heterogeneous from a clinical and methodological point of view.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , Intensive Care Units , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Prone Position , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy
2.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1362318, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38495112

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) patients on mechanical ventilation often lack standardized guidelines for optimal ventilatory support. This study reviews existing literature to compare outcomes between high tidal volume (HTV) and low tidal volume (LTV) strategies in this unique patient population. Methods: We searched for studies published up to August 30, 2023, in five databases, following a PECO/PICO strategy. We found six studies for quantitative analysis and meta-analyzed five studies. Results: This meta-analysis included 396 patients with CSCI and mechanical ventilation (MV), 119 patients treated with high tidal volume (HTV), and 277 with low tidal volume (LTV). This first meta-analysis incorporates the few studies that show contradictory findings. Our meta-analysis shows that there is no significant statistical difference in developing VAP between both comparison groups (HTV vs. LTV) (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.66; p > 0.05; I2: 0%), nor are there differences between the presence of other pulmonary complications when treating with HTV such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), atelectasis, onset of weaning. Conclusion: In patients with CSCI in MV, the use of HTV does not carry a greater risk of pneumonia compared to LTV; in turn, it is shown as a safe ventilatory strategy as it does not establish an increase in other pulmonary complications such as ARDS, atelectasis, the onset of weaning nor others associated with volutrauma. It is necessary to evaluate the role of HTV ventilation in this group of patients in primary RCT-type studies.

3.
Front Pharmacol ; 15: 1298919, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38303987

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Recent studies suggest that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) could reduce the risk of active tuberculosis and improve clinical outcomes. We aimed to synthesize the evidence regarding the effect of CCBs on the risk of developing active tuberculosis and mortality. Methods: We systematically searched for observational studies and clinical trials published in six databases until 31 August 2023, following a PECO/PICO strategy. Results: We included eight observational studies, 4,020,830 patients, among whom 241,761 had diabetes mellitus and 30,397 had active tuberculosis. According to our results, CCBs reduce the risk of developing active tuberculosis by 29% (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.67-0.75) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. However, CCBs do not show any benefit in terms of tuberculosis-related mortality (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.98-1.02). For both outcomes, no statistical heterogeneity was found (I2 = 0, p > 0.10). This protective effect of CCBs on the risk of active tuberculosis remained independent of the type of patient (with diabetes mellitus vs. general population) or the class of CCB administered (DHP-CCB vs. non-DHP-CCB) (test for subgroup differences I2 = 0, p > 0.10). However, this beneficial effect was more significant among the general population (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.66-0.74) compared to patients with diabetes mellitus (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.61-0.86) and among those patients treated with DHP-CCBs (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.63-0.74) compared to patients treated with non-DHP-CCBs (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.67-0.78). Conclusion: CCBs may reduce the risk of active TB in patients with diabetes and the general population. On the contrary, CCBs do not seem to have a protective effect on tuberculosis-related mortality. However, more evidence is still needed. We recommend developing clinical trials to verify these findings, including more diverse populations. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=352129].

5.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 40(6): 626-633, dic. 2023. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1529992

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: La mortalidad por pacientes por COVID-19 grave que desarrollaban neumonía grave y síndrome de dificultad respiratoria agudo (SDRA) grave ha sido significativa a pesar del tratamiento oportuno. Es importante determinar predictores tempranos de enfermedad que nos ayuden a estratificar aquellos pacientes con mayor riesgo de fallecer. Se pretende estudiar el comportamiento del puntaje APP (APPS) como predictor de ello, basados en algunos reportes de uso y utilidad en el SDRA. no COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Determinar si el APPS es útil como predictor de mortalidad en SDRA. por COVID-19 grave. PACIENTES Y MÉTODO: Se realizó un estudio tipo cohorte retrospectivo, incluyendo pacientes de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI), con SDRA. por COVID-19 grave, que ingresaron a la UCI del Hospital Regional Docente de Trujillo (HRDT) en el período abril 2020- abril 2021. Se evalúo la utilidad del APPS como predictor de mortalidad em dicha población. RESULTADOS: El APPS demostró ser un factor asociado a mortalidad en pacientes con SDRA. y COVID-19 grave (RPa 1,34; IC 95% 1,16 a 1,56; p < 0,001). Además, encontramos que, al realizar un modelo de predicción ajustado por edad, sexo, SOFA, APPS, shock, Indice de Charlson (ICh), se comportan como factores asociados a mortalidad el APPS, el sexo masculino (RPa: 1,48; IC 95% 1,09 a 2,049; p < 0,05) y el ICh (RPa: 1,11; IC 95% 1,02 a 1,21; p < 0,05). CONCLUSIÓN: El APPS, el sexo masculino y el ICh son predictores de mortalidad en SDRA. por COVID-19 grave.


BACKGROUND: Mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 who developed severe pneumonia and severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) has been significant despite timely treatment. It is important to determine early predictors of disease that help us to stratify those patients with a higher risk of death. It is intended to study the behavior of the APPS score as a predictor of this, based on some reports of use and usefulness in non-COVID-19 ARDS. AIM: To determine if the APP score is useful as a predictor of mortality in ARDS due to severe COVID-19. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was carried out, including patients from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with ARDS due to severe COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU of the Trujillo Regional Teaching Hospital (HRDT) in the period March 2020 to March 2021. The usefulness of the APP score as a predictor of mortality in mentioned population was evaluated. RESULTS: The APP score proved to be a factor associated with mortality in patients with ARDS and severe COVID-19 (APR 1.34; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.56; p < 0.001). We also found that when performing a prediction model adjusted for age, sex, SOFA, APP score, shock and Charlson Index (ICh) we found that the APP score, male sex (APR: 1.48; 95% CI 1.09 to 2.049; p < 0.05) and the ICh behave as factors associated with mortality (RPa: 1.11; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.21; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The APP score, male sex, and ICh are predictors of mortality in ARDS due to severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/mortality , COVID-19/complications , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , ROC Curve , Hospital Mortality , COVID-19/mortality , Intensive Care Units
6.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1295299, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38098842

ABSTRACT

Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) have a higher risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis than the general population. In HCWs, the risk of tuberculosis infection depends on the local tuberculosis prevalence, HCWs' characteristics, the healthcare facility, and prevention and control measures. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and risk factors for LTBI in HCWs at a northern Peruvian hospital. Methods: This study had two phases: (1) a cross-sectional phase involving recruitment, history taking, and sampling for the Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRA test), and (2) a prospective follow-up of IGRA-positive participants. We enrolled direct and non-direct patient caregivers among HCWs. We defined an LTBI case if the IGRA test was positive and clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations for active tuberculosis were negative. Results: We recruited 308 participants between November 2022 and May 2023. The mean age was 38.6 ± 8.3 years. Over 75% of the participants were female. The most common job category was technicians (30.5%), physicians (22.7%), nurses (20.5%), and other HCWs groups (17.5%). Most participants worked in hospital wards (28.2%), diagnostics departments (16.9%), and critical care departments (15.6%). The LTBI prevalence among HCWs was 17.86% (95% CI 13.84-22.70). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, time working in our hospital, and family history of tuberculosis, males had a higher risk of LTBI (aPR 1.69, 95% CI 1.01-2.77) than females. Working for more than 10 years increased the risk of LBTI (aPR 2.4, 95% CI 1.44-3.97) compared to working for ≤10 years. Even further, participants who had worked for more than 20 years had an aPR of 4.31 (95% CI 1.09-13.65) compared to those with ≤10 years. Similarly, occupational exposure increased the risk of LTBI (aPR 2.21, 95% CI 1.27-4.08) compared to those HCWs not occupationally exposed. Conclusion: The LTBI prevalence in HCWs at a northern Peruvian hospital was lower compared to other Peruvian cities. Males, more experienced, and occupational exposed HCWs are at higher risk of LTBI. LTBI prevalence in Peruvian HCWs is still high. More studies are needed to address some aspects this study has not examined.

7.
F1000Res ; 12: 724, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37981980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High altitude exposure triggers a series of physiological changes to maintain homeostasis. Although longer-term (days to years) acclimatization processes are well studied, less is known about the physiological changes upon rapid ascent. We took advantage of Peru's geography to measure the first physiological changes following rapid transport from a low to a high-altitude environment among lowlanders. METHODS: Blood glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and salivary cortisol among healthy lowland Peruvians were measured before and after glucose ingestion at 40 m and upon arrival at 3470 m. Resting heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and blood pressure were also monitored. RESULTS: At high altitude, we find a significant ( p<0.05) increase in heart rate and a decrease in blood oxygen saturation and salivary cortisol. Additionally, baseline levels of blood glucose, plasma C-peptide, and cortisol were reduced ( p<0.05). Blood glucose, plasma insulin, and plasma C-peptide returned to baseline or below faster at high altitude after glucose ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: Although many overlapping environmental and physiological factors are present in the high-altitude environment, the first steps of acclimatization in this population appear to be caused by increased energy expenditure and glucose metabolism to maintain oxygen homeostasis until the longer-term acclimatization mechanisms become more significant.


Subject(s)
Altitude , Blood Glucose , Humans , Peru , C-Peptide , Hydrocortisone , Glucose
8.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 10: 1248842, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37608829

ABSTRACT

Tuberculosis is a rising global public health emergency. Then, it is a priority to undertake innovations in preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic methods. Improved diagnostic methods for tuberculosis are urgently needed to address this global epidemic. These methods should be rapid, accurate, affordable, and able to detect drug-resistant tuberculosis. The benefits of these new diagnostic technics include earlier diagnosis and treatment, improved patient outcomes, and reduced economic burden. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the diagnostic performance of droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-a third-generation PCR-compared with quantitative Real Time-PCR (qPCR) for diagnosing pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis. We included 14 diagnostic accuracy test studies performed in Asia, Europe, and Latin America, 1,672 participants or biological samples, and 975 events (pulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis). Most of the included studies had a low risk of bias (QUADAS-C tool). Sensitivity and specificity were lower for ddPCR [0.56 (95% CI 0.53-0.58) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.98), respectively] than for qPCR [0.66 (95% CI 0.60-0.71) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), respectively]. However, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was higher for ddPCR than for qPCR (0.97 and 0.94, respectively). Comparing both AUCs using the Hanley & McNeil method, we found statistically significant differences (AUC difference of 4.40%, p = 0.0020). In the heterogeneity analysis, we found significant differences between both techniques according to the continent of origin of the study and the location of tuberculosis (pulmonary or extrapulmonary disease). The AUCs of both methods were similar in pulmonary tuberculosis. However, for extrapulmonary tuberculosis, the AUC was higher for ddPCR. We found some limitations: (1) significant heterogeneity of the studies, and (2) we could not perform subgroup analyses according to other relevant variables, such as the age and sex of the participants. Nonetheless, this study is the first meta-analysis that shows that ddPCR has a comparable diagnostic performance than qPCR for pulmonary tuberculosis. However, for extrapulmonary tuberculosis, ddPCR has a better discriminant capacity to differentiate between patients with and without extrapulmonary tuberculosis. We conclude that ddPCR is likely the best diagnostic technic for tuberculosis diagnosis, especially for extrapulmonary tuberculosis. More studies are still needed yet. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022382768, CRD42022382768.

9.
J Clin Med ; 12(7)2023 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37048661

ABSTRACT

One-third of adult inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) develop acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, heart failure (HF), arrhythmias, or die. The evidence linking CAP to cardiovascular disease (CVD) events is contradictory. We aimed to systematically review the role of CAP as a CVD risk factor. We registered the protocol (CRD42022352910) and searched for six databases from inception to 31 December 2022. We included 13 observational studies, 276,109 participants, 18,298 first ACS events, 12,421 first stroke events, 119 arrhythmic events, 75 episodes of new onset or worsening HF, 3379 deaths, and 218 incident CVD events. CAP increased the odds of ACS (OR 3.02; 95% CI 1.88-4.86), stroke (OR 2.88; 95% CI 2.09-3.96), mortality (OR 3.22; 95% CI 2.42-4.27), and all CVD events (OR 3.37; 95% CI 2.51-4.53). Heterogeneity was significant (I2 = 97%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis found differences according to the continent of origin of the study, the follow-up length, and the sample size (I2 > 40.0%, p < 0.10). CAP is a significant risk factor for all major CVD events including ACS, stroke, and mortality. However, these findings should be taken with caution due to the substantial heterogeneity and the possible publication bias.

10.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1307715, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38179307

ABSTRACT

Introduction: SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2Is) have demonstrated cardioprotective and nephroprotective effects in patients with and without diabetes. Recent studies suggest that SGLT2Is may reduce the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary arteriography (CAG) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, the evidence is still inconclusive. We aimed to systematically review the evidence regarding the potential nephroprotective role of SGLT2Is in preventing CIN in this population. Methods: We searched for studies in six databases published up to September 30, 2023, following a PECO/PICO strategy. Initially, we meta-analyzed five studies, but due to several reasons, mainly methodological concerns, we excluded one RCT. In our final meta-analysis, we included four observational studies. Results: This meta-analysis comprised 2,572 patients with diabetes undergoing CAG or PCI, 512 patients treated with SGLT2Is, and 289 events of CIN. This is the first meta-analysis demonstrating that SGLT2Is may reduce the risk of developing CIN by up to 63% (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.24-0.58) in patients with diabetes undergoing CAG or PCI, compared to not using SGLT2Is. Statistical heterogeneity was not significant (I2 = 0%, p = 0.91). We assessed the certainty of the evidence of this systematic review and meta-analysis, according to the GRADE criteria, as moderate. Conclusion: SGLT2Is significantly reduce the risk of CIN by up to 63% in patients with diabetes undergoing CAG or PCI. Clinical trials are needed; several are already underway, which could confirm our findings and investigate other unresolved issues, such as the optimal dose, type, and duration of SGLT2 inhibitor therapy to prevent CIN. Systematic Review: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023412892.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Diabetes Mellitus , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Humans , Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Coronary Angiography/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Observational Studies as Topic , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use
11.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1515161

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La trombólisis intravenosa con Alteplase (ALT) se recomienda como tratamiento estándar siendo el único agente trombolítico aprobado por la FDA, en infarto cerebral. La Tenecteplase (TNK), un activador tisular del plasminógeno modificado, surge como agente antitrombótico alternativo. Esta revisión narrativa evalúa la evidencia actual y aborda los problemas prácticos sobre la eficacia y seguridad de tenecteplase en comparación con alteplase. Metodología: Se realizó una búsqueda sistemática y analítica de la literatura, y se proporcionó una síntesis cualitativa de metaanálisis y ensayos clínicos concluidos, que compararon la efectividad y seguridad de la tenecteplase con alteplase en el AIS, utilizando artículos indexados en MEDLINE, Cochrane Library y Scopus. Resultados: Los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados en su mayoría coinciden al encontrar que TNK es al menos tan o más efectiva que la ALT para mejoría neurológica después del AIS; mientras los metaanálisis coinciden en que los pacientes que recibieron TNK presentaron una mayor recanalización exitosa, pero difieren en cuanto a los hallazgos de mejoría neurológica temprana, resultado funcional a los 90 días y mortalidad a los 90 días. Conclusión: La tenecteplase es al menos tan eficaz como la Alteplase con respecto a la mejoría neurológica después del tratamiento del accidente cerebrovascular isquémico agudo.


Introduction: Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase (ALT) is recommended as standard treatment, being the only thrombolytic agent approved by the FDA. Tenecteplase (TNK), a modified tissue plasminogen activator, is emerging as an alternative antithrombotic agent. This narrative review assesses the current evidence and addresses practical issues regarding the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase compared to alteplase. Methodology: A systematic and analytical search of the literature was performed, providing a qualitative synthesis of meta-analyses and completed clinical trials comparing the effectiveness and safety of tenecteplase with alteplase in AIS, using articles indexed in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Results: Randomized clinical trials mostly agree in finding TNK to be at least as or more effective than ALT for neurological improvement after AIS; while the meta-analyses agree that patients who received TNK had more successful recanalization, they differ in terms of the findings of early neurological improvement, functional outcome at 90 days, and mortality at 90 days. Conclusion: Tenecteplase is at least as effective as alteplase with regard to neurological improvement after treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

12.
Infez Med ; 30(4): 501-515, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36482952

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Previous observational studies have suggested an association between periodontal disease (PD) and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Nonetheless, evidence linking PD with coronary heart disease (CHD) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is still contradictory. We aim to systematically review the role of PD as a risk factor for ACS (myocardial infarction and unstable angina). Methods: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021286278) and we followed the recommendations of the PRISMA and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. We systematically searched for 7 databases and electronic thesis repositories from inception to February 2022. We included articles without language restriction following the PECO strategy (population: "adult participants"; exposure: "periodontal disease"; comparator: "no periodontal disease"; outcome: "acute coronary syndrome" OR "acute myocardial infarction" OR "unstable angina"). Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were pooled using random effects and heterogeneity was quantified by Cochran's Q and Higgins' I2 statistics. Subgroup analyses were carried out according to the participants' sex, type of diagnosis of PD, type of study, and continent of origin of studies. Results: We included 46 papers (17 cohort, 25 case-control, and 4 cross-sectional studies) that met the inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis includes a total of 6,806,286 participants and at least 68,932 ACS events, mainly myocardial infarction (MI). In accordance with our results, PD is associated with a higher risk of ACS (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.25-1.45). However, clinical and methodological heterogeneity was significant (I2=86%, p<0.05). In the sensitivity analysis, the exclusion of some studies with "extreme" results (outliers) did not significantly affect the overall estimate or heterogeneity. In subgroup analysis, we found no statistically significant differences between men and women according to subgroup difference tests (I2=0%, p=0.67). Conversely, there were differences according to the type of diagnosis of PD (clinical or self-reported diagnosis), type of study (cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional study), and the continent of origin (North America, South America, Asia, or Europe) of the studies (I2=79%-96%, p<0.10). Of the 46 studies, only 4 had a high risk of bias. Additionally, the funnel plot suggested publication bias. Conclusion: PD may be an important non-traditional risk factor for ACS. Although, this meta-analysis brings together more studies, and therefore more evidence, than any other previous similar study, its results should be interpreted with caution due to the great heterogeneity and the potential presence of bias.

13.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 7(11)2022 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36355885

ABSTRACT

Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus are two global pandemics and rising public health problems. Recent studies suggest that oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) could reduce the risk of tuberculosis and improve clinical outcomes. However, the evidence is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to assess the effect of OADs on the risk of tuberculosis and treatment outcomes. We systematically searched for six databases from inception to 31 August 2022. We followed a predefined PICO/PECO strategy and included two randomized controlled trials and sixteen observational studies. This study collects 1,109,660 participants, 908,211 diabetic patients, and at least 13,841 tuberculosis cases. Our results show that metformin decreases the risk of active tuberculosis by 40% (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47-0.77) in diabetic patients. In addition, metformin exhibits a dose-response gradient (medium doses reduce the risk of active tuberculosis by 45%, while high doses reduce this risk by 52%). On the other hand, DPP IV inhibitors increase the risk of active tuberculosis by 43% (RR 1.43; 95% CI 1.02-2.02). Subgroup analysis showed that study design and metformin dose accounted for the heterogeneity. We conclude that metformin significantly protects against active tuberculosis among diabetic patients. On the contrary, DPP IV inhibitors could increase the risk of developing active tuberculosis.

14.
Infez Med ; 30(2): 194-203, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35693063

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Tuberculosis is a major cause of global morbidity and mortality. Statins could be associated with a lower risk of some infectious diseases, including tuberculosis. Statins could reduce the risk of latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis, acting as an adjuvant in treating tuberculosis. This study aimed to determine if statins reduce the risk of active tuberculosis. Methods: We systematically analyzed 8 databases from inception to December 2021. We included articles without language restriction if they met our inclusion and exclusion criteria and the PECO strategy (Population: adults without active pulmonary tuberculosis; Exposure: treatment with any statin; Comparator: no use of statins; Outcome: active tuberculosis). Odds Ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random- effects models regardless of heterogeneity quantified by Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. We performed subgroup analyses according to the participants' diabetic status and follow-up length (≤10 years or >10 years). Results: Twelve articles reporting observational studies involving 3.038.043 participants, including at least 32.668 cases of active tuberculosis. Eight reported retrospective cohort studies, three nested case-control study, and one was a case control study.According to our meta-analysis, statins may reduce the risk of active tuberculosis, in the general population (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81), in non-diabetic (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.80) and in diabetic patients (OR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.87). This protective effect did not differ according to the participants' diabetic status nor follow-up length (test for subgroup differences I2=0). We found significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Similarly, the forest plot, and the I2 and Chi2 statistics suggested considerable statistical heterogeneity (I2=95%, p<0.05, respectively). Of the 12 included studies, 9 were at low risk of bias and 3 were at high risk of bias. Similarly, according to the funnel plot, it is very likely that there are important publication biases. Conclusion: Statin use may significantly reduce the risk of tuberculosis in the general population, diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised when interpreting these conclusions, due to the quality of the evidence, the heterogeneity of the studies, the presence of bias, and the difficulty in extrapolating these results to populations of other races and ethnicities.

15.
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1398237

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El objetivo de este estudio fue sintetizar la evidencia sobre las causas de muerte súbita cardiaca (MSC) asociada a hipokalemia en individuos de ≥15 a <65 años de edad sin cardiopatía estructural. Reporte de caso. Reportamos un caso y recopilamos casos de MSC siguiendo la estrategia PECO. Realizamos una búsqueda bibliográfica hasta el 30 de noviembre del 2021. Incluimos 25 casos. La edad media fue 33,8 ± 2,4 años. Del total de casos, 60% fueron varones y 60% correspondieron a etiologías adquiridas. La tirotoxicosis fue la etiología del 8% de casos. El intervalo QTc estuvo prolongado en 90% de casos en los que se pudo registrar. El 60% de casos fueron extrahospitalarios. Solo el 24% de los episodios resultaron en muerte. Conclusiones. La tirotoxicosis es una causa rara de parada cardiaca súbita (PCS) hipokalémica. La PCS parece asociarse a mejores clínicos comparada con la PCS asociada a kiperkalemia o normokalemia.


Introduction: The aim of this study was to synthesize the evidence on the causes of sudden cardiac death (SCD) associated with hypokalemia in individuals ≥15 to <65 years of age without structural heart disease. Case report. We reported a case and collected SCD cases following the PECO strategy. We conducted a bibliographic search of the literature published up to November 30, 2021. We included 25 cases. The mean age was 33.8 ± 2.4 years. Of the total cases, 60% were male and 60% corresponded to acquired etiologies. Thyrotoxicosis was the etiology of 8% of cases. The QTc interval was prolonged in 90% of the cases in which it could be recorded. Sixty percent of cases occurred out of hospital. Only 24% of episodes resulted in death. Conclusions. Thyrotoxicosis is a rare cause of hypokalemic sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Hypokalemic SCA seems to be associated with better clinical results compared to SCA associated with hyperkalemia or normokalemia.

16.
Infez Med ; 31(1): 93-102, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36908390

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Tetanus is a potentially lethal infection and remains a priority public health problem in countries with low vaccination coverage. We aim to synthesize the evidence on the clinical-epidemiologic characteristics of oral (odontogenic) tetanus. Methods: We report a case of oral tetanus. Furthermore, we collected eligible articles about oral tetanus published to date. We performed a systematic review with an exhaustive search of the literature published up to June 30, 2022, in Medline (PubMed), Google Scholar, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Results: We analyzed 19 studies that enrolled 26 cases of oral tetanus. The mean age was 51.60 ± 21.95 (range 10-77) years. The frequency and lethality of odontogenic tetanus were higher in males than females. More than 60% of cases occurred in North America. Almost three-quarters of cases were associated with a dental procedure - mainly dental extraction - meanwhile, tooth decay accounted for 23% of cases. The median incubation period was 8.0 (IQR 10.0) days. The time between trismus and death was 4.25±1.89 (range 3-7) days. Clostridium tetani was isolated in only 11.54% of cases. Administration of anti-tetanus immunoglobulin alone or combined with anti-tetanus toxoid was reported in at least 42% of cases, and antibiotics in 32% of cases. Patients required tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation in 12% and 8% of cases, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 18.38±14.97 (range 4-53) days. The lethality of odontogenic tetanus was (30.77%). Conclusion: Since the diagnosis of tetanus is merely clinical, it is crucial to have a high index of suspicion to diagnose this disease correctly. Although odontogenic tetanus is rare, it is potentially life-threatening.

17.
Bol. malariol. salud ambient ; 62(2): 227-232, 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIVECS | ID: biblio-1379517

ABSTRACT

La enfermedad COVID-19 tiene como complicación el de Síndrome Agudo Respiratorio Severo (SDRA), que es considerada la principal causa de mortalidad dentro de las unidades de cuidados intensivos, a pesar de brindar soporte ventilatorio precoz y óptimo. Sin embargo, es necesario identificar los factores que se asocian a mortalidad en estos pacientes. Objetivo: Determinar cuáles son los factores asociados a mortalidad en pacientes críticos con Síndrome de distrés respiratorio agudo severo por COVID-19 en unidad de cuidados intensivos. Material y métodos: Estudio transversal analítico. Se usó una base de datos obtenida de 176 historias clínicas de los pacientes con distrés respiratorio agudo severo por COVID-19 en un hospital público de Trujillo desde marzo 2020 a junio 2021. Se dividieron un grupo de pacientes que sobreviven y otro grupo de los que fallecen, subdividiéndose según presentaron o no factores de mortalidad asociados. Se realizó un análisis bivariado y con los factores que resultaron estadísticamente significativos se realizó un análisis multivariado para determinar variables asociadas a mortalidad. Resultados: Se halló una mortalidad de 57% del total de pacientes, al realizar el análisis multivariado se encontró asociación estadística significativa en la presencia de comorbilidades medidas con el Índice de Charlson (RPa=1,348; IC 95%: 1,01-1,79; p=0,040) y dentro de los parámetros ventilatorios a la presión pico (RPa=1,261 IC; 95%: 1,13-1,40; p<=0,000). Es necesario identificar aquellas variables de riesgo de mortalidad para estratificar a pacientes y optimizar la terapéutica(AU)


The COVID-19 disease is complicated by severe acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS), which is considered the main cause of mortality within intensive care units, despite providing early and optimal ventilatory support. However, it is necessary to identify the factors associated with mortality in these patients. Objective: To determine the factors associated with mortality in critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 in the intensive care unit. Material and methods: Analytical cross-sectional study. A database obtained from 176 medical records of patients with severe acute respiratory distress due to COVID-19 was used in a public hospital in Trujillo from March 2020 to June 2021. A group of patients who survived and another group of those who died were divided, being subdivided according to whether or not they present associated mortality factors. A bivariate analysis was performed and with the factors that were statistically significant, a multivariate analysis was performed to determine variables associated with mortality. Results: A mortality of 57% of the total number of patients was found, when performing the multivariate analysis, a significant statistical association was found in the presence of comorbidities measured with the Charlson Index (RPa = 1.348; 95% CI: 1.01-1.79; p = 0.040) and within the ventilatory parameters at peak pressure (RPa = 1.261 CI; 95%: 1.13-1.40; p <= 0.000). It is necessary to identify those mortality risk variables to stratify patients and optimize therapy(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/mortality , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19/complications , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors , Critical Care
18.
Bol. malariol. salud ambient ; 62(2): 241-250, 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIVECS | ID: biblio-1379579

ABSTRACT

Establecer la validez diagnóstica de la escala CALL como predictor de mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19 severo en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Regional Docente de Trujillo desde abril del 2020 hasta julio del 2021. Material y métodos: Se llevó a cabo un estudio analítico, retrospectivo, en el cual se incluyeron a 177 pacientes con COVID-19 severo internados en Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Regional Docente de Trujillo, según criterios de selección, se calculó la escala CALL para cada uno y se asoció con la mortalidad encontrada; aplicándose la prueba estadística chi cuadrado; posteriormente se realizó un análisis de regresión multivariante para identificar los factores de riesgo asociados a la mortalidad. A su vez se utilizó el AUROC (área bajo la curva ROC) para establecer el rendimiento predictivo de la escala CALL. Resultados: De una muestra de 177 pacientes, al analizar la información mediante la curva ROC, se obtuvo un valor de corte 6 puntos para la escala CALL, con un área bajo la curva (AUC) de 0.612 (p=0,014); sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y negativo de 86%, 29%, 60% y 62% respectivamente. No se encontraron diferencias significativas estadísticamente en cuanto a sexo, edad, shock séptico, SOFA, índice de comorbilidad de Charlson, necesidad de TRR ni compliance estática. En cambio, se evidenció asociación con la PaO2/FiO2(AU)


To establish the diagnostic validity of the CALL score as a predictor of mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit of the Trujillo Regional Teaching Hospital from April 2020 to July 2021.Material and methods: An analytical, retrospective study was carried out, in which 177 patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Regional Teaching Hospital of Trujillo were included, according to selection criteria, the CALL score was calculated for each one and was associated with the mortality found; applying the statistical chi 2 test; Subsequently, a multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with mortality. In turn, the AUROC (area under the ROC curve) was used to establish the predictive performance of the CALL score. Results: From a sample of 177 patients, when analyzing the information using the ROC curve, a cut-off value of 6 points was obtained for the CALL score, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.612 (p=0.014); sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 86%, 29%, 60% and 62% respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of sex, age, septic shock, SOFA, Charlson comorbidity index, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) or static compliance. On the other hand, an association with PaO2 / FiO2 was evidenced(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Critical Care , COVID-19/mortality , Intensive Care Units , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
19.
Bol. malariol. salud ambient ; 62(2): 251-259, 2022. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIVECS | ID: biblio-1380171

ABSTRACT

La ventilación mecánica invasiva como estrategia terapéutica no está exenta de complicaciones. Es imperativo tener parámetros de ventilación protectiva en aquellos pacientes que están sometidos a ello. Se pretende demostrar si la potencia mecánica como parámetro ventilatorio tiene validez pronóstica de mortalidad en pacientes críticos con ventilación mecánica invasiva prolongada. Material y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal analítico de pacientes críticos en ventilación mecánica invasiva prolongada debido a Síndrome de Distrés Respiratorio Agudo por COVID-19 que ingresaron a la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Regional Docente de Trujillo durante el periodo de marzo 2020 a marzo del 2021. Resultados: La potencia mecánica, como parámetro ventilatorio, se asocia a mortalidad (RPa 1.061; IC 95% 1.037-1.085; p=0.00) al igual que la presión plateau y siendo la driving pressure y compliance estática factores protectores para mortalidad. La potencia mecánica como parámetro ventilatorio tiene validez pronóstica para mortalidad severa por COVID-19(AU)


Invasive mechanical ventilation as a therapeutic strategy is not without complications. It is imperative to have protective ventilation parameters in those patients who are subjected to it. We aim to demonstrate whether mechanical power as a ventilatory parameter has prognostic validity for mortality in critically ill patients with prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation. Material and Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was carried out of critically ill patients on prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation due to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome due to COVID-19 who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of the Hospital Regional de Trujillo during the March 2020 to March 2021 period. Results: Mechanical power, as a ventilatory parameter, is associated with mortality (RPa 1.061; 95% CI 1.037-1.085; p = 0.00) as well as plateau pressure, and driving pressure and static compliance are protective factors for mortality. Mechanical power as a ventilatory parameter has prognostic validity for mortality in critically ill patients with invasive mechanical ventilation due to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/mortality , COVID-19 , Respiratory Therapy , Intensive Care Units
20.
Bol. malariol. salud ambient ; 62(3): 412-419, 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIVECS | ID: biblio-1395991

ABSTRACT

La COVID-19 es una enfermedad infecciosa que causa importantes disfunciones respiratorias con repercusión a largo plazo, perdurando después del alta médico. En este estudio, se determinó la asociación entre los factores sociodemográficos, clínicos y asistenciales con el impacto de la COVID-19 en la capacidad funcional respiratoria post alta hospitalaria. Material y métodos: estudio observacional, analítico, transversal. La muestra conformada por 385 pacientes con diagnóstico de COVID-19. Se aplicó una ficha de recolección de datos, se estimó la capacidad funcional respiratoria. Se realizó un análisis bivariado mediante la prueba de chi cuadrado y razón de prevalencias considerando una significancia del 95% (p<0,05). Resultados: De los 385 pacientes, 228 (59,2%) se les percibió capacidad respiratoria normal y, disminuida en 157 (40,8%). Los adultos contemporáneos (55,84%) y masculinos (67,80%) fueron mayormente afectados. La comorbilidad (p= 0,292) y Co-Rads (p= 0,797) no mostraron estar directamente asociadas a la afectación respiratoria; contrario a RALE ≥ 3 en Radiografía de tórax (p=0,000). El tiempo en hospitalización, UCI y ventilación mecánica sugiere estar relacionado con la disminución respiratoria. Sin embargo, por RPc no hubo evidencia estadísticamente significativa. Pero, clínica severa 3.029 [1.611 ­ 5.696] p= 0.001 y RALE ≥3 4.079 [2.248 ­ 7.401] p= 0,000, arrojaron asociación. Conclusión: se identificaron como factores asociados el grado de severidad y RALE≥ 3 en radiografía de tórax. Se sugiere realizar estudios que confirme los hallazgos de esta investigación y se proponga un protocolo de rehabilitación integral dirigido a pacientes post covid-19 que les permita recuperar la normalidad en la capacidad funcional respiratoria(AU)


COVID-19 is an infectious disease that causes significant respiratory dysfunctions with long-term repercussions, lasting after medical discharge. In this study, association between socio-demographic, clinical and healthcare factors with the impact of COVID-19 on post-discharge respiratory functional capacity was determinated. Material and methods: observational study, analytical, cross-sectional study. The sample made up of 385 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. A data collection form was applied; the respiratory functional capacity was estimated. A bivariate analysis was performed using the fe chi square test and prevalence ratio, considering a significance of 95% (p<0.05). Results: of the 385 patients, 228 (59.2%) had normal respiratory capacity, and decreased in 157 (40.8%). Contemporary adults (55.84%) and males (67.80%) were mostly affected. Comorbidity (p= 0,292) and Co-Rads (p= 0,797) were not shown to be directly associated with respiratory involvement; contrary to RALE ≥ 3 in chest X-ray (p=0,000). The time in hospitalization, ICU and mechanical ventilation suggests to be related to the respiratory decrease. However, by PCR there was no statically significant evidence. But, clinical severe 3,029 [1,611 ­ 5,696] p= 0.001 and RALE ≥3 4,079 [2,248 ­ 7,401] p= 0,000, showed association. Conclusion: the degree of severity and RALE ≥ 3 in chest X-ray were identified as associated factors. It is suggest to carry out studies that confirm the findings of this research and propose a comprehensive rehabilitation protocol aimed at post-covid-19 patients that allows them to recover normal respiratory functional capacity(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Patient Discharge , Respiratory Sounds , Maximal Voluntary Ventilation , COVID-19/complications , Sociodemographic Factors , Comorbidity , Communicable Diseases , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitalization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...