ABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Neuromuscular Blockade/methods , Neuromuscular Blocking Agents/administration & dosage , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Consensus , Patient SafetyABSTRACT
Introducción. El bloqueo neuromuscular facilita la manipulación de la vía aérea, la ventilación y procedimientos quirúrgicos, pero no hay un consenso a nivel nacional que facilite la práctica clínica habitual. El objetivo fue conocer el grado de acuerdo entre anestesiólogos y cirujanos sobre el uso clínico del bloqueo neuromuscular, para establecer recomendaciones de mejora de su empleo durante un procedimiento anestésico-quirúrgico. Métodos. Estudio de consenso multidisciplinar en España, que incluyó anestesiólogos expertos en bloqueo neuromuscular (n=65) y cirujanos generales (n=36). Se utilizó metodología Delphi. Cuestionario con 17 preguntas consensuado por un comité científico, al que respondieron los expertos en dos olas. El cuestionario incluyó preguntas sobre: tipo de cirugía, tipo de paciente, beneficios/perjuicios durante y después de la cirugía, repercusión de la monitorización objetiva y del uso de fármacos reversores, la viabilidad de abordaje multidisciplinar y eficiente del procedimiento quirúrgico, enfocado en el grado de bloqueo neuromuscular. Resultados. Se establecieron cinco recomendaciones: 1) el bloqueo neuromuscular profundo es muy adecuado en cirugía abdominal (grado de acuerdo 94,1%), y 2) en pacientes con obesidad (76,2%); 3) el mantenimiento del bloqueo neuromuscular profundo hasta el final de la cirugía puede ser beneficioso en aspectos clínicos, como inmovilidad del paciente o mejor acceso quirúrgico (86,1 y 72,3%); 4) la monitorización cuantitativa y la disponibilidad de reversores del bloqueo neuromuscular es recomendable (89,1%); 5) se recomiendan protocolos de actuación conjuntos entre anestesiólogos y cirujanos. Conclusiones. La colaboración entre anestesiólogos y cirujanos generales, ha permitido establecer una serie de recomendaciones genéricas sobre el uso de bloqueo neuromuscular profundo en cirugía abdominal (AU)
Introduction. Neuromuscular blockade enables airway management, ventilation and surgical procedures. However there is no national consensus on its routine clinical use. The objective was to establish the degree of agreement among anaesthesiologists and general surgeons on the clinical use of neuromuscular blockade in order to make recommendations to improve its use during surgical procedures. Methods. Multidisciplinary consensus study in Spain. Anaesthesiologists experts in neuromuscular blockade management (n=65) and general surgeons (n=36) were included. Delphi methodology was selected. A survey with 17 final questions developed by a dedicated scientific committee was designed. The experts answered the successive questions in two waves. The survey included questions on: type of surgery, type of patient, benefits/harm during and after surgery, impact of objective neuromuscular monitoring and use of reversal drugs, viability of a multidisciplinary and efficient approach to the whole surgical procedure, focussing on the level of neuromuscular blockade. Results. Five recommendations were agreed: 1) deep neuromuscular blockade is very appropriate for abdominal surgery (degree of agreement 94.1%), 2) and in obese patients (76.2%); 3) deep neuromuscular blockade maintenance until end of surgery might be beneficial in terms of clinical aspects, such as as immobility or better surgical access (86.1 to 72.3%); 4) quantitative monitoring and reversal drugs availability is recommended (89.1%); finally 5) anaesthesiologists/surgeons joint protocols are recommended. Conclusions. Collaboration among anaesthesiologists and surgeons has enabled some general recommendations to be established on deep neuromuscular blockade use during abdominal surgery (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Consensus , Neuromuscular Blockade/instrumentation , Neuromuscular Blockade/methods , Neuromuscular Blockade , Anesthesia, General/methods , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Muscle Relaxation , Evaluation of the Efficacy-Effectiveness of Interventions , Muscle Relaxants, Central/therapeutic use , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Drug Monitoring/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Neuromuscular blockade enables airway management, ventilation and surgical procedures. However there is no national consensus on its routine clinical use. The objective was to establish the degree of agreement among anaesthesiologists and general surgeons on the clinical use of neuromuscular blockade in order to make recommendations to improve its use during surgical procedures. METHODS: Multidisciplinary consensus study in Spain. Anaesthesiologists experts in neuromuscular blockade management (n=65) and general surgeons (n=36) were included. Delphi methodology was selected. A survey with 17 final questions developed by a dedicated scientific committee was designed. The experts answered the successive questions in two waves. The survey included questions on: type of surgery, type of patient, benefits/harm during and after surgery, impact of objective neuromuscular monitoring and use of reversal drugs, viability of a multidisciplinary and efficient approach to the whole surgical procedure, focussing on the level of neuromuscular blockade. RESULTS: Five recommendations were agreed: 1) deep neuromuscular blockade is very appropriate for abdominal surgery (degree of agreement 94.1%), 2) and in obese patients (76.2%); 3) deep neuromuscular blockade maintenance until end of surgery might be beneficial in terms of clinical aspects, such as as immobility or better surgical access (86.1 to 72.3%); 4) quantitative monitoring and reversal drugs availability is recommended (89.1%); finally 5) anaesthesiologists/surgeons joint protocols are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration among anaesthesiologists and surgeons has enabled some general recommendations to be established on deep neuromuscular blockade use during abdominal surgery.
Subject(s)
Neuromuscular Blockade/methods , Adult , Anesthesiology , Contraindications, Procedure , Delayed Emergence from Anesthesia/prevention & control , Delphi Technique , Expert Testimony , Female , General Surgery , Humans , Intraoperative Awareness/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Neuromuscular Blockade/adverse effects , Neuromuscular Blockade/standards , Neuromuscular Blocking Agents/administration & dosage , Neuromuscular Blocking Agents/adverse effects , Neuromuscular Monitoring , Physicians/psychologyABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Neurosurgery/methods , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Venous Thrombosis/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/surgery , Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Thromboembolism/surgery , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/trends , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapyABSTRACT
Objetivos. Conocer la práctica clínica de los anestesiólogos españoles en la tromboprofilaxis y el manejo de los anticoagulantes y antiagregantes en pacientes neuroquirúrgicos y neurocríticos. Material y métodos. Encuesta diseñada desde la Sección de Neurociencia de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación, con 22 preguntas, difundida y contestada en formato electrónico, disponible entre junio y octubre de 2012. Resultados. De los 73 centros hospitalarios con servicio de Neurocirugía incluidos en el Catálogo Nacional de Hospitales, se recibió respuesta válida a la encuesta on line por parte de 41 anestesiólogos de 37 centros (tasa de respuesta del 50,7%). Se consideró una respuesta de cada centro. Solo el 27% de los centros respondedores disponían de un protocolo escrito específico para el manejo de estos pacientes. La tromboprofilaxis mecánica se utilizó hasta en un 80%, aunque de forma variable, y la farmacológica en un 75% de los centros. La enoxaparina fue la heparina de bajo peso molecular más utilizada en pacientes sometidos a craneotomía (78%). En la mitad de los centros respondedores se realizaron craneotomías manteniendo el tratamiento con ácido acetilsalicílico en los pacientes con antecedentes de cardiopatía isquémica, stent coronario y antiagregación dual. Conclusiones. La tromboprofilaxis mecánica es más utilizada que la farmacológica en la población neuroquirúrgica de nuestro país. El manejo de los pacientes tratados previamente con anticoagulantes presenta una marcada variabilidad clínica entre los diferentes hospitales, mientras que el tratamiento con antiagregantes se modifica en función de si se trata de profilaxis primaria o secundaria (AU)
Objectives. To determine the protocols used by Spanish anaesthesiologists for thromboprophylaxis and anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs management in neurosurgical or neurocritical care patients. Material and methods. An online survey with 22 questions, with one or multiple options, launched by the Neuroscience Subcommittee of the Spanish Anaesthesia Society and available between June and October 2012. Results. Of the 73 hospitals included in the National Hospitals Catalogue, a valid response to the online questionnaire was received by 41 anaesthesiologists from 37 sites (response rate 50.7%). Only one response per site was used. A specific protocol was available in 27% of these centres. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis is used, intraoperatively or postoperatively, in 80%, and pharmacological treatment is used by 75% of respondents. Enoxaparin was the most frequent heparin used in craniotomy patients (78%). Craniotomies were performed maintaining acetylsalicylic acid treatment in patients with coronary stents and double anti-platelet treatment in a half of the centres. Conclusions. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis is used more frequently than the pharmacological approach in neurosurgical or neurocritical populations in Spanish hospitals. Management of patients under previous anticoagulant treatment was highly heterogeneous among hospitals included in this survey. Previous antiplatelet treatment is modified depending on primary or secondary prescription (AU)
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Thrombosis/complications , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Neurosurgery/methods , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Anesthesia , Risk Factors , Neurosurgical Procedures/trends , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Data Collection/instrumentation , Data Collection/methods , Data Collection , Societies, Medical/standardsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the protocols used by Spanish anaesthesiologists for thromboprophylaxis and anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs management in neurosurgical or neurocritical care patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey with 22 questions, with one or multiple options, launched by the Neuroscience Subcommittee of the Spanish Anaesthesia Society and available between June and October 2012. RESULTS: Of the 73 hospitals included in the National Hospitals Catalogue, a valid response to the online questionnaire was received by 41 anaesthesiologists from 37 sites (response rate 50.7%). Only one response per site was used. A specific protocol was available in 27% of these centres. Mechanical thromboprophylaxis is used, intraoperatively or postoperatively, in 80%, and pharmacological treatment is used by 75% of respondents. Enoxaparin was the most frequent heparin used in craniotomy patients (78%). Craniotomies were performed maintaining acetylsalicylic acid treatment in patients with coronary stents and double anti-platelet treatment in a half of the centres. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical thromboprophylaxis is used more frequently than the pharmacological approach in neurosurgical or neurocritical populations in Spanish hospitals. Management of patients under previous anticoagulant treatment was highly heterogeneous among hospitals included in this survey. Previous antiplatelet treatment is modified depending on primary or secondary prescription.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology/methods , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Perioperative Care/methods , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Critical Care/methods , Enoxaparin/therapeutic use , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices/statistics & numerical data , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Risk Factors , SpainABSTRACT
El manejo anestésico de los pacientes sometidos a procedimientos neuroquirúrgicos de fosa posterior presenta una serie de características particulares que deben ser conocidas por el anestesiólogo. Los cambios fisiopatológicos secundarios a la posición del paciente durante la cirugía, la relevancia del adecuado posicionamiento para facilitar el abordaje quirúrgico, la menor tolerancia a los cambios de elastancia de la región infratentorial, las escasas opciones terapéuticas ante un episodio de edema- hinchazón intraoperatorio y la presencia de complicaciones como la embolia aérea venosa condicionan la actuación intraoperatoria. Este primer apartado de las guías recoge las principales evidencias disponibles en la bibliografía respecto al abordaje preoperatorio e intraoperatorio de estos pacientes (AU)
The anesthesiological management of patients undergoing neurosurgery of the posterior fossa has a series of characteristics that should be known by anesthesiologists. Intraoperative management is guided by a series of factors that include the physiopathological changes secondary to the patients position during surgery, the importance of appropriate patient positioning to facilitate the surgical approach, the lower tolerance to changes in the elastance of the infratentorial region, the limited therapeutic options in episodes of intraoperative edema-swelling, and the presence of complications such as a venous air embolism. This first contribution to the guidelines discusses the main evidence available in the literature on the pre- and intraoperative approach to these patients (AU)
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Neuropharmacology/methods , Neuropharmacology/trends , Preoperative Care/methods , Intraoperative Period , Neurosurgery/methods , Anesthesia/methods , Anesthesia , Embolism, Air/drug therapy , Neurosurgical Procedures/trends , Cranial Fossa, PosteriorABSTRACT
La cirugía de fosa posterior y/o región craneorraquídea presenta una elevada tasa de morbimortalidad postoperatoria, escasamente descrita en la literatura científica. El propósito de esta revisión es describir las evidencias disponibles en la bibliografía respecto a las complicaciones asociadas y su manejo neuroanestesiológico y/o neurocrítico; así como resaltar los factores predisponentes que pueden influir en el incremento de la tasa de complicaciones.El conocimiento de las complicaciones relacionadas con la patología neuroquirúrgica de la fosa posterior, puede ayudar a su prevención o a la instauración de un tratamiento adecuado que permita minimizar sus consecuencias. Con este objetivo, en las diferentes bases de datos bibliográficos se realizó una búsqueda sistemática, en castellano e inglés, con los artículos comprendidos entre 1966 y 2012. Además se revisaron los manuscritos que se consideraron relevantes en las pesquisas bibliográficas identificadas. La emesis y el dolor postoperatorio son las complicaciones postoperatorias más frecuentemente descritas, seguida por el edema de la lengua y/o vía aérea, la afectación de pares craneales y la aparición de fístula de líquido cefalorraquídeo durante el postoperatorio. El resto de complicaciones fueron referidas como poco frecuentes. La cirugía de fosa posterior y craneorraquídea cervical posterior tiene mayor morbilidad y mortalidad que la cirugía del compartimento supratentorial. Además de las complicaciones de toda craneotomía, la cirugía infratentorial presenta complicaciones específicas. El trabajo en equipo entre todas las especialidades y estamentos implicados en la atención al paciente es fundamental para disminuir la morbimortalidad asociada a estos procedimientos (AU)
Surgery of the posterior fossa and/or craniospinal region has a high rate of postoperative morbidity and mortality, which has rarely been described in the scientific literature. This review aims to describe the available evidence in the literature on the complications associated with this type of surgery and its neuroanesthesiological and/or neurocritical management, as well as to highlight the predisposing factors that can increase the complications rate. Knowledge of the complications related to neurosurgical disorders of the posterior fossa could aid in their prevention or help in the selection of appropriate treatment that would minimize their consequences. A systematic literature search was made in Spanish and English for articles published between 1966 and 2012 in various databases. Articles considered important in the identified literature were reviewed. The most frequently described postoperative complications were vomiting and postoperative pain, followed by edema of the tongue and/or airway, involvement of the cranial nerves, and the development of cerebrospinal fluid fistulas. The remaining complications were reported as being uncommon. Posterior fossa and posterior cervical surgery produces higher morbidity and mortality than surgery of the supratentorial space. In addition to the complications involved in all craniotomies, infratentorial surgery has specific complications. Team work among all the specialties and staff involved in the care of these patients is essential to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with these procedures (AU)
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Neuropharmacology/methods , Neuropharmacology/trends , /methods , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/chemically induced , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/drug therapy , Cerebrospinal Fluid , Macroglossia/drug therapy , Mutism/drug therapy , Meningitis/drug therapy , Indicators of Morbidity and Mortality , Cranial Nerve Diseases/complicationsSubject(s)
Anesthesia , Scoliosis/surgery , Anesthesia/methods , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
No disponible
No disponible
