Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Regarding Antibiotic Prescription by Medical Interns: A Qualitative Study in Spain.

Antibiotic resistance is an issue of growing importance in the public health sphere. Medical interns are of great relevance when it comes to the source of this problem. This study therefore sought to ascertain which factors influence the management of antibiotic therapy by this population, in order to pinpoint the possible causes of misprescribing habits. We conducted a qualitative study based on focus group techniques, with groups consisting of medical interns from the Santiago de Compostela Clinical University Teaching Hospital. Our study identified factors which the participants considered to be determinants of antibiotic use and their relationship with the appearance of resistance. The single most repeated factor was the influence of the attending physician's judgement; other factors included a high healthcare burden or prescribing inertia. This stage is an opportunity to correct misprescribing habits, by implementing educational interventions aimed at modifying the identified factors.

Seguimiento de pacientes COVID-19 en aislamiento domiciliario mediante telemonitorización desde Atención Primaria / Follow-up for COVID-19 patients in home isolation through telemonitoring by Primary Care

El objetivo de este artículo es dar a conocer la experiencia de la implantación de la herramienta de teleseguimiento “TELEA” en el ámbito de Atención Primaria (AP) para la gestión de los casos COVID-19 en aislamiento domiciliario, así como describir su primer mes de implantación en el Área Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela y Barbanza (septiembre de 2020).La herramienta TELEA existía previamente para el seguimiento de personas con patología crónica y se adaptó al seguimiento en casos COVID-19. El servicio incluía una clasificación inicial de los pacientes tras la notificación automática e inmediata de pruebas diagnósticas positivas de COVID: asintomático, bajo riesgo, con factores de riesgo o con signos de alarma. En los tres primeros casos se ofrecía a los pacientes seguimiento y monitorización mediante una plataforma digital donde registraban datos biométricos y síntomas respiratorios tres veces al día. Esos datos estaban enlazados a la historia clínica y eran monitorizados por la enfermera de AP. Alternativamente se realizó seguimiento telefónico proactivo por parte de la enfermera. Si presentaban signos de alarma eran derivados al hospital de referencia.Se hizo seguimiento en 220 de las 229 personas candidatas (el 78,6%; n= 173 mediante TELEA). El tiempo medio de seguimiento fue de 13,8 días, mayor en los pacientes incluidos en TELEA que en el seguimiento telefónico (p< 0,01). Ingresaron durante el seguimiento el 6,8 % de los pacientes, ninguno falleció.El teleseguimiento con telemonitorización domiciliaria basada en el control proactivo y protocolizado por parte de la enfermera de AP permitió un seguimiento clínicamente útil de pacientes con COVID-19 en aislamiento domiciliario.(AU)

The objective of this article is to make public the experience of implementing the telemonitoring tool “TELEA” in the Primary Care (PC) setting for the management of COVID-19 cases in home isolation, as well as to describe its first month of implementation at the Santiago de Compostela and Barbanza Health Area (September 2020).The TELEA tool was previously used for the follow-up of persons with chronic conditions, and was then adapted for the follow-up of COVID-19 cases. The service included an initial classification of patients after the automatic and immediate report of positive COVID diagnostic tests: asymptomatic, low risk, with risk factors or with warning signs. In the three first cases, patients were offered follow-up and monitoring through a digital platform where biometric data and respiratory symptoms were registered three times per day. These data were linked with the clinical record and monitored by the PC nurse. Alternatively, there was proactive follow-up by telephone by the nurse. If patients presented warning signs, they were referred to the hospital of reference.Follow-up was conducted for 220 of the 229 adequate persons (78.6%; n= 173 through TELEA). The mean follow-up time was 13.8 days, higher for the patients included in TELEA than for those with follow-up by telephone (p< 0.01). During follow-up, 6.8% of patients were admitted to hospital; none of them died.Remote follow-up with home telemonitoring based on the proactive management under protocol by the PC nurse allowed a clinically useful follow-up of patients with COVID-19 in home isolation.(AU)

Impact of a multifaceted intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing: a pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the effectiveness and return on investment (ROI) of a multifaceted intervention aimed at improving antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care. DESIGN: Large-sized, two-arm, open-label, pragmatic, cluster-randomised controlled trial. SETTING: All primary care physicians working for the Spanish National Health Service (NHS) in Galicia (region in north-west Spain). PARTICIPANTS: The seven spatial clusters were distributed by unequal randomisation (3:4) of the intervention and control groups. A total of 1217 physicians (1.30 million patients) were recruited from intervention clusters and 1393 physicians (1.46 million patients) from control clusters. INTERVENTIONS: One-hour educational outreach visits tailored to training needs identified in a previous study; an online course integrated in practice accreditation; and a clinical decision support system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the ESAC (European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption) quality indicators for outpatient antibiotic use. We used generalised linear mixed and conducted a ROI analysis to ascertain the overall cost savings. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 19 months. The adjusted effect on overall antibiotic prescribing attributable to the intervention was - 4.2% (95% CI: - 5.3% to - 3.2%), with this being more pronounced for penicillins - 6.5 (95% CI: - 7.9% to - 5.2%) and for the ratio of consumption of broad- to narrow-spectrum penicillins, cephalosporins, and macrolides - 9.0% (95% CI: - 14.0 to - 4.1%). The cost of the intervention was €87 per physician. Direct savings per physician attributable to the reduction in antibiotic prescriptions was €311 for the NHS and €573 for patient contributions, with an ROI of €2.57 and €5.59 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions designed on the basis of gaps in physicians' knowledge of and attitudes to misprescription can improve antibiotic prescribing and yield important direct cost savings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24158380 . Registered 5 February 2009.

[Ethics Committee experience during COVID-19 emergency. A brief report.] / Experiencia de un Comité de Ética de la Investigación durante la pandemia por COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The health crisis caused by COVID-19 required the prompt launch of research in order to generate scientific evidence pertaining to the new disease oriented to control its devastating effects and continuous spread. Therefore, it was essential to adapt the work flow of Research Ethics Committees, to prioritize and to accelerate the evaluation of projects related to this disease. METHODS: This work analyses the evaluation conducted by our Regional Ethics Committees during the initial period of the health emergency (between 13th March and 28th May 2020). RESULTS: 81 research projects were evaluated, 73 of them of regional scope (62 single-centre), 4 national and 4 international. 57 projects obtained a favourable opinion, 4 were withdrawn by the sponsors, 6 did not require ethics approval and 14 did not respond to the clarifications requested up to the date of the study's closure. CONCLUSIONS: The most important research procedures to be analysed in this context are those related to the methodology and informed consent process. It is also essential to address aspects related to the privacy of personal data, and to take into account the workload of the researchers. As an improvement proposal, we think that greater collaboration between the different research teams should be encourage to obtain more robust results.

OBJETIVO: La crisis sanitaria motivada por la COVID-19 hace necesaria la puesta en marcha, con celeridad, de investigaciones encaminadas a generar evidencias científicas que incidan en el control de sus devastadores efectos. Por ello, fue necesario realizar ajustes en la dinámica de trabajo de los Comités de Ética de la Investigación, así como priorizar y agilizar la evaluación de los proyectos relacionados con dicha enfermedad. Este trabajo pretendió analizar la actividad la actividad evaluadora del Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos de Galicia (CEIm-G) durante dicho período de emergencia sanitaria. METODOS: Se evaluaron 81 proyectos de investigación, 73 de ellos de ámbito autonómico (62 unicéntricos), 4 nacionales y 4 internacionales. RESULTADOS: En 57 proyectos el dictamen fue favorable, 4 fueron retirados por los promotores, en 6 no procedía dictamen y 14 no respondieron a las aclaraciones solicitadas hasta la fecha del cierre del estudio. CONCLUSIONES: Las causas más frecuentes de solicitud de aclaraciones están relacionadas con la metodología y, a continuación, con la hoja de información al paciente y el consentimiento informado. También es imprescindible abordar los aspectos relacionados con la intimidad de los datos personales y las muestras, e igualmente tener en cuenta la carga de trabajo de los investigadores. Como propuesta de mejora, consideramos que se debe incidir en una mayor coordinación entre los diferentes equipos de investigación para tratar de obtener resultados más robustos.

Experiencia de un comité de ética de la investigación durante la pandemia por COVID-19 / Ethics Committee experience during COVID-19 emergency. A brief report

OBJETIVO: La crisis sanitaria motivada por la COVID-19 hace necesaria la puesta en marcha, con celeridad, de investigaciones encaminadas a generar evidencias científicas que incidan en el control de sus devastadores efectos. Por ello, fue necesario realizar ajustes en la dinámica de trabajo de los Comités de Ética de la Investigación, así como priorizar y agilizar la evaluación de los proyectos relacionados con dicha enfermedad. Este trabajo pretendió analizar la actividad la actividad evaluadora del Comité de Ética de la Investigación con Medicamentos de Galicia (CEIm-G) durante dicho período de emergencia sanitaria. MÉTODOS: Se evaluaron 81 proyectos de investigación, 73 de ellos de ámbito autonómico (62 unicéntricos), 4 nacionales y 4 internacionales. RESULTADOS: En 57 proyectos el dictamen fue favorable, 4 fueron retirados por los promotores, en 6 no procedía dictamen y 14 no respondieron a las aclaraciones solicitadas hasta la fecha del cierre del estudio. CONCLUSIONES: Las causas más frecuentes de solicitud de aclaraciones están relacionadas con la metodología y, a continuación, con la hoja de información al paciente y el consentimiento informado. También es imprescindible abordar los aspectos relacionados con la intimidad de los datos personales y las muestras, e igualmente tener en cuenta la carga de trabajo de los investigadores. Como propuesta de mejora, consideramos que se debe incidir en una mayor coordinación entre los diferentes equipos de investigación para tratar de obtener resultados más robustos

OBJECTIVE: The health crisis caused by COVID-19 required the prompt launch of research in order to generate scientific evidence pertaining to the new disease oriented to control its devastating effects and continuous spread. Therefore, it was essential to adapt the work flow of Research Ethics Committees, to prioritize and to accelerate the evaluation of projects related to this disease. METHODS: This work analyses the evaluation conducted by our Regional Ethics Committees during the initial period of the health emergency (between 13th March and 28th May 2020). RESULTS: 81 research projects were evaluated, 73 of them of regional scope (62 single-centre), 4 national and 4 international. 57 projects obtained a favourable opinion, 4 were withdrawn by the sponsors, 6 did not require ethics approval and 14 did not respond to the clarifications requested up to the date of the study's closure. CONCLUSIONS: The most important research procedures to be analysed in this context are those related to the methodology and informed consent process. It is also essential to address aspects related to the privacy of personal data, and to take into account the workload of the researchers. As an improvement proposal, we think that greater collaboration between the different research teams should be encourage to obtain more robust results

Magnitude and determinants of antibiotic dispensing without prescription in Spain: a simulated patient study.

Objectives: Excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics increases antimicrobial resistance. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude and determinants of antibiotic dispensing without prescription in Spain by the simulated patient technique. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with all the pharmacies in a region of north-west Spain (n = 977), between December 2016 and January 2017. Four actors visited the pharmacies simulating a respiratory infection. Four incremental levels of pressure were used to obtain an antibiotic. The education and sex of the person who was dispensing and the area where the pharmacy was located were recorded. The effect of these independent variables on the dispensing of an antibiotic without prescription (1 = yes, 0 = no) was modelled by logistic regression. Results: An antibiotic was obtained in 18.83% (95% CI = 16.5%-21.41%) of the visits. The area influenced the dispensing of antibiotics without a medical prescription, with a greater likelihood of dispensing in rural (OR = 1.79; 95% CI = 1.20-2.68) or semi-rural (OR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.13-2.44) areas than in urban areas. No association was found with the sex or the training of the person who dispensed the antibiotic. In the pharmacies in urban areas, a lower level of pressure was needed to obtain the antibiotic. Conclusions: This study shows that one-fifth of the pharmacies still dispense antibiotics without prescription, especially under patient pressure. A rural setting has been identified as a risk factor for dispensing without prescription, so it must be taken into account for future interventions.

Development and validation of the knowledge and attitudes regarding antibiotics and resistance (KAAR-11) questionnaire for primary care physicians.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a novel, self-administered questionnaire to identify primary-care physicians' knowledge and attitudes regarding antibiotics and resistance (KAAR). METHODS: The study population comprised primary care physicians. The study was conducted in five phases. Phase I consisted of a systematic review and qualitative focus-group study (n = 33 physicians), in which items were formulated so as to be measured on a continuous, visual analogue scale (VAS); in Phase II, content validation and face validity were evaluated by a panel of experts, which reformulated, added and deleted items; Phase III consisted of a pilot study on a population possessing similar characteristics (n = 15); in Phase IV, we analysed reliability by means of a test-retest study (n = 91) and calculated the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs); and in Phase V, we assessed construct validity by applying the known-groups technique, measuring the differences between contrasting groups of physicians formed according to antibiotic prescription quality indicators (group 1, n = 156 versus group 2, n = 191). RESULTS: Following Phases I and II, the questionnaire contained 16 knowledge and attitude items. Participants in the pilot study (Phase III) reported no difficulty. The test-retest study (Phase IV) showed that 11 of the 16 initial knowledge and attitude items yielded an ICC > 0.5, while analysis of known-groups validity (Phase V) showed that 13 of the 16 initial items which assessed knowledge and attitudes discriminated between physicians with good and bad indicators of antibiotics prescription. CONCLUSION: The final 11 item KAAR questionnaire appears to be valid, reliable and responsive.

Effect of Physicians' Attitudes and Knowledge on the Quality of Antibiotic Prescription: A Cohort Study.

Resistance increases with the use and abuse of antibiotics. Since physicians are primarily responsible for the decision to use antibiotics, ascertaining the attitudes and knowledge that underlie their prescribing habits is thus a prerequisite for improving prescription. Three-year follow-up cohort study (2008-2010) targeting primary-care physicians (n = 2100) in Galicia, a region in NW Spain. We used data obtained from a postal survey to assess knowledge and attitudes. A physician was deemed to have demonstrated Appropriate Quality Prescription of Antibiotics (dependent variable) in any case where half or more of the indicators proposed by the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption had values that were better than the reference values for Spain. The mail-questionnaire response rate was 68·0% (1428/2100). The adjusted increase in the interquartile OR of displaying good prescribing of antibiotics for each attitude was: 205% for fear ("When in doubt, it is better to ensure that a patient is cured of an infection by using a broad-spectrum antibiotic"; 95%CI: 125% to 321%); 119% for better knowledge ("Amoxicillin is useful for resolving most respiratory infections in primary care"; 95%CI: 67% to 193%); and 21% for complacency with patients' demands ("Antibiotics are often prescribed due to patients' demands"; 95%CI: 0% to 45%). Due to the fact that physicians' knowledge and attitudes are potentially modifiable, the implementation of purpose-designed educational interventions based on the attitudes identified may well serve to improve antibiotic prescription.